P4156Coexistence and prognostic impacts of epicardial and microvascular coronary dysfunctions in patients with chest pain and unobstructive coronary artery disease - Involvement of Rho-kinase activation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Suda ◽  
J Takahashi ◽  
K Hao ◽  
Y Kikuchi ◽  
T Shindo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although the importance of coronary functional abnormalities has been emerging, including epicardial coronary spasm (vasospastic angina, VSA) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), comprehensive evaluation of the abnormalities in the same population remains to be examined. Purpose We examined the significance of coronary functional abnormalities in a comprehensive manner for both epicardial and microvascular coronary arteries in patients with chest pain and unobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as their prognostic impacts. Methods and results We prospectively enrolled 187 consecutive patients with suspected angina and unobstructive coronary arteries (M/F 113/74, 63.2±12.3 [SD] yrs.). We performed acetylcholine (ACh) provocation tests for coronary spasm, followed by functional tests for coronary microvascular function, including coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculation resistance (IMR) during hyperemic state induced by intravenous adenosine. Among the 187 patients, ACh test identified 128 patients with VSA (68%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or prevalence of traditional coronary risk factors between the non-VSA and the VSA groups. The median IMR value was significantly higher in the VSA group than in the non-VSA group [17.5 (12.0, 25.3) vs. 14.7 (10.7, 17.8), P=0.02], whereas CFR values were comparable between the 2 groups [2.51 (1.72, 3.35) vs. 2.66 (1.85, 3.64), P=0.34]. During the median follow-up period of 893 days, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to unstable angina pectoris, occurred in 10 patients (5.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed that IMR correlated with the incidence of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval), 1.05 (1.02–1.09), P=0.002] and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis identified IMR of 18.0 as the optimal cut-off value for the incidence of cardiac events. When we divided the patients into the following 4 groups according to the cut-off value of IMR (>18) and the presence or absence of VSA; G1, IMR <18 without VSA (n=45); G2, IMR ≥18 without VSA (n=14); G3, IMR <18 with VSA (n=67); and G4, IMR ≥18 with VSA (n=61), the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly worse prognosis in G4 compared with other 3 groups (HR [95% CI] 6.23 [1.21–118.46], P=0.002) (Figure 1). Importantly, intracoronary administration of fasudil, a Rho-kinase inhibitor, significantly ameliorated IMR in G4 (P<0.0001) (Figure 2A), and %changes in IMR in response to intracoronary fasudil were more evident in G4 compared with other 3 groups (P<0.0001) (Figure 2B). Conclusions These results provide the first evidence that in patients with chest pain and unobstructive CAD, epicardial coronary spasm and increased microvascular resistance are frequently coexisted with worse long-term prognosis, for which Rho-kinase activationmay be involved.

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-321
Author(s):  
Amirreza Sajjadieh Khajouei ◽  
Atoosa Adibi ◽  
Zahra Maghsodi ◽  
Majid Nejati ◽  
Mohaddeseh Behjati

Introduction: The advent of multi-slice computed tomography (CT) technology has provided a new promising tool for non-invasive assessment of the coronary arteries. However, as the prognostic outcome of patients with normal or non-significant finding on computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is not well-known, this study was aimed to determine the prognostic value of CTCA in patients with either normal or non-significant CTCA findings.|<br /> Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who were referred for CTCA to the hospital. 527 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), who had undergone CTCA within one year were enrolled. Among them, data of 465 patients who had normal (no stenosis, n=362) or non-significant CTCA findings (stenosis <50% of luminal narrowing, n=103) were analyzed and prevalence of cardiac risk factors and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were compared between these groups. In addition, a correlation between these factors and the number of involved coronary arteries was also determined. <br /> Results: After a mean follow-up duration of 13.11±4.63 months, all cases were alive except for three patients who died by non-cardiac events. Prevalence of MACE was 0% and 3% in normal CTCA group and non-significant groups, respectively. There was no correlation found between the number of involved coronary arteries and the prevalence of MACE (P = 0.57). <br /> Conclusion: A normal CTCA could be associated with extremely low risk of MACE over the first year after the initial imaging, whereas non-significant obstruction in coronary arteries may be associated with a slightly higher risk of MACE.


Author(s):  
Sivabaskari Pasupathy ◽  
Rosanna Tavella ◽  
Margaret Arstall ◽  
Derek Chew ◽  
Matthew Worthley ◽  
...  

Background: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is being increasingly recognized with the frequent use of angiography following Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI); yet there is little evaluation of these patients in the literature. The current study is a prospective, contemporary analysis of clinical features and chest pain characteristics between patients with MINOCA and Myocardial Infarction with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for AMI (as per the Third Universal AMI Definition) in South Australian public hospitals from January 2012 - December 2013 were included. Data was captured by Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia (CADOSA), a comprehensive registry compatible with the NCDR ® CathPCI ® Registry. The AMI patients were classified as MI-CAD or MINOCA on the basis of the presence or absence of a significant stenosis (≥50%) on angiography. Results: From 3,431 angiography procedures undertaken for AMI, 359 (11%) were classified as MINOCA. MINOCA patients were younger (59 ± 15 vs. 64 ± 13, p <0.01) and more likely to be female (60% vs. 26%, p<0.01), with age adjusted analysis revealing less cardiovascular risk factors in MINOCA compared to MICAD: current smoker (21% vs. 35%, p< 0.01), hypertension (56% vs. 65%, p<0.01), dyslipidaemia (46% vs. 61%, p<0.01), and diabetes (20% vs. 32%, p<0.01). Analysis of presenting chest pain characteristics showed no significant differences between MICAD and MINOCA for the presence of retrosternal pain (81% vs. 82%, p>0.05,) or shoulder pain (27% vs. 26%, p>0.05) respectively, however MINOCA patients were less likely to experience arm pain (33% vs. 40%, p<0.01). In regards to precipitating factors, emotional stress was more common (14% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and exertion related chest pain was less common (27% vs. 40%, p<0.001) in MINOCA patients. Quality of pain for MINOCA and MICAD was similar with the most frequent descriptors being burning (11% vs. 9%, p>0.05), sharp 21% vs. 23%, p>0.05) and tightness (41% vs. 44%, p>0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences observed between groups in relieving factors and duration of chest pain Conclusions: In contemporary cardiology practice, MINOCA presentation is more common than previously appreciated, with younger women frequently implicated. Delineating a MINOCA patient from MICAD on the basis of chest pain characteristics is not feasible.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philopatir Mikhail ◽  
James Rogers ◽  
Cecily Forsyth ◽  
Thomas J Ford

Abstract Background Coronary vasospasm is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction or myocardial ischaemia in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. A thorough medication review may identify drugs or toxins that could trigger coronary vasospasm. This case provides mechanistic insight into the off-target effect of proteasome inhibition leading to coronary vasospasm in a patient referred with chest pain consistent with typical angina. Case summary A 72-year-old lady presented with anginal chest pain at rest with electrocardiogram evidence of myocardial ischaemia who was referred for invasive coronary angiography. This demonstrated minor coronary disease without an obstructive lesion. Vasoreactivity testing revealed diffuse coronary vasospasm of the left anterior descending artery. Carfilzomib was identified as the trigger for coronary vasospasm. Symptoms resolved without recurrence after appropriate treatment including cessation of the triggering agent. Conclusion Coronary spasm is a rare but important adverse reaction to proteasome inhibitors. This case supports the clinical utility of invasive coronary vasoreactivity testing in patients with ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1113) ◽  
pp. 20190881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marly van Assen ◽  
Dirk Jan Kuijpers ◽  
Juerg Schwitter

Perfusion-cardiovascular MR (CMR) imaging has been shown to reliably identify patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), who are at risk for future cardiac events and thus, allows for guiding therapy including revascularizations. Accordingly, it is an ideal test to exclude prognostically relevant coronary artery disease. Several guidelines, such as the ESC guidelines, currently recommend CMR as non-invasive testing in patients with stable chest pain. CMR has as an advantage over the more conventional pathways as it lacks radiation and it potentially reduces costs.


Author(s):  
Shozo Sueda ◽  
Tomoki Sakaue

Abstract Background Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) testing is useful for the detection of epicardial spasm (ES) and coronary microvascular spasm (CMS). Objectives We retrospectively analysed the incidence of ES and CMS in consecutive Japanese patients with unobstructed coronary artery disease. Methods From January 1991 to February 2019, we performed intracoronary ACh testing of 1864 patients. Among these patients, a total of 746 consecutive patients (254 women, mean age 64±11 years) who underwent first diagnostic angiography for suspected myocardial ischaemia and had unobstructed coronary arteries (&lt; 50%) were enrolled. ES was defined as ≥ 90% stenosis and usual chest symptoms and ischaemic ECG changes, while CMS was defined as &lt; 75% stenosis and usual chest symptoms and ischaemic ECG changes. Results We performed intracoronary ACh testing on both coronary arteries in 96% (716/746) of all subjects. Overall, ES was found in 329 patients (44%), whereas CMS was revealed in 40 patients (5%) including 4 patients with coexisting ES. In patients with ES, women made up 22%, and approximately three-quarters of the patients had resting chest pain. In contrast, women composed 65% (26/40) of those with CMS, and 15 patients with CMS had another chest symptom. CMS was frequently observed in the LCA but not the RCA. Electrical cardioversion was necessary for two patients. Conclusions CMS was recognized in only 5% of consecutive Japanese patients with unobstructed coronary artery disease, whereas ES was revealed in 44% of those patients. CMS was often observed in women and in the LCA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E.-S Im ◽  
I.-S Sohn

Abstract Purposes The aim of this study was to evaluate comparative clinical outcomes of discordant electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic (Echo) findings compared to concordant findings during treadmill exercise echocardiography in patients with chest pain and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods A total of 1725 consecutive patients who underwent treadmill echocardiography with chest pain and no history of CAD were screened. The patients were classified into four groups: ECG−/Echo− (negative ECG and Echo), ECG+/Echo− (positive ECG and negative Echo), ECG−/Echo+, and ECG+/Echo+. Concomitant CAD was determined using coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of coronary revascularization, acute myocardial infarction, and death. Results MACEs were similar between ECG−/Echo− and ECG+/Echo− groups. Compared to ECG+/Echo− group, ECG−/Echo+ group had more MACEs [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) adjusted by clinical risk factors (95% confidence interval), 3.57 (1.75–7.29), p<0.001]. Compared with ECG+/Echo+ group, ECG−/Echo+ group had lower prevalence of concomitant CAD and fewer MACEs [HR, 0.49 (0.29–0.81), p=0.006]. Conclusions Positive exercise Echo alone during treadmill exercise echocardiography had worse clinical outcomes than positive ECG alone, and the latter had similar outcomes to both negative ECG and Echo. Positive exercise Echo alone also had better clinical outcomes than both positive ECG and Echo. Therefore, exercise Echo findings might be superior for predicting clinical outcomes compared to exercise ECG findings. Additional consideration of ECG findings on positive exercise Echo will also facilitate better prediction of clinical outcomes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document