scholarly journals Gender Differences in Mental and Physical Health: Implications for Aging With a Traumatic Brain Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 718-718
Author(s):  
Emma Swinford

Abstract Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability and death in the U.S., and survivors often experience temporary or life-long health effects as a result of their injury. While risks and outcomes of fall-related TBI in older adults have been well-documented, the intersection of TBI-related health challenges and the experience of aging with a TBI is less well understood. This project explores gender differences in health outcomes among TBI survivors. A Needs Assessment survey was conducted in early 2020 with adult TBI survivors in Missouri (n=150). The mean age of respondents was 46 and 58% identified as male. Bivariate analyses reveal gender differences in health conditions among TBI survivors before and after injury. Significantly more males than females reported substance use disorder for alcohol (20.7% and 7.9%, p < .05) prior to injury, whereas twice as many females reported developing chronic pain after injury than males (68.3% and 31.0%, p < .001). Further, while about 21% of both male and female respondents reported experiencing other mental health conditions, such as anxiety, prior to injury, over 35% of males and almost 58% of females experienced mental health concerns after injury. Additionally, balance/mobility issues, sleep disorders, sensory issues, and cognitive challenges were frequently identified post-injury conditions. Co-morbidities impact our experiences, capabilities, and quality of life as we age. Policies and programs to support TBI survivors and their families may better address the co-occurring health conditions among TBI survivors by considering gender differences in the experience of aging with a TBI.

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Sharma ◽  
Akhilesh Jain ◽  
Achal Sharma ◽  
R.S. Mittal ◽  
I.D. Gupta

Abstract Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of disability. Assessment and treatment of TBI typically focus on physical and cognitive impairments, yet psychological impairments represent significant causes of disability. Depression may be the most common and disabling psychiatric condition in individuals with TBI. Objective: This cross-sectional study was design to investigate prevalence and risk factors of depression in Traumatic brain injury (TBI). Material and method: The Group studied consists of 204 patients of mild and moderate TBI between 14-days to one-year post injury. Demographic characteristics of the participants were assessed on a self-designed semi structured performa. Interviews focused on assessment of severity of TBI, depression and quality of life (Qol) using GCS, PHQ-9 and WHOBREF-QOL respectively. Results: Total 204 patients were included. 42.15% participants were found to have depression. None of the demographic variables were associated with depression except female sex, severity and time since injury. Moderate TBI patient (55.80%) had significantly higher occurrence of depression than the mild cases (44.2%). Patients with lesser duration (time since injury) of TBI had high incidence (50.2%) of depression compare to longer duration of TBI. Depressed patients also had poor Qol than those without depression in all domains except physical health domain. Neuroanatomical localization was also correlated with depression. Cerebral contusions were the most common (44.24%) lesions associated with depression. Conclusion: Depression is commonly associated, yet under diagnosed clinical entities in head injury and have tremendous impact in overall outcome measures. Every patient of head injury warrants psychiatric evaluation and concomitant treatment if required to ensure the attainment of not only neuroanatomical intact but overall productive and qualitative life vindicating the holistic and multidisciplinary treatment approach.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Jaramillo ◽  
Douglas B. Cooper ◽  
Chen-Pin Wang ◽  
David F. Tate ◽  
Blessen C. Eapen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M. P. Poritz ◽  
Leia Vos ◽  
Esther Ngan ◽  
Luis Leon-Novelo ◽  
Mark Sherer

2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (8) ◽  
pp. 1636-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen H. Seal ◽  
Daniel Bertenthal ◽  
Deborah E. Barnes ◽  
Amy L. Byers ◽  
Irina Strigo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Powell ◽  
Alan Godfrey ◽  
Lucy Parrington ◽  
Kody R. Campbell ◽  
Laurie A. King ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Physical function remains a crucial component of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) assessment and recovery. Traditional approaches to assess mTBI lack sensitivity to subtle deficits post-injury, which can impact quality of life, daily function and can lead to chronic issues. Inertial measurement units (IMU) provide an objective alternative for measuring physical function of gait and turning and can be used in any environment. Our recent work has found that turning quality is more sensitive than the quantity of physical activity when comparing chronic mTBI and healthy controls. However, no studies have compared the quality of free-living gait and turning characteristics concurrently in chronic mTBI and healthy controls. This study aimed to determine whether free-living gait or turning is more sensitive in differentiating chronic mTBI from controls.Methods: Thirty-two people with chronic self-reported balance symptoms after mTBI (age: 40.88 ± 11.78 years, median days post injury: 440.68 days) and 23 healthy controls (age: 48.56 ± 22.56 years) were assessed for ~7 days using a single IMU at the waist on a belt. Free-living gait and turning characteristics were evaluated for chronic mTBI and controls using multi-variate analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis were used to determine outcome sensitivity to chronic mTBI.Results: Free-living gait characteristics were not different in chronic mTBI and controls (all p>0.05). In contrast, all but two (number of turns and average velocity CV) free-living turning characteristics were significantly different between chronic mTBI and controls, whilst controlling for age and sex (Bonferroni adjusted p<0.002). The chronic mTBI group had larger turn angles and longer turn durations compared to controls. ROC and AUC analysis showed turn duration (AUC = 0.92) was the most sensitive measure for differentiating chronic mTBI from controls. Conclusions: Results show that turning rather than gait characteristics were significantly different between chronic mTBI and controls, with turn duration being the most sensitive measure. These results suggest turning is a suitable surrogate biomarker to assess and monitor chronic mTBI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1145-1145
Author(s):  
Justin E Karr ◽  
Michael W Williams ◽  
Grant L Iverson ◽  
Sheng-Jean Huang ◽  
Chi-Cheng Yang

Abstract Objective Patients who experience a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) may have a headache condition preceding injury, develop a post-traumatic headache after injury, or experience headache neither before nor after injury. This study examined whether MTBI patients with no headache, pre-existing headache, and post-traumatic headache differed in acute-to-subacute outcomes. Method Patients with MTBI were recruited from an outpatient neurosurgery clinic in Taipei, Taiwan after emergency department referral (N = 291; 40.2% men; M = 37.9 ± 13.9 years-old; Mdn = 7 days-since-injury, range = 0–21), completing neuropsychological tests of attention, memory, and verbal fluency and questionnaires evaluating depression, anxiety, and post-concussion symptoms. Participants with no headache (reported neither pre- or post-injury), pre-existing headache (reported pre-injury headache, of whom some reported worsened post-injury headache), and post-traumatic headache (denied pre-injury headache, reported post-injury headache) were compared using non-parametric ANCOVA, controlling for gender and days-since-injury. Results Neuropsychological test performances did not differ between headache groups. Participants with pre-injury headache and post-traumatic headache had greater change in self-reported physical (F = 25.52, p &lt; 0.011, η2 = 0.15) and cognitive symptoms (F = 3.74, p = 0.025, η2 = 0.03) than participants with no headache. Participants with pre-injury headache reported worse post-injury anxiety symptoms than participants with post-traumatic headache (F = 12.02, p &lt; 0.011, η2 = 0.08). Conclusion(s) Participants with pre-injury and post-traumatic headache did not differ in outcome within 21 days of injury but had worse self-reported physical and cognitive symptoms than participants with no headache. Most participants with pre-injury headache experienced worsened headache following MTBI (53.7%). Future research is needed to assess whether more specific headache subtypes are differentially associated with MTBI outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document