scholarly journals Residência Habitual e Lei Aplicável à Sucessão Causa Mortis Internacional

Author(s):  
Alfonso-Luis Calvo Caravaca

RESIDÊNCIA HABITUAL E LEI APLICÁVEL À SUCESSÃO CAUSA MORTIS INTERNACIONAL*  HABITUAL RESIDENCE AND APPLICABLE LAW TO INTERNATIONAL CAUSA MORTIS SUCCESSION  Alfonso-Luis Calvo Caravaca**   RESUMO: O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o conteúdo do Regulamento (UE) 650/2012 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho em relação à determinação da lei aplicável. A norma traz em seu texto um critério objetivo para determinar a lei aplicável aos casos concretos: a residência habitual do falecido ao tempo do óbito. Este fator de conexão é analisado, bem como a cláusula de exceção a sua aplicação. Os conceitos de residência habitual e da cláusula de exceção, as vantagens e os inconvenientes da aplicação do Regulamento (UE) 650/2012 e alguns casos concretos relativos a sucessões internacionais são apresentados. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Lei aplicável. Direito Europeu. Direito Internacional Privado Europeu. Residência Habitual. Jurisdição Internacional. Sucessões. ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is to analyse the content of the European Union Succession Regulation (EU) 650/2012 concerning the determination of the applicable law. The Regulation contains objective standards to determine the applicable law in concrete cases: the habitual residence of a person at the time of its death. This connecting factor is analysed, as well as the exception clause and its application. The concepts of habitual residence and the exception clause, the advantages and the inconveniences of the application of the Regulation (EU) 650/2012 and some concrete cases related to cross borders successions were examined. KEYWORDS: Applicable Law. European Law. European Private International Law. Habitual Residence. International Jurisdiction. Succession. SUMÁRIO: Introdução. 1 Determinação da Lei Aplicável: o Critério Objetivo. 1.1 A Residência Habitual do Falecido ao Tempo do Óbito. 1.1.1 Conceito de “Residência Habitual”. 1.1.2 Grupos de Casos. 1.1.3 Vantagens e Inconvenientes da nova Regulamentação. 1.2 A Cláusula de Exceção. 1.2.1 Conceito e Crítica. 1.2.2 Pressupostos e Consequências Jurídicas. Referências.* Tradução de Silvio Brambila Fragoso Junior, mestrando do Program de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.** Catedrático de Direito Internacional Privado da Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Espanha. Doutor em Direito pela Università di Bologna, Itália. 

Author(s):  
Marek Świerczyński

Disputes arising from international data breaches can be complex. Despite the introduction of new, unified EU regulation on the protection of personal data (GDPR), the European Union failed to amend the Rome II Regulation on the applicable law to non-contractual liability and to extend its scope to the infringements of privacy. GDPR only contains provisions on international civil procedure. However, there are no supplementing conflict-of-law rules. In order to determine the applicable law national courts have to apply divergent and dispersed national codifications of private international law. The aim of this study is to propose an optimal conflict-of-law model for determining the applicable law in case of infringement of the GDPR’s privacy regime.


Author(s):  
Monika Pauknerová

Private international law smoothes the edges of civilian law and common law thanks to its specific legislative and technical structure. Conflict-of-law rules are considered to be neutral, and therefore more appropriate for unification, than substantive rules because countries are prepared to surrender their own individual solutions for the sake of uniform international or supranational regulation. This is evident in the successful unification of conflict-of-law rules at the global and European Union levels, as compared with the less common partial unifications of substantive rules. The paper illustrates several examples of unilateral legal acts in the European space, how diverse may be their substantive qualification in different legal systems, and what impacts these substantive differences may have upon the determination of the applicable law for obligations under European conflict-of-law rules. From the perspective of the conflict of laws, an issue remains open regarding what approach should be taken where a uniform legislative instrument – namely a European Regulation – fails to include a particular institution or act either expressly or impliedly.


Author(s):  
Elena Júdová

The European Regulation no 650/2012 unified the determination of jurisdiction and applicable law in succession matters in the Member States of the European Union. At the same time, it underlined other issues that complicate decision making on cross-border succession in the Slovak Republic. One of the most striking is the resolution of the issue of settling the common property of spouses, which under Slovak procedural law, is exercised by a notary in succession proceedings. The Slovak Republic does not participate at the enhanced cooperation on cross-border matrimonial property regimes, so joining jurisdiction in these cases with succession proceedings is very complicated. The present article deals with this and some other issues which the fragmentation of EU private international law brings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
María Asunción Cebrián Salvat

Resumen: El nuevo Reglamento 1104/2016 se ocupa de la competencia judicial internacional, la Ley aplicable y el reconocimiento de decisiones relativas a los efectos patrimoniales de las uniones de hecho registradas. ¿Pero qué ocurre con los efectos patrimoniales de las uniones de hecho no registradas? Estas comunidades de vida, cada vez más comunes en España, conllevan también consecuencias económicas. Cuando se acaba el amor empiezan los litigios. Los integrantes de la pareja pueden reclamar alimentos debidos, pensión por desequilibrio, adjudicación de la vivienda y del ajuar familiar o posibles derechos sucesorios. En este trabajo se analizará la competencia judicial internacional y la Ley aplicable al patrimonio de las parejas de hecho no registradas en Derecho internacional privado español.Palabras clave: Normas de producción interna, competencia judicial internacional, ley aplicable, parejas de hecho, parejas no casadas, uniones de hecho.Abstract: New Regulation 1104/2016 deals with the assessment of international jurisdiction, applicable law and extraterritorial validity of decisions relating to the patrimonial effects of registered partnerships. The patrimonial effects of unregistered couples remain subject to domestic rules. These unions are more and more common in Spain and they also entail economic consequences. When love ends, litigation starts. The former partners can proceed against each other claiming for maintenance, compensatory allowances, rights of use and occupancy of the house or household effects and potential inheritance rights. This paper addresses the determination of international jurisdiction and applicable law on these matters under Spanish private international law.Keywords: Domestic rules, international jurisdiction, applicable law, civil partnerships, unmarried couples, de facto unions.


Obiter ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Garth Bouwers

The influence of European Union law on the United Kingdom is noteworthy. In the commercial arena, it has transformed the rules of private international law in the United Kingdom. The European Union has established a common framework for jurisdiction of national courts, the recognition and enforcement of judgments and the determination of the applicable law. The article highlights the implications of Brexit on the determination of the applicable law in the United Kingdom, more specifically, its impact on a tacit choice of law in international commercial contracts. The article examines the current legal position in the United Kingdom (i.e. the legal framework in a so-called “soft-Brexit” scenario). Secondly, the article analyses the effect of a complete withdrawal from the European Union (i.e. the legal framework in a “hard- Brexit” scenario).


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Esperanza Castellanos Ruiz

Resumen: El Reglamento 650/2012 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 4 de julio de 2012, relativo a la competencia, la ley aplicable, el reconocimiento y la ejecución de las resoluciones, a la aceptación y la ejecución de los documentos públicos en materia de sucesiones mortis causa y a la creación de un certificado sucesorio europeo ha venido a unificar las soluciones tan dispares de Derecho internacional privado que existían en el ámbito de la Unión Europea en materia sucesoria. Reconociendo el esfuerzo de los Estados miembros por coordinar la unificación de las normas de Derecho internacional privado en este área, su aplicación no está exenta de problemas con otras materias que afectan directamente a la regulación de la sucesión de una persona, como sucede, por ejemplo, con la regulación de los derechos reales que pueden afectar a los bienes de la masa hereditaria. Partiendo de que no existe una unificación de las normas de Derecho internacional privado en materia de transmisión de la propiedad de los bienes y de los derechos reales, en general, reconocidos por los distintos Estados miembros se pueden plantear muchos problemas teniendo en cuenta la existencia de un numerus clausus de derechos reales y los distintos sistemas de inscripción registral contemplados para la adquisición de tales derechos reales. Los artículos 1 y 23 del Reglamento sucesorio intentan solucionar este conflicto. Representan las dos caras de una misma moneda pues regulan el ámbito de aplicación de la lex successionis en sentido negativo y en sentido positivo, respectivamente. Por un lado, el artículo 1 recoge las cuestiones excluidas del ámbito de aplicación del Reglamento y, por otro lado, el artículo 23 recoge las cuestiones incluidas en su ámbito de aplicación. Sin embargo, la colisión se plantea en relación con la aplicación de la lex rei sitae a determinadas cuestiones sucesorias que están incluidas en el ámbito de aplicación de la lex succesionis a las que hay que aplicar cumulativamente la dos Leyes. Así, la Ley sucesoria regula la transmisión a los herederos, y en su caso, a los legatarios, de los bienes que integran la herencia, según recoge la letra e) del artículo 23.2, y las letras k) y l) del artículo 1.2, excluyen de la aplicación de la ley sucesoria la naturaleza de los derechos reales y cualquier inscripción de derechos sobre bienes muebles o inmuebles en un registro; cuestiones que, en la mayoría de los casos, quedan sometidas a la lex rei sitae o lex registrationis. Este conflicto de leyes es lo que ha provocado la primera decisión del TJUE sobre el Reglamento sucesorio: Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, Sala Segunda, de 12 de octubre de 2017: Kubicka.Palabras clave: Sucesión internacional, lex successionis, lex rei sitae, lex registrationis, ámbito de la ley aplicable, derechos reales, derechos de propiedad, legatum per vindicationem y per damnationem.Abstract: Regulation (EU) no. 650/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 July2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession is one of the most important results hitherto achieved for codifying private international law which the European Union. Recognizing the effort of the Member States to coordinate the unification of the rules of private international law in this area, its application is not exempt from problems with other areas that directly affect the regulation of the succession of a person, as happens for example with the regulation of property law that may affect the inheritance assets. Recognition of foreign property law may create problems in light of a Member State’s numerus clausus of property rights and differing land registration regimes. The study of the matters governed by the lex successionis, listed in article 23.2 ESR, must be done taking into account article 1.2 ESR, setting out the issues which are excluyed from the lex successionis scope. Often the exclusion or inclusion of particular matters from or within the scope of application of the lex successionis are two sides of the same coin. In other words, article 1.2 ESR governs the scope of application in a negative sense and article 23.2 ESR in a positive sense. However, the collision arises in relation to the application of the lex rei sitae to certain inheritance questions that are included in the scope of application of lex successionis to which the two Acts must be applied cumulatively. This is what happens with the regulation by lex successionis of the transfer to the heirs and, as the case may be, to the legatees of the assets, rights and obligations forming part of the estate, including the conditions and effects of the acceptance or waiver of the succession or of a legacy, according to letter e) of art. 23.2, bearing in mind that the letters k) and l) of art. 1.2, exclude from the application of the succession law the nature of rights in rem; and any recording in a register of rights in immovable or movable property, including the legal requirements for such recording, and the effects of recording or failing to record such rights in a register; issues that, in most cases, are subject to the lex rei sitae or lex registrationis. This conflict of laws is what led to the first decision of the CJEU on the Succession Regulation: Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Second Chamber, of October 12, 2017: Kubicka.Keywords: International succession, lex successionis, lex rei sitae, lex registrationis, the scope of the aplicable law, rights in rem, property rights, legatum per vindicationem y per damnationem 


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 43-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Żarnowiec

Since August 17, 2015 the courts of the Member States of the European Union apply the conflict-of-laws rules adopted in the EU Succession Regulation (EU) in succession matters. From the Polish point of view, this constitutes not only the change of the rules applied for the purposes of determining jurisdiction and the applicable law, but also a new approach to the overriding mandatory provisions. Contrary to other European instruments of private international law, the Succession Regulation neither uses the term “overriding mandatory provisions”, nor defines its meaning. Nevertheless, in Article 30 the Regulation provides for application — irrespective of the law applicable to the succession under its conflict rules — of the special rules of the State, where certain immovable property, enterprises or other special categories of assets are located, and which — for economic, family or social considerations — impose restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets, in so far as, under the law of that State, they are applicable irrespective of the law applicable to the succession. The interpretation of this provision cause difficulties. It is not clear whether the concept of the special provisions embodied in Article 30 refers to the concept of overriding mandatory rules, well known in the European private international law, or whether it constitutes an original solution. Another controversial issue discussed in the paper is the relevance of the mandatory rules of the forum or the third State other than those mentioned in Article 30.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document