What’s in a Name? That Which We Call Capital Controls

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atish R Ghosh ◽  
Jun Il Kim ◽  
Mahvash S Qureshi

Abstract This paper investigates why controls on capital inflows have a bad name by tracing how capital controls have been used and perceived since the laissez-faire era of the classical gold standard. While advanced economies often employed capital controls to tame inflows during the last century, we conjecture that several factors undermined their subsequent use—most notably, a “guilt by association” with controls on capital outflows, which have typically been employed by autocratic regimes or those with failed macroeconomic policies. We formalize the idea of a possible guilt by association between inflow controls and outflow controls in a signaling model and provide some empirics consistent with it.

Author(s):  
Atish R. Ghosh ◽  
Jonathan D. Ostry ◽  
Mahvash S. Qureshi

This chapter summarizes how thinking about capital flows and their management has evolved in both policymaking and academic circles. Many advanced economies used restrictions on capital inflows for prudential purposes—even as they pursued financial liberalization more broadly—until the 1980s, when capital account restrictions began to be swept away as part of broader liberalization efforts. Likewise, many emerging markets that had inflow controls for prudential reasons dismantled them when liberalizing domestic financial markets and controls over outflows. That the use of capital controls as a means of managing inflows is often viewed with suspicion may be partly a “guilt by association” with outflow controls and exchange restrictions. Historically, these have been more prevalent and more intensive, and their purpose has been to prop up authoritarian regimes or poor macroeconomic policies, often affecting both current and capital transactions.


Policy Papers ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  

Emerging markets (EMs) are experiencing a surge in capital inflows, lifting asset prices and growth prospects. While inflows are typically beneficial for receiving countries, inflow surges can carry macroeconomic and financial stability risks. This paper reviews the recent experience of EMs in dealing with capital inflows and suggests a possible framework for IMF policy advice on the spectrum of measures available to policymakers to manage inflows, including macroeconomic policies, prudential measures and capital controls. Illustrative applications of this framework suggest that it may be appropriate for several countries, based on their current circumstances, to consider prudential measures or capital controls in response to capital inflows. The suggested framework is intended to inform staff policy advice to all Fund members with open capital accounts. It forms part of a broader effort to sharpen Fund surveillance, preserve evenhandedness, and foster greater global policy coordination. As indicated in the Supplement to this paper, this broader effort includes the development of “global rules of the game” on macroprudential policies, capital account liberalization, and reserve adequacy, and the preparation of spillover reports assessing spillovers from the five systemic economies—all of which will inform the current and broader framework being developed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 65-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Edwards

A number of authors have recently argued that, in order to avoid financial instability, emerging countries should rely on capital controls. Two type of controls have been considered: controls on capital outflows, and controls on capital inflows. In this paper I review the historical evidence on the effectiveness of these two type of controls. I argue that controls on outflows have been ineffective. They are circumvented and breed corruption. I also analyze Chile's recent experience with controls on inflows, and I argue that their effectiveness has been exaggerated.


Author(s):  
Yilmaz Akyüz

The crisis demolished the myth that EDEs were decoupled from advanced economies and BRICS were becoming new engines of global growth. From 2011 onwards, with the end of the twin booms in commodity prices and capital inflows, growth in EDEs has converged downward towards the depressed levels of advanced economies from the very high levels achieved in the run-up to the global crisis and the immediate aftermath. Loss of momentum is particularly visible in economies that failed to manage the earlier booms prudently. In examining the spillovers from policies in major advanced economies and China to EDEs, the chapter introduces the notion of commodity-finance nexus wherein these markets reinforce each other during both expansions and contractions. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of policies needed to put the world economy into decent shape and to avoid liquidity and debt crises in EDEs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Ifeakachukwu Nwosa ◽  
Temidayo Oladiran Akinbobola

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
S S Tarapore

With the liberalization of balance of payments, the monetary policy scenario in India underwent a sea change. While the merits and demerits of capital account liberalization have been debated, it is still not clear as to what extent the Indian economy has integrated with the global economy. There are basically two choices: either integrating with the international economy at a measured and orderly pace, or letting the world integrate with us in a disorderly manner on terms dictated by the international economy. The objective of macroeconomic management is to tailor the policies so as to maximize the gains of global integration while minimizing the adverse features of globalization. This article captures the dilemmas and challenges of formulating a favourable monetary policy and studies and projects the implications of the changing dimensions of monetary policy on the different parameters determining the banks� growth path. In the absence of RBI�s intervention, persistent capital inflows into the country could result in an unrestrained monetary expansion and a real effective exchange rate (REER) appreciation which in turn is likely to end up in a crisis. RBI has used a combination of the market stabilization scheme (MSS), the reverse repo, and the cash reserve ratio (CRR) to tackle the problem of excess liquidity. As CRR is considered a blunt instrument, RBI is suggested to use incremental cash reserve ratio to immobilize the excess liquidity from where it is lodged. In an extreme situation of excessive capital inflows, the author suggests the use of unremunerated reserve requirements on fresh inflows by foreign institutional investors. For the banks, large capital outflows could lead to a more difficult situation as pumping in of created money to restore liquidity could trigger further capital outflows. Remedial measures such as raising of interest rates, tightening of liquidity, and depreciation of exchange rate will have to be implemented in a non-disruptive manner so as to ensure that the economy does not go into a state of panic. For formulating a viable monetary policy, what is most important is to set objectives in such a way that there is a clear agreement between the government and the RBI. The present structure of the banking system is not conducive to the development of a strong and vibrant financial structure. There have been repeated recommendations to reduce government holding in public sector banks because of the government�s inability or reluctance to provide more capital to these banks. In the overall rapidly changing globalized scenario, the banks cannot remain isolated; they too need to keep pace and should therefore join the bandwagon.


Policy Papers ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (58) ◽  
Author(s):  

The recovery remains fragile and uneven. In many advanced economies, activity is still sluggish and unemployment high, while legacy problems in the financial system remain unresolved. Activity is more robust in many emerging and developing economies. However, their prospects also depend on a healthy, broad-based recovery among the advanced economies, owing to deep real and financial linkages. The key policy challenge is to effect a smooth transition from public- to private-sector-led growth in many advanced economies, and from external to domestically driven growth in key emerging economies. While short-term macroeconomic policies are broadly appropriate, completing the two rebalancing acts will require tackling the medium-term fiscal, financial, and structural challenges raised by the crisis. Without such reforms, growth could sputter, with grave economic and social consequences.


Subject Argentina's twin fiscal and trade deficits. Significance The recent plunge in global stock markets highlighted the exposure of the Argentine economy to a negative external shock, with the exchange rate depreciating by 2.5% in the first week of February. The worsening external deficit, combined with the still high fiscal deficit, increased concerns about the consistency of the economic policy framework and vulnerability to a sudden shift in capital inflows. Impacts Capital outflows will remain high absent greater public confidence in government policy. Slow fiscal adjustment and rising foreign public debt are storing up sustainability worries. Weather troubles, such as drought in the Pampa region, could undermine the harvest, hitting exports and worsening the trade deficit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document