scholarly journals Functional MRI to Assess Decision-Making Capacity of Older Adults With Dementia: A Proof of Concept Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 509-509
Author(s):  
Thomas Tannou

Abstract Assessment of decision-making capacity is essential to respect older adult dignity, particularly concerning major decision such as ageing in place. To date, it is the clinician's assessment, based on a global analysis of his clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tasks, which enables decision-making assessment. Given the difficulty it represents, and the ethical and societal issues raised, the research question concerns the contribution of neuro-imaging technologies as an aid to the evaluation of decision-making capacity. We included in our proof-of-concept study 4 healthy older patients and 2 older patients with dementia (mild stage) followed in a memory clinic. Each of the participants completed neuropsychological tests with a focus on executive functions, anosognosia and judgemental skills. Next, they performed a decision-making task, the Balloon Assessment Risk Task (BART) in functional MRI, and, finally, they participated in a semi-structured interview completed with interview of their caregiver. For both patients, their referring geriatrician was questioned a priori on his assessment of their decision-making capacity. The results showed a common activation pattern in functional MRI between the patient considered competent in decision-making and the healthy subjects, unlike the patient who was not clinically competent. The qualitative analysis highlighted major anosognosia in both pathological situations, but decision-making in everyday life situations differed between the 2 patients. This study shows the feasibility, on a sensitive topic, to explore the potential contribution of functional neuroimaging and semi-directed interviews as tools. It also demonstrates the value of conducting mixed research, combining neurosciences and social science to explore complex clinical issues.

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Beatrix Brühl ◽  
Sigrid Scherpiet ◽  
James Sulzer ◽  
Philipp Stämpfli ◽  
Erich Seifritz ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e053549
Author(s):  
Thomas Tannou ◽  
Aurelie Godard-Marceau ◽  
Sven Joubert ◽  
Serge Daneault ◽  
Marie-Jeanne Kergoat ◽  
...  

IntroductionAssessment of decision-making capacity (DMC) is essential in daily life as well as for defining a person-centred care plan. Nevertheless, in ageing, especially if signs of dementia appear, it becomes difficult to assess decision-making ability and raises ethical questions. Currently, the assessment of DMC is based on the clinician’s evaluation, completed by neuropsychological tests. Functional MRI (fMRI) could bring added value to the diagnosis of DMC in difficult situations.Methods and analysisIMAGISION is a prospective, monocentric, single-arm study evaluating fMRI compared with clinical assessment of DMC. The study will begin during Fall 2021 and should be completed by Spring 2023. Participants will be recruited from a memory clinic where they will come for an assessment of their cognitive abilities due to decision-making needs to support ageing in place. They will be older people over 70 years of age, living at home, presenting with a diagnosis of mild dementia, and no exclusion criteria of MRI. They will be clinically assessed by a geriatrician on their DMC, based on the neuropsychological tests usually performed. Participants will then perform a behavioural task in fMRI (Balloon Analogue Risk Task) to analyse the activation areas. Additional semistructured interviews will be conducted to explore real life implications. The main analysis will study concordance/discordance between the clinical classification and the activation of fMRI regions of interest. Reclassification as ‘capable’, based on fMRI, of patients for whom clinical diagnosis is ‘questionable’ will be considered as a diagnostic gain.Ethics and disseminationIMAGISION has been authorised by a research ethics board (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Bordeaux, II) in France, in accordance with French legislation on interventional biomedical research, under the reference IDRCB number 2019-A00863-54, since 30 September 2020. Participants will sign an informed consent form. The results of the study will be presented in international peer-reviewed scientific journals, international scientific conferences and public lectures.Trial registration numberNCT03931148


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1529-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuo Akechi ◽  
Toru Okuyama ◽  
Megumi Uchida ◽  
Koji Sugano ◽  
Yosuke Kubota ◽  
...  

AbstractObject:This study investigates the usefulness of the Structured Interview for Competency and Incompetency Assessment Testing and Ranking Inventory (SICIATRI) for cancer patients, which is a structured interview that assesses a patient's competency in clinical practice.Methods:The SICIATRI, originally developed to measure patients' competency to give informed consent, were administered referred cancer patients who needed for assessing medical decision making capacity. The usefulness of the SICIATRI was investigated retrospectively. Recommendation for modification of the SICIATRI for cancer patients if applicable were made by the research team.Results:Among the 433 cancer patients referred for psychiatric consultation, 12 were administered the SICIATRI and all of the administration were conducted without big problems. All patients were 60 years or older. The most common purpose for competency evaluation was to analyze patients' understanding of the anti-cancer treatment proposed by oncologists, followed by their refusal of the treatment. Half of the patients (n = 6) were diagnosed with delirium and three among them were judged as having the most impaired status of a patient's competency. Two patients (17%) were diagnosed with major depression and another two (17%) were mental retardation and each one patient was diagnosed with dementia and past history of alcohol dependence. Among 6 patients without delirium 5 subjects including a dementia patient were judged as fully competent. Total of 5 small potential modifications of the SICIATRI for its use with Japanese cancer patients were recommended.Significance of results:Our experience suggests that the SICIATRI is a useful instrument for psycho-oncology clinical practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Hsiao ◽  
Pauline Binder‐Finnema ◽  
W. Benjamin Nowell ◽  
George Michel ◽  
Carole Wiedmeyer ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresia J.M. Roelofs ◽  
Jeroen P.H. Verharen ◽  
Geralda A.F. van Tilborg ◽  
Linde Boekhoudt ◽  
Annette van der Toorn ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovico Minati ◽  
Anna Nigri ◽  
Cristina Rosazza ◽  
Maria Grazia Bruzzone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document