8. Jurisdiction

Family Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Roiya Hodgson
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Law ◽  
Habitual Residence

This chapter deals with the European law governing jurisdiction in divorce and the international law concepts that are a feature of this area of law. It discusses the increasingly important question of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings, and explains the concepts of ‘domicile’which includes domicile of origin, domicile of dependence, and domicile of choice. It also explains the concept of ‘habitual residence’ as how both domicile and habitual residence apply to divorce proceedings. There is finally an outline of jurisdiction in practice and the rule that if the domicile of a client is uncertain then habitual residence is usually easier to establish. There is some mention of Brexit.

8. Jurisdiction

2019 ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Jane Sendall ◽  
Roiya Hodgson
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Law ◽  
Habitual Residence

This chapter deals with the European law governing jurisdiction in divorce and the international law concepts that are a feature of this area of law. It discusses the increasingly important question of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings, and explains the concepts of ‘domicile’which includes domicile of origin, domicile of dependence, and domicile of choice. It also explains the concept of ‘habitual residence’ as how both domicile and habitual residence apply to divorce proceedings. There is finally an outline of jurisdiction in practice and the rule that if the domicile of a client is uncertain then habitual residence is usually easier to establish. There is some mention of Brexit.

scholarly journals Residência Habitual e Lei Aplicável à Sucessão Causa Mortis Internacional

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso-Luis Calvo Caravaca
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
European Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Rio Grande Do Sul ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Para Determinar ◽  
Carlos Iii

RESIDÊNCIA HABITUAL E LEI APLICÁVEL À SUCESSÃO CAUSA MORTIS INTERNACIONAL*  HABITUAL RESIDENCE AND APPLICABLE LAW TO INTERNATIONAL CAUSA MORTIS SUCCESSION  Alfonso-Luis Calvo Caravaca**   RESUMO: O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o conteúdo do Regulamento (UE) 650/2012 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho em relação à determinação da lei aplicável. A norma traz em seu texto um critério objetivo para determinar a lei aplicável aos casos concretos: a residência habitual do falecido ao tempo do óbito. Este fator de conexão é analisado, bem como a cláusula de exceção a sua aplicação. Os conceitos de residência habitual e da cláusula de exceção, as vantagens e os inconvenientes da aplicação do Regulamento (UE) 650/2012 e alguns casos concretos relativos a sucessões internacionais são apresentados. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Lei aplicável. Direito Europeu. Direito Internacional Privado Europeu. Residência Habitual. Jurisdição Internacional. Sucessões. ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is to analyse the content of the European Union Succession Regulation (EU) 650/2012 concerning the determination of the applicable law. The Regulation contains objective standards to determine the applicable law in concrete cases: the habitual residence of a person at the time of its death. This connecting factor is analysed, as well as the exception clause and its application. The concepts of habitual residence and the exception clause, the advantages and the inconveniences of the application of the Regulation (EU) 650/2012 and some concrete cases related to cross borders successions were examined. KEYWORDS: Applicable Law. European Law. European Private International Law. Habitual Residence. International Jurisdiction. Succession. SUMÁRIO: Introdução. 1 Determinação da Lei Aplicável: o Critério Objetivo. 1.1 A Residência Habitual do Falecido ao Tempo do Óbito. 1.1.1 Conceito de “Residência Habitual”. 1.1.2 Grupos de Casos. 1.1.3 Vantagens e Inconvenientes da nova Regulamentação. 1.2 A Cláusula de Exceção. 1.2.1 Conceito e Crítica. 1.2.2 Pressupostos e Consequências Jurídicas. Referências.* Tradução de Silvio Brambila Fragoso Junior, mestrando do Program de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.** Catedrático de Direito Internacional Privado da Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Espanha. Doutor em Direito pela Università di Bologna, Itália. 

8. Jurisdiction

2018 ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Jane Sendall
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Law ◽  
Habitual Residence

This chapter deals with the European law governing jurisdiction in divorce and the international law concepts that are a feature of this area of law. It discusses the increasingly important question of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings, and explains the concepts of ‘domicile’ and ‘habitual residence’ as they apply to divorce proceedings.

8. Jurisdiction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Sendall
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
European Law ◽  
Habitual Residence

This chapter deals with the European law governing jurisdiction in divorce and the international law concepts that are a feature of this area of law. It discusses the increasingly important question of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings, and explains the concepts of ‘domicile’ and ‘habitual residence’ as they apply to divorce proceedings.

Ökologische Aspekte im öffentlich-rechtlichen Beschaffungswesen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Steengrafe
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
German Law ◽  
Government Procurement ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
European Law ◽  
Environmental Criteria ◽  
The Government ◽  
Model Law ◽  
The Government Procurement

The awarding of public contracts is of considerable economic importance and for this reason can be used to promote environmental concerns. The present work examines whether environmental criteria may be taken into account in the context of public procurement. To answer this question, the Government Procurement Agreement and the UNICTRAL Model Law on Public Procurement are considered at the level of international law. In European law, the primary as well as the relevant secondary law requirements and, in German law, the Cartel and Budget Procurement Law are assessed. This analysis also includes the interactions between the three levels.

EUNAVFOR OPERATION ATALANTA OFF SOMALIA: THE EU IN UNCHARTERED LEGAL WATERS?

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efthymios Papastavridis
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Careful Analysis ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
European Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Extensive Discussion ◽  
Operation Atalanta ◽  
Somali Coast ◽  
The Eu

AbstractEUNAVFOR Operation Atalanta has been the first maritime operation of the European Union and it has certainly been successful given the significant decrease of pirate attacks off the Somali coast. However, various issues have been raised concerning its legal basis under international law and its legal framework, including questions of responsibility. These issues are particularly interesting since the EU has a more integrated legal order than other organizations involved in such operations (eg UN, NATO). The present article attempts to address these issues against the background of international and European law. Even though the legal basis of the Operation is clear from a European law perspective, there have been certain misconceptions concerning the legal basis of the Operation under international law. The delineation of the Operation's legal framework requires a careful analysis of the rules applicable to each of its phases and of its addressees, since each phase is subject to different rules which are binding on different actors. Finally, there is an extensive discussion of questions of responsibility, which were heavily influenced by the applicable Rules of Engagement and of the actual conduct of the Operation. The conclusion is that, at least on the high seas, responsibility should primarily rest with the flag States rather than with the EU. However, in most cases the EU is indirectly responsible for violations of international law, except in cases where suspected pirates are transferred to third States pursuant to EU agreements with such States, in which case it bears primarily responsibility.

Part V Family Law, 28 Mental Incapacity

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torremans Paul
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
Mentally Disordered ◽  
Mental Capacity Act 2005 ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Mental Capacity Act

This chapter examines mental incapacity as a special issue in private international law. Problems arise in cases where, for example, a mentally incapacitated person may be present in one country but habitually resident in another when measures of protection are needed; or this person may own property situated in a country different from his present location or habitual residence that needs to be dealt with. This chapter considers the jurisdiction of the English courts to order protective measures over a mentally disordered or incapacitated person or over his property, as well as the choice of law rules governing the protection of mentally incapacitated persons, prior to and under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. It also discusses the recognition and enforcement of protective measures taken abroad, along with cases outside the realm of the Mental Capacity Act.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document