scholarly journals 42Atrial fibrillation ablation as a day-case procedure: three-year single-centre experience

EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i19-i19 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Bartoletti ◽  
M Mann ◽  
A Khan ◽  
A Sahni ◽  
M El-Kadri ◽  
...  
Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A273.1-A273
Author(s):  
L Tobin ◽  
O D Patani ◽  
S Hood ◽  
R Sturgess ◽  
N Stern

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Kirk Bowling ◽  
Samantha Leong ◽  
Sarah El-Badawy ◽  
Erfan Massri ◽  
Jaideep Rait ◽  
...  

Aim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patients with a high BMI can undergo safe day case LC for cholecystitis compared to groups of patients with a lower BMI. Setting. NHS District General Hospital, UK. Methods. A retrospective review of 2391 patients who underwent an attempted day case LC between 1 January 2009 and 15 August 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into five groups depending on their BMI. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholecystitis on histology. The endpoints were complication requiring readmission and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Results. There were 2391 LCs performed in the time period of which 1646 were eligible for inclusion. These LCs were classified as 273 (16.9%), 608 (37.8%), 428 (26.6%), 208 (12.9%), and 91 (5.66%) patients in the groups with BMI values of 18.5–24.9, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, 35–39.9, and >40, respectively. Average BMI was 30.0 (±5.53, 19–51) with an average postoperative LOS of 0.86, and there was no difference between the BMI groups. Overall complication rate was 4.3%; there was no significance between BMI groups. Conclusions. Increased BMI was not associated with worse outcomes after day case LC.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1559-1563 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Carrington ◽  
A. Williams ◽  
D. F. Griffiths ◽  
S. G. Riley ◽  
K. L. Donovan

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Michel ◽  
Fabio Stocco ◽  
Farihah Khaliq ◽  
Abdullah Bin Sahl ◽  
Annabel Stachan ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To quantify the impact Covid-19 has had on vascular surgery during the pandemic at our unit compared to previous operating activity levels at a single vascular centre. Methods Retrospective analysis of all vascular operations undertaken in the department dating from 11th March 2020 to 16th November 2020. Historical average data (HD) from the previous five years (2015-2019) over the same timeframe were then collected for comparison. Results During the Covid-19 pandemic 237 vascular operations were performed which represented a 48% operative reduction compared to average HD (454). 57 elective day-case procedures (varicose veins/temporal artery biopsies/renal access) were performed compared to a median of 259 from HD. Varicose vein surgery had an 79% reduction (37 vs 180). Renal access surgery was unaffected (15 vs 9). Major limb revascularisation procedures were reduced by 41% (36 vs 61) however this did not equate to any increase in amputation rates (79 vs 84). There was no reduction in carotid procedures performed during the pandemic (26 vs 30). There was a 60% (14 vs 35) reduction in all types of aneurysm procedures. Conclusion The Covid-19 pandemic has dramatically affected vascular surgery at our unit. In terms of arterial work the largest disparities compared to previous years was major revascularisation and aneurysm surgery. In respect to elective day case procedures, venous work has unsurprisingly been hardest hit which, once resources allow, will require significant provision to overcome the shortfall. This quantitative study can direct future service delivery and prepare for the post-pandemic recovery.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aruna Arujuna ◽  
Selvakumar Velu ◽  
Janaka Pathiraja ◽  
Andrew Lapper ◽  
Geoff Kidd ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S119
Author(s):  
S. Healy ◽  
L. Ling ◽  
D. Adam ◽  
J. Krafchek ◽  
E. Kotschet ◽  
...  

Nephrology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. A93-A93
Author(s):  
Herzig Ka ◽  
Juffs Hg ◽  
Brown Am ◽  
Gill D ◽  
Hawley Cm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document