scholarly journals P6075Comparison of P2Y12 inhibitors in atrial fibrillation patients treated by dual-antiplatelet therapy without oral anticoagulant after acute myocardial infarction with percutaneous coronary intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K H Lee ◽  
H W Park ◽  
H K Jeong ◽  
N S Yoon ◽  
J G Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

P2Y12 inhibitors monotherapy after short course of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials including 29 089 patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Bianco ◽  
Alessandro Careggio ◽  
Paola Destefanis ◽  
Alessia Luciano ◽  
Maria Giulia Perrelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Abstract Aims Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the incidence of thrombotic complications at the cost of an increase in bleedings. New antiplatelet therapies focused on minimizing bleeding and maximizing antithrombotic effects are emerging. The aim of this study is to collect the current evidence coming from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on early aspirin interruption after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and current drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and to perform a meta-analysis in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this strategy. Methods and results MEDLINE/PubMed was systematically screened for RCTs comparing P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12i) monotherapy after a maximum of 3 months of DAPT (S-DAPT) vs. DAPT for 12 months (DAPT) in patients undergoing PCI with DES. Baseline features were appraised. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: all causes of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and its single composites, stent thrombosis (ST) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 were considered and pooled with fixed and random-effects with inverse-variance weighting. A total of four RCTs including a total of 29 089 patients were identified. Overall, the majority of included patients suffered a stable coronary artery disease, while ST-elevation myocardial infarction was the least represented clinical presentation. Complex anatomical settings like left main intervention, bifurcations, and multi-lesions treatment were included although representing a minor part of the cases. At 1-year follow-up, MACCE rate was similar [odds ratio (OR) 0.90; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.79–1.03] and any of its composites (all causes of death rate: OR 0.87; 95% CIs 0.71–1.06; myocardial infarction: OR 1.06; 95% CIs 0.90–1.26; stroke: OR 1.12; 95% CIs 0.82–1.53). Similarly, also ST rate was comparable in the two groups (OR 1.17; 95% CIs 0.83–1.64), while BARC 3 or 5 bleeding resulted significantly lower, adopting an S-DAPT strategy (OR 0.70; 95% CIs 0.58–0.86). Conclusion After a PCI with current DES, an S-DAPT strategy followed by a P2Y12i monotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding compared to 12 months DAPT, with no significant differences in terms of 1-year cardiovascular events.

P1931Effect of de-escalated switching dual antiplatelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: real-world data from a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-Y Hsu ◽  
J.-S Yeh ◽  
C.-Y Huang
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Platelet Function ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Function Testing

Abstract Background Recently, both unguided (platelet function testing independent) and guided (platelet function testing dependent) DAPT de-escalation strategies have been investigated in different clinical studies but the data is still limited and conflicting. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on the major vascular risk after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by using Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Methods In total, 1,903 and 4,059 patients defined as switched to aspirin and clopidogrel (switched DAPT) and continuation of aspirin and ticagrelor (unswitched DAPT) cohort, respectively who had received PCI during AMI hospitalization, on aspirin and ticagrelor initially and without occurring adverse events at 3 months were evaluated between 2013 and 2015. An inverse probability treatment of weighted approach was adopted to balance the baseline differences between two groups and Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk regression were used to evaluated the effect of switching DAPT on death, AMI readmission, major bleeding and non-major clinically relevant bleeding. Results The incidence rates (per 100 person-year) of death and AMI readmission were 3.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.19–4.84) and 3.84 (95% CI = 3.09–4.73) in switched cohort and 1.83 (95% CI = 1.47–2.24) and 2.23 (95% CI = 1.82–2.68) in unswitched cohort, respectively. After adjustment for patients' clinical variables, switched cohort had higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.62–2.93, P<0.001), and AMI readmission (adjusted sub-distribution ratio = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.27–2.34, P<0.001) compared to these in unswitched cohort; however, there was no difference in the risk of bleeding. Subgroup analysis showed a similar findings in many specific groups, except the patients who were younger age and had lower comorbidity score. Conclusion Switching DAPT might increase the risk of death and AMI readmission among patients with AMI undergoing PCI.

Ischemic stroke rates decrease with increased ticagrelor use after acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1219-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Ulvenstam ◽  
Robin Henriksson ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Thomas Mooe
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Second Period

Aims It is unknown whether dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel reduces the risk of ischaemic stroke in acute myocardial infarction patients that undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. This study investigated whether the introduction of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor was associated with reduced ischaemic stroke risk in a real-world population. Methods and results Patients with ischaemic stroke after acute myocardial infarction from 8 December 2009–31 December 2013 were identified using the Register for Information and Knowledge on Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions and the Swedish National Patient Register. The study period was divided into two similar periods using the date of the first prescription of ticagrelor as the cut-off. The risk of ischaemic stroke in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated acute myocardial infarction patients during the first period (100% clopidogrel treatment) versus the second period (60.7% ticagrelor treatment) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Variables associated with ischaemic stroke were identified using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. There were 686 ischaemic stroke events (2.0%) among 34931 percutaneous coronary intervention-treated acute myocardial infarction patients within one year, 366 (2.2%) during the first period and 320 (1.8%) during the second period ( p = 0.004). The Cox model showed a 21% relative risk reduction in ischaemic stroke in the second period versus the first one (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.92; p = 0.003). The independent predictors of increased stroke risk were older age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, heart failure during hospitalization, previous ischaemic stroke, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Conclusion The risk of ischaemic stroke in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated acute myocardial infarction patients decreased after the introduction of ticagrelor in Sweden.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document