scholarly journals LONG-TERM CARE IV A REVIEW OF THE LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE PROGRAMS IN 15 PILOT CITIES IN CHINA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S801-S801
Author(s):  
Yan Lin ◽  
Edward A Miller ◽  
Marc A Cohen ◽  
Pamela Nadash ◽  
Peng Du

Abstract China is now making all the efforts to solve the problem of who pays the bill for the rapidly increasing long-term care services. Since 2016, 15 cities in China have begun their pilot programs in long-term care insurance. Each city designed its own program. Some cities finance their long-term care services from medical insurance funding solely. Others supplement it with individual and/or employer contributions. This study documents the nature and extent of implementation of long-term care insurance across the 15 pilot cities to draw lessons for subsequent implementation nationally. This study used qualitative methods, including document review and key informant interviews with long-term care insurance administrators, medical insurance administrators, service providers in different settings and families and individuals who use long-term care services. Results reveal considerable variation in the specific attributes of the long-term care insurance programs implemented across the 15 participating cities, with respect to such characteristics as the target population, policy coverage, and payment methods, etc. Results also shed light on the achievements and challenges in implementing the long-term care insurance program. This study’s examination of long-term care insurance adoption in 15 Chinese cities serves as an important base with which to inform future national long-term care insurance design and implementation. It suggests that successful adoption of long-term care insurance across China will require administering jurisdictions to anticipate and address policy bottlenecks and implementation barriers that might otherwise inhibit program impact and effectiveness in addressing the growing long-term care needs of China’s aging population.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rumi Seko ◽  
Shuji Hashimoto ◽  
Miyuki Kawado ◽  
Yoshitaka Murakami ◽  
Masayuki Hayashi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialan Wu ◽  
Siman Chen ◽  
Huangliang Wen ◽  
Yayan Yi ◽  
Xiaoyan Liao

Abstract Background Chinese government launched a pilot study on public long-term care insurance (LTCI) recently. Guangzhou is one of the fifteen pilot cities, officially started providing LTCI in August 2017. An in-depth analysis of experimental data from the pilot city may provide suggestions for developing a fair and effective LTCI system. This study aimed to evaluate the LTCI pilot by exploring the characteristics and care needs of claimants, and performance of the assessment tool. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study in which claims data between July 2018 and March 2019 in the Guangzhou pilot was analyzed. LTCI claimants during the study period were included. The care needs were determined based on claimants’ physical function assessed by the Barthel Index and their medical conditions. Rasch analysis was used to explore the performance of the Barthel Index. Results Among 4810 claimants included, 4582 (95.3%) obtained LTCI benefits. Of these beneficiaries, 4357 (95.1%) were ≧ 60 years old, and 791 (17.3%) had dementia. Among 228 (4.7%) unsuccessful claimants, 22 (0.5%) had dementia. The prevalence of stroke was high in beneficiaries with (38.1%) or without dementia (56.6%), as well as in unsuccessful claimants with (40.9%) or without dementia (52.4%). Beneficiaries without dementia needed more support for basic activities of daily living and nursing care than those with dementia, while beneficiaries with dementia were more likely to be institutionalized. Five (22.7%) unsuccessful claimants with dementia and 48 (23.3%) unsuccessful claimants without dementia were disabled in at least two basic self-care activities. Regarding Barthel Index, Rasch analysis showed threshold disordering in “mobility” and “climbing stairs”, and the narrow interval was observed between all the adjacent categories of the ten items (< 1.4 logits). Conclusions Stroke and dementia were two common reasons for needing long-term care in LTCI claimants. The Barthel Index is not suitable for assessing and dividing LTCI claimants, because of inappropriate items and narrow category responses. A comprehensive assessment and grading system is required, together with needs-led care services. The eligibility should be expanded gradually based on balance finance solutions.


Author(s):  
Sunhee Park ◽  
Heejung Kim ◽  
Chang Gi Park

Abstract Background South Korea established universal long-term care insurance (LTCI) in 2008. However, actual requests for LTCI remain lower than government estimates because some eligible candidates never apply despite their strong care needs. This study aimed to examine factors affecting LTCI applications for older, community-dwelling Koreans. Methods Both individual- and community-level data were obtained from a national dataset from the Korea Health Panel Survey and the Korea National Statistical Office (N = 523). Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Results Only 16.4% of older adults in need of care applied for LTCI. Those who applied were more likely to be older, report poor self-rated health, receive care from non-family caregivers, and have caregivers experiencing high levels of caregiving burden. Regional differences in LTCI applications existed concerning the financial condition of one’s community. Conclusions Our study findings emphasize that Korean LTCI should implement both individual and community strategies to better assist older adults in properly acquiring LTCI. The government should make comprehensive efforts to increase access to LTCI in terms of availability, quality, cost, and information by collaborating with local centers.


2020 ◽  
pp. 073346482094306
Author(s):  
Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld ◽  
Anne Seltzer ◽  
Ana Ramirez ◽  
Ruqayyah Muhammad ◽  
Lee A. Lindquist

Many older adults wish to age-in-place but do not have long-term care plans for when they may require more assistance. PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL) is an evidence-based tool that helps older adults understand and plan for their long-term care needs. We examined the long-term effects of PYL use on user perceptions and planning of long-term care services. Individuals who previously accessed PYL were invited to complete an online, nation-wide mixed methodology survey about end-user outcomes related to PYL. Among 115 completed surveys, users found PYL helpful with long-term planning for their future needs. Over half of website users reported having conversations with others because of PYL use. However, 40% of respondents reported not having a conversation with others about their plans; common themes for barriers to planning included procrastination and a lack of immediate support needs. Although PYL helps with planning, many people are still not communicating their long-term care plans.


2004 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Hirakawa ◽  
Yuichiro Masuda ◽  
Kazumasa Uemura ◽  
Masafumi Kuzuya ◽  
Akihisa Iguchi

Author(s):  
Marcus J. Hollander ◽  
Neena L. Chappell

ABSTRACTThis paper reports on the results of analyses using administrative data from British Columbia for 10 years from fiscal 1987/1988 to 1996/1997, inclusive, to examine the comparative costs to government of long-term home care and residential care services. The analyses used administrative data for hospital care, physician care, drugs, and home care and residential long-term care. Direct comparisons for cost and utilization data were possible, as the same care-level classification system is used in BC for home care and residential care clients. Given significant changes in the type and/or level of care of clients over time, a full-time equivalent client strategy was used to maximize the accuracy of comparisons. The findings suggest that, in general, home care can be a lower-cost alternative to residential care for clients with similar care needs. The difference in costs between home care and residential care services narrows considerably for those who change their type and/or level of care, and home care was found to be more costly than long-term institutional care for home care clients who died. The findings from this study indicate that with the appropriate substitution for residential care services, in a planned and targeted manner, home care services can be a lower-cost alternative to residential long-term care in integrated systems of care delivery that include both sets of services.


1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard A. Palley ◽  
Julianne S. Oktay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document