scholarly journals Subacute implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead perforation: a potentially life-threatening event

EP Europace ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 966-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tavernier ◽  
M. Duytschaever ◽  
K. Dossche ◽  
D. Verleyen ◽  
F. Van Den Brande ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Danielle R Hairston ◽  
Ralph H de Similien ◽  
Seth Himelhoch ◽  
Anique Forrester

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have become standard preventive treatment for patients with ventricular arrhythmias and other life-threatening cardiac conditions. The advantages and efficiency of the device are supported by multiple clinical trials and outcome studies, leading to its popularity among cardiologists. Implantation of the device is not without adverse outcomes. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement has been found to lead to negative psychological and psychosocial sequelae such as apprehension to engage in physical activity, chronic anxiety, decreased physical and social functioning, a nagging fear of being shocked by the device, and the development of “phantom shocks.” Defined as patient-reported shocks in the absence of evidence that the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device has discharged, phantom shocks could impact the mental health of those affected. This article reviews the case of Mr. L, a 47-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy who was seen by the psychiatry consultation team while under cardiologic care because he reported that his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device had been shocking him despite no objective evidence after interrogating the device. A literature review of phantom shocks, their associated symptomatology, and psychological consequences are outlined and discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document