scholarly journals P-240. HMG versus oral progesterone supplementation in the treatment of early repeated pregnancy loss due to luteal phase insufficiency

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
H.N. Sallam ◽  
A.N. Sallam ◽  
F. Ezzeldin ◽  
A.A. Abou-Ali ◽  
A. Khanfour
2020 ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
E. S. Polushkina ◽  
R. G. Shmakov

Habitual miscarriage is a fairly common complication of early pregnancy. In the opinion of most authors, the term habitual miscarriage is used to describe a loss of two or more pregnancies during the first 22 weeks of pregnancy. Issues of terminology and management continue to be relevant and debatable in medical professional communities and need further discussion. In addition to the medical sides of the issue, habitual miscarriage has a significant psychological impact on women and their partners. Regardless of the gestational age, the loss of pregnancy for most couples is similar in importance to the loss of a newborn and is associated with the loss of hope and plans that future parents connected with a baby who has not yet been born. After repeated losses, bereavement and emotional upheaval are further exacerbated irrespective of the term of abortion. Repeated pregnancy loss is a significant negative event in the life of a couple both from a medical and psychological point of view, that’s why the provision of adequate medical care is one of the objectives of a specialist managing pregnancy. This also involves the choice of effective disease management. Previously it was shown that luteal phase deficiency might be the cause of this phenomenon, and that hormonal deficiency had to be replenished. Many modern publications confirm that progesterone and its derivatives have an important immunomodulatory role in the habitual miscarriage. The article describes the role of progesterone in maintaining pregnancy and the results of studies devoted to the role of dydrogesterone. It also presents data of international studies on the treatment of women with habitual miscarriage.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Virili ◽  
Miriam Cellini ◽  
Maria Giulia Santaguida ◽  
Nunzia Brusca ◽  
Ilaria Stramazzo ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Andrews ◽  
D. F. Roberts

SummaryCytogenetic investigations were undertaken on 120 couples in Newcastle with repeated pregnancy loss for which no anatomical or other obvious reason could be established. The level of major chromosome anomalies was high, with 6·7% of couples showing one member with an abnormal karyotype. One major anomaly occurred in a control series of 240 random newborns. The couples also showed an elevated incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms. Similar studies in the literature are reviewed. It seems that major chromosome anomalies make an appreciable contribution to repeated reproductive loss, but proof of the involvement of minor chromosome variants though suspected is less clear.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 641-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Seyedhassani ◽  
Massoud Houshmand ◽  
Seyed Mehdi Kalantar ◽  
Glayol Modabber ◽  
Abbas Aflatoonian

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Jukic ◽  
Antonia M. Calafat ◽  
D. Robert McConnaughey ◽  
Matthew P. Longnecker ◽  
Jane A. Hoppin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. S300
Author(s):  
D.A. Forstein ◽  
H. McGrath ◽  
L. Street ◽  
P.B. Miller ◽  
C.E. Likes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document