scholarly journals Heart health promotion: a community development experiment in a rural area of Quebec, Canada

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Pelletier
2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. MacLean ◽  
Jane Farquharson ◽  
Stephanie Heath ◽  
Kari Barkhouse ◽  
Celeste Latter ◽  
...  

Purpose. To present the outcomes of a capacity-building initiative for heart health promotion. Design. Follow-up study combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Setting. The Western Health Region of Nova Scotia, Canada. Subjects. Twenty organizations, including provincial and municipal agencies and community groups engaged in health, education, and recreation activities. Intervention. Two strategies were used for this study: partnership development and organizational development. Partnership development included the creation of multilevel partnerships in diverse sectors. Organizational development included the provision of technical support, action research, community activation, and organizational consultation. Measures. Quantitative data included number and type of partnerships, learning opportunities, community activation initiatives, and organizational changes. Qualitative data included information on the effectiveness of partnerships, organizational consultation, and organizational changes. Results. Results included the development of 204 intersectoral partnerships, creation of a health promotion clearinghouse, 47 workshops attended by approximately 1400 participants, diverse research products, implementation of 18 community heart health promotion initiatives, and increased organizational capacity for heart health promotion via varied organizational changes, including policy changes, fund reallocations, and enhanced knowledge and practices. Conclusions. Partnership and organizational development were effective mechanisms for building capacity in heart health promotion. This intervention may have implications for large-scale, community-based, chronic-disease prevention projects.


2007 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Jinadu ◽  
C.A. Adegbenro ◽  
A.O. Esmai ◽  
A.A. Ojo ◽  
B.A. Oyeleye

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 200-206
Author(s):  
Malakai Ofanoa ◽  
Samuela Ofanoa ◽  
Stephen Buetow

For Pacific peoples, health promotion, community nursing and community development initiative over many years, has often been conducted within a framework of one-sided decision-making. There is always an imbalance between the power relationships of the community being studied and those of the researchers or health practitioners. As a result, there is lack of understanding on the part of the researchers and the health funding agencies of the need to negotiate processes with members of the community being studied or engaging with. All of this are within an overarching lack of understanding of, and respect for, Pacific cultural values, frameworks and Pacific ways of doing things. This paper seeks to explore an alternative concept whereby these values are acknowledged. This concept is metaphorically called “alea ke pau” (or, negotiated evaluation). This approach is forward-looking and one that respects a ‘bottom-up’ view rather than the traditional ‘top-down’ view of health work and funding agencies. However, using two Pacific research methodologies called Talanga and Kakala, to explore the concept of alea ke pau were held with five men’s focus groups operating within Kava Clubs in Auckland, New Zealand, and five focus groups in Tonga. The results from these discussions are presented demonstrating the development and application of the “alea ke pau” or “negotiated evaluation” approach. 


Author(s):  
Louise Warwick-Booth ◽  
Sally Foster

Abstract This book chapter seeks to: (i) explore 'the community' as a vital context for health promotion; (ii) explore different meanings of community participation, engagement, community involvement and community development; (iii) discuss the importance of social capital; (iv) explore the role of lay involvement in health promotion; and (v) suggest that working with communities and not merely in communities is essential for resilience and wellbeing.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 406-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Martin Taylor ◽  
Susan Elliott ◽  
Kerry Robinson ◽  
Stuart Taylor

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph H. Dressendorfer ◽  
Kim Raine ◽  
Ronald J. Dyck ◽  
Ronald C. Plotnikoff ◽  
Ruth L. Collins-Nakai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document