P3825Long-term prognostic value of growth differentiation factor-15 in acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O M Peiro Ibanez ◽  
J Ordonez ◽  
A Garcia ◽  
G Bonet ◽  
V Quintern ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Biomarkers plays a critical role in diagnostic, prognostication, and decision-making in cardiovascular medicine. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has been reported as a potential biomarker in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there is limited data on the long-term prognostic value after an ACS. Purpose To study the long-term prognostic value of GDF-15 in ACS. Methods We included patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography. During angiography an arterial blood sample was collected. Plasma GDF-15 were measured and clinical data and long-term events were obtained. As previously reported, risk categories were defined as low risk (<1200ng/L), intermediate (1200–1800ng/L) and high risk (>1800ng/L). Incremental prognostic value of GDF-15 for all-cause death was assessed on top of a clinical model (GRACE score, LVEF<40% and age). Results A total of 358 patients were included; 157 as a low risk, 85 as an intermediate and 116 as a high risk. The median (IQR) age was 65 (56–74) years and 27.4% were female. Of all patients, 61.5% were admitted with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 24.0% with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 14.5% with unstable angina. Higher values of GDF-15 were consistently associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. During 6 years of follow-up 54 patients died. Of those patients, 7 (4.5%) had values of GDF-15 below 1200ng/L, 6 (7.1%) between 1200–1800ng/L and 41 (35.3%) above 1800ng/L. After adjustment for a multivariate Cox regression model, GDF-15 >1800ng/L were independently associated with all-cause death (HR 4.5; 95% CI 1.8–11.6; p=0.002) and the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which were identified as all-cause death, nonfatal MI and heart failure (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4–4.4; p=0.001). For long-term all-cause death a significant increase of the c-statistic was seen after addition of GDF-15 to the clinical model 0.871 (95% CI 0.817–0.924; p=0.019) as well as net reclassification improvement (0.769; 95% CI 0.487–1.051; p<0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.117; 95% CI 0.062–0.172; p<0.001). Of 18 events of heart failure, 17 occurred in patients with GDF>1800ng/L. A multivariate competing risk model showed a significant association between GDF-15>1800ng/L and incidence of heart failure (adjusted HR 30.8; 95% CI 4.1–231.5; p=0.001) but non-significant association were found for myocardial infarction. KM figures and all-cause death ROC curve Conclusions In the setting of ACS GDF-15 can predict long-term all-cause death, MACE and heart failure and provides incremental prognostic value beyond traditional risks factors in the long-term all-cause death.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Garcia Acuna ◽  
A Cordero Fort ◽  
A Martinez ◽  
P Antunez ◽  
M Perez Dominguez ◽  
...  

Abstract The new European Society of Cardiology guideline for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction recommends that left and right bundle branch block should be considered equal for recommending urgent angiography in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. This consideration is not taken into account in the management of patients with coronary syndrome without ST elevation (NSTEMI). We evaluate the evolution of patients with acute coronary syndrome and long-term bundle branch block. Patients and methods We included 8771 patients admitted to two tertiary hospitals between 2003 and 2017 with an acute coronary syndrome, 5673 NSTEMI (64.3%) and 3098 STEMI (35.7%). All patients had an ECG recorded immediately upon admission. Patients were classified as having right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB). Long-term follow-up was performed (median 55 months) to assess mortality. Results A total of 8771 patients were included with a mean age of 66.1 years, 72.5% males, 4.1% (362) with LBBB and 5% (440) with RBBB. Patients with BBB were older, with more previous history of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization and higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Medical treatment was similar but they were less often submitted to angioplasty. During the acute phase, patients with RBBB and LBBB presented a higher rate of heart failure than those without branch block (4.8% vs 9.1% vs 3.5%, p=0.0001); higher mortality (8.4% vs 10.5% vs 3.0%, p=0.0001); higher stroke rate (2.5% vs 1.4% vs 0.8%, p=0.001); higher rate of renal failure (8.2% vs 9.7% vs 3.9%, p=0.0001) and higher rate of reinfarction (3.0% vs 4.1% vs 1.7%, p=0.001). Patients who had a RBBB or an LBBB had a worse prognosis throughout the follow-up. Heart failure was present in 17.7% of the group with RBBB, 29.6% of LBBB and 11% in the group without branch block (p=0.0001). Mortality during follow-up was 31% in RBBB, 40.6% in LBBB and 18.7% without branch block (p=0.0001). In multivariate analysis of Cox, both RBBB (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.98, p=0.0001) and LBBB (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.22–1.53, p=0.001) were an independent predictors of all-cause mortality (adjustment for GRACE score, gender, treatment with betablockers, angiotensin conversor enzym inhibitors, statin and coronary revascularization). Cox regression model multivariate Conclusions The presence of RBBB or LBBB in the ECG of patients with an ACS is associated with a worse prognosis both during the hospital phase and in the long term. In addition, both bundle branch blocks are independent predictors of long-term mortality in patients with ACS.


Author(s):  
Hesham Mohammed El Ashmawy ◽  
Mohammed Ahmed Sadaka ◽  
Gehan Magdy Youssef ◽  
Abdulkarem Saeed Hassan

Introduction: N-Terminal pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro BNP) is an important biomarker in the management of patients with heart failure. Several studies reported its importance as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients. Aim: To compare serum NT-proBNP levels in Non ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients and controls and to assess the relation between Nt-proBNP and the severity of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in patients with NSTE-ACS including unstable Angina (UA) and Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI). Materials and Methods: Sixty NSTE-ACS patients and 20 matched control without significant obstructive CAD were included in the study. Cardiac enzymes, blood urea, serum creatinine, serum NT-proBNP were measured in all patients immediately before coronary angiography. Gensini score and Syntax score were calculated for all study patients. The NSTE-ACS patients were followed-up for six months for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) including mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, revascularisation by primary percutaneous coronary intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). Results: The mean serum NT-proBNP in NSTE-ACS (UA and NSTEMI) patients was significantly higher (662.7±635.2) pg/mL than that in the control (102.3±96.4) pg/mL, p<0.001. The effective cut-off value for the diagnosis of CAD was 139 pg/mL, Area Under Curve (AUC)=0.950, 95% CI: 0.890-1.00). The serum NT-proBNP was correlated with the severity and complexity of CAD as measured by Gensini score (r=0.496, p<0.001) and Syntax score (r=0.443, p<0.001). The mean value of NT-proBNP in patients with six months MACE was insignificantly higher than in patients without six months MACE with Interquartile Range (IQR) of 418.5 (139-2037) vs. 366 (175-3237) pg/mL, p=0.970. Conclusion: NT-proBNP was correlated with the severity and complexity of CAD in NSTE-ACS with preserved left ventricular systolic function, but it has no impact on six months MACE.


2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Jiménez-Candil ◽  
Ignacio Cruz González ◽  
José M. González Matas ◽  
Carmen Albarrán ◽  
Pedro Pabón ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document