Periprocedural safety and efficacy after left atrial appendage closure in a large UK tertiary centre: 10-year experience

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus is responsible for up 90% of atrial fibrillation (AF) related ischaemic strokes. Mechanical closure of the LAA is an alternative stroke prevention strategy in patients with non-valvular AF who are at a high risk of bleeding. LAA morphology is highly variable which may affect acute procedural success rates. Purpose This study sought to examine the periprocedural safety and efficacy, and short-term outcomes in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device implantation in a large UK tertiary centre. Methods This retrospective study included all patients listed for a LAAO device in our institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical notes, procedural and imaging reports were reviewed and adverse event rates were calculated at discharge, 30 and 90 days. A Cox regression model was used for multivariable analysis with pre-specified covariates to assess outcomes at 90 days. Results Of 237 patients listed for a LAAO device, 8 (3.4%) had a LAA thrombus and the procedure was abandoned (4 had a successful implant at a later date). In 225 (94.9%) patients a LAAO device was implanted and 4 (1.7%) had unsuitable anatomy precluding device deployment. Seventy-two percent were male, age 74 ± 8 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/m2, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.4 ± 1.2, HASBLED score 3.2 ± 0.8 and at high risk of stroke (98 ischaemic strokes and 129 haemorrhagic strokes) and bleeding (151 major or life-threatening bleeding episodes). The mean procedural and fluoroscopy time were 52.5 ± 30.5 and 8.0 ± 5.9 minutes, respectively. Three different LAAO devices were used (136 Watchman, 54 Watchman FLX and 35 Amplatzer Cardiac Plug) with no significant difference in acute procedural success (97.8%, 98.2% and 94.4%, p = 0.41, respectively). Complete seal was achieved in 202 (92%) patients with only 1 (0.4%) moderate leak. Procedure-related mortality was 1.3% and non-fatal serious adverse events occurred in 5 (2.1%) patients. At 90 days, 28 patients experienced an adverse event (KM 12.5%; 95% CI, 8%-16.1%) and 16 patients suffered a serious adverse event (KM 7.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-10.4%). In a covariate-adjusted Cox model, CHA2DS2-VASc score less than 4 had hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.06 -0.71, p = 0.01) for serious events at 90 days. Conclusion The acute procedural success rate was high (97%) with a low number of periprocedural complications. Serious adverse events at both 30 and 90-days were low in keeping with other published registries. Abstract Figure.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage closure in a large UK tertiary centre: 10-year experience

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euab116.283 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

A Briosa E Gala ◽

MTB Pope ◽

C Monteiro ◽

M Leo ◽

TR Betts

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Tertiary Centre ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a well-established stroke prevention strategy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and high risk of bleeding or contra-indication to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Despite encouraging randomised control trial and international registry safety and efficacy data, long-term outcome data remains sparce. Purpose This study sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes in ‘real-world’ AF patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion in a large UK tertiary centre. Methods This retrospective study included all patients that had a LAAO device implanted in our institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical notes, electronic patient records, procedural and imaging reports were reviewed. Annual bleeding risk was extrapolated from the Swedish National Cohort study according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score. Results During the study period a total of 225 patients underwent LAAO device implant. Seventy-two percent were male, age 74 ± 8 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/m2, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.4 ± 1.2, HASBLED score 3.2 ± 0.8 and at high risk of stroke (98 ischaemic strokes and 129 haemorrhagic strokes) and bleeding (151 life-threatening bleeding episodes). Three different LAAO devices were used: 136 Watchman, 54 Watchman FLX and 35 Amplatzer Cardiac plugs. Three patients (1.3%) had fatal complications related to the procedure. At discharge, 10% were taking single antiplatelet (ATP), 79% dual-antiplatelet (DAPT), 1.4% OAC, 3.6% ATP and OAC, 3.1% DAPT and OAC, 1.3% were not taking any anti-thrombotic. Nine (4%) patients had device-related thrombus on follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography with no significant difference between devices (5.0%, 2.8% and 6.7% p = 0.8, respectively) and anticoagulation strategy (p = 0.7). Over a total follow-up of 889 patient-years (mean follow-up 3.9 ± 3.7 years), 24 (10.4%) patients died, 55 patients (6.2/100 patient-years) suffered an adverse event, 15 ischaemic strokes (1.7/100 patient-years) and 20 non-procedural major bleeding episodes (2.3/100 patient-years) occurred. Compared to estimated annual stroke and bleeding risk adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score, our cohort had a 79% and 65% relative risk reduction in ischaemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively. Conclusion In this cohort of "real-world" high-risk patients, major bleeding and thromboembolic rate remained low on long-term follow-up. Abstract Figure 1

Download Full-text

Abstract 16527: Peri-Procedural and 45-Day Outcomes in the Roll-In Cohort of the Amplatzer Amulet Ide Trial of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.16527 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Rakesh Gopinathannair ◽

Scott M Koerber ◽

Krishna Akella ◽

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

High Risk ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Watchman Device ◽

Major Adverse Events

Background: The Amulet IDE trial is an ongoing, randomized, worldwide trial, enrolled but following patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of stroke. The study is comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ left atrial appendage (LAA) Occluder to the Watchman device. At US sites, the implanting physicians only had experience with the Watchman device; therefore, up to three roll-in subjects with Amplatzer Amulet device implantation were permitted prior to randomization. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the peri-procedural outcomes for the roll-in cohort. Methods: Roll-in subjects met the same eligibility criteria and have the same data collection requirements as randomized subjects. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee and LAA occlusion was assessed by an independent core laboratory based on the 45-day TEE. Major adverse events included all cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism or device-/procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention within 7 days post implant or hospital discharge, whichever is later. Results: From August 2016 to November 2018, 201 patients with non-valvular AF at high risk of stroke and bleeding were enrolled at 82 sites as roll-in subjects. Mean age was 74.2 ± 7.5 years and 62% of subjects were male. The Amplatzer Amulet device was successfully deployed in 99% of subjects. Major adverse events within 7 days or hospital discharge occurred in 2.5% of patients and included death (n=3), ischemic stroke (n=1) and vascular access site bleeding (n=1). The majority (79%) of patients were discharged on antiplatelet therapy only or no anti-thrombotic medication. TEE follow-up at the 45-day visit revealed adequate (≤ 5 mm jet) occlusion of the appendage in 98.9% (178/180) of patients. Device-related thrombus (DRT) was identified by the core laboratory in 6 patients (3%); no patient experienced a thrombo-embolic event. Conclusions: In the roll-in cohort, with implanting physicians having no prior experience using the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device, there was a low rate of procedural complications and high rates of both implant success and adequate LAA sealing at follow up.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes and periprocedural safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in a UK tertiary centre: 11-year experience

Heart Rhythm ◽

10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.1170 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Andre Briosa e Gala ◽

Michael TB. Pope ◽

Cristiana Monteiro ◽

Milena Leo ◽

Sam Dawkins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Tertiary Centre

Download Full-text

Outcome of left atrial appendage occlusion in high-risk patients

Heart ◽

10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312383 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 104 (7) ◽

pp. 594-599 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ahmed Masoud ◽

Stefano Bartoletti ◽

Timothy Fairbairn ◽

Ayush Khurana ◽

Periaswamy Velavan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Stroke Prevention ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Risk Patients

ObjectivePercutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion can be an interventional alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe delivered LAA occlusion therapy using a standardised approach to patient referral, multidisciplinary team assessment, implant criteria, imaging and follow-up. We analysed patient characteristics, efficacy and safety of the implant procedure, and 12-month outcomes.ResultsOf 143 referrals from October 2014 to December 2016, 83 patients (age 76±8years, 32.5% female, mean CHAD2S2-VASc score 4 ±1) were offered LAA occlusion. Eighty (95.3%) had previous major bleeding (intracranial in 59%). LAA occluder implantation with an Amulet device was successful in 82 (98.8%), with periprocedural major adverse events occurring in 5 (6.0%) patients (2 device embolisations including 1 death, 2 major bleeds). Cardiac imaging in 75 (94%) patients 2months following implant showed device-related thrombus in 1 case (1.3%) and minor (<5mm) device leaks in 13 (17.1%). Over a median 12-month follow-up, 3 (3.8%) ischaemic strokes, 2 (2.5%) haemorrhagic strokes and 5 (6.3%) major extracranial bleeds occurred. All-cause mortality was 10%, with most deaths (7, 87.5%) due to non-cardiovascular causes.ConclusionsLAA occlusion may be a reasonable option for stroke prevention inhigh-risk patients with atrial fibrillation ineligible for anticoagulation. However, procedural complication rates are not insignificant, and patients remain at risk of serious adverse events and death even after successful implant.

Download Full-text

Length of stay following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Data from the prospective, multicenter Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0255721 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (8) ◽

pp. e0255721

Author(s):

Kerstin Piayda ◽

Shazia Afzal ◽

Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk ◽

Boris Schmidt ◽

Patrizio Mazzone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Observational Study ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Aims To evaluate factors influencing the length of stay in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Methods and results Patient characteristics, procedural data and the occurrence of serious adverse events were analyzed from the AmplatzerTM AmuletTM Occluder Observational Study. Patients were divided into three groups: same day (S, 0day, n = 60, 5.6%) early (E, 1day, n = 526, 48.9%), regular (R, 2-3days, n = 338, 31.4%) and late (L, ≥4days, n = 152, 14.1%) discharge and followed up for 60 days. Procedure and device related SAE during the in-hospital stay (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 2.1% vs. L: 23%, p<0.0001) were a major trigger for a prolonged in-hospital stay. Of the 37 subjects in the late discharge group with an SAE prior to discharge, cardiac or bleeding complications were the most common underlying conditions, occurring in 26 subjects. Multinomial logistic analysis only identified HAS-BLED score as an independent influencing factor (p = 0.04) for a late discharge. After 60 days, mortality tended to be greatest in the late discharge group (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 1.2% vs. L: 3.3%, p = 0.1066). Conclusion Over half of the subjects receiving an Amplatzer Amulet occluder were discharged within 1 day of the implant procedure. Serious adverse events were a major trigger for a late discharge after LAAO. Increased HAS-BLED score was associated with a prolonged in-hospital stay.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the LAmbre Device

Journal of Interventional Cardiology ◽

10.1155/2020/6613683 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Guangji Wang ◽

Bin Kong ◽

Yu Liu ◽

He Huang

Keyword(s):

Left Atrial ◽

Large Scale ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Perioperative Period ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽

Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Procedural Success

Background. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the LAmbre device has been associated with prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we interrogated the long-term safety and efficacy of using the LAmbre device in percutaneous LAAC. Methods. We analyzed 56 records of patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing LAAC procedures with the LAmbre device. We collected and analyzed the data to define the safety and efficacy of the LAmbre device implantation. Result. The LAAC was successfully occluded in the 56 patients. Our data showed no serious residual leak or pericardial effusion occurred during the perioperative period. At a mean follow-up of 37.8 ± 23.5 months, there were 7.1%, 3.6%, and 3.6% rates of death, stroke, and device-related thrombus, respectively. There were no cases of severe residual leak or systemic embolism. Conclusion. Taken together, we demonstrate that execution of LAAC with the LAmbre device has high procedural success and prevents AF-related stroke. However, further large-scale trials might be required to confirm our findings.

Download Full-text