In vitro activity of olorofim against clinical isolates of Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans using EUCAST and CLSI methodologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 3582-3585
Author(s):  
Olga Rivero-Menendez ◽  
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the in vitro activity of olorofim, a new broad-spectrum antifungal with a novel mechanism of action, against a collection of 123 Spanish clinical isolates belonging to five Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans. Methods The activity of olorofim against Scedosporium apiospermum (n = 30), Scedosporium boydii (n = 30), Scedosporium ellipsoideum (n = 10), Scedosporium aurantiacum (n = 20), Scedosporium dehoogii (n = 3) and Lomentospora prolificans (n = 30) was compared with that of amphotericin B, voriconazole, isavuconazole and micafungin by performing EUCAST and CLSI reference methods for antifungal susceptibility testing. Results Amphotericin B and isavuconazole showed MICs ≥2 mg/L for all the species evaluated and voriconazole was moderately active (GM, MIC50 and MIC90 values ≤2 mg/L) against all of them except L. prolificans. Micafungin was effective against S. apiospermum complex strains, but exhibited elevated MECs for S. dehoogii and S. aurantiacum. Olorofim showed low MICs for all the Scedosporium strains tested (GM values were lower than 0.130 and 0.339 by the EUCAST method and the CLSI method, respectively, for all of the species), including those belonging to the MDR species L. prolificans, for which GM values were 0.115 and 0.225 mg/L by the EUCAST method and the CLSI method, respectively, while the GMs for the rest of the antifungals evaluated were higher than 3.732 mg/L using both methodologies. Conclusions Olorofim displayed promising in vitro activity against the Scedosporium and L. prolificans strains tested, some of which have reduced susceptibility to the antifungals that are currently in use.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S656-S656
Author(s):  
Hamid Badali ◽  
Hoja Patterson ◽  
Carmita Sanders ◽  
Barbara Mermella ◽  
Connie Gibas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Invasive fusariosis is associated with marked morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts, and treatment options are limited. Common etiologic agents include members of the F. oxysporum and F. solani species complexes (FOSC and FSSC, respectively). Manogepix (MGX), the active moiety of fosmanogepix, is a novel GWT1 inhibitor with broad antifungal activity. Fosmanogepix has previously shown in vivo efficacy in an immunocompromised murine model of invasive fusariosis. Our objective was to evaluate the in vitro activity of MGX against FOSC and FSSC isolates. Methods Clinical isolates of FOSC (n=49) and FSSC (19) were identified by combined phenotypic characteristics and DNA sequence analysis of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1α) and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2). Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI M38 broth microdilution. Minimum effective concentrations (MEC) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were read after 48 hours of incubation at 50% and 100% inhibition of growth for MGX, and MIC values were read for amphotericin B, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and voriconazole at 100% inhibition of growth. Results MGX demonstrated potent in vitro activity against both FOSC and FSSC isolates. Against the 49 FOSC isolates, the MGX MECs ranged from <0.015-0.03 mg/mL, and MICs at the 50% inhibition of growth endpoint ranged from <0.015-0.12 mg/mL (Table). MIC values were higher when read at 100% inhibition of growth. Similar results were observed against FSSC isolates (MEC and MIC ranges <0.015 and <0.015-0.25 mg/mL, respectively). MGX MEC and MIC 50% inhibition values were in close agreement for both FOSC and FSSC isolates. Of the other antifungals tested, amphotericin B demonstrated in vitro good activity (MIC ranges 1-4 and 0.25-4 mg/mL against FOSC and FSSC, respectively). In contrast, the azoles demonstrated reduced susceptibility (MIC range 1- >16 mg/mL). MIC/MEC values (mcg/mL) for manogepix and other antifungals against FOSC and FSSC isolates Conclusion MGX demonstrated in vitro activity against FOSC and FSSC clinical isolates. Both changes in fungal morphology (MEC) and reductions in growth (MIC 50% inhibition) were observed. Clinical studies are ongoing to determine the efficacy of fosmanogepix in patients with invasive fungal infections. Disclosures Ashraf S. Ibrahim, PhD, Astellas Pharma (Research Grant or Support) Karen J. Shaw, PhD, Amplyx (Consultant)Forge Therapeutics (Consultant) Nathan P. Wiederhold, PharmD, Astellas (Grant/Research Support)BioMerieux (Grant/Research Support)Cepheid (Grant/Research Support)Covance (Grant/Research Support)F2G (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Speaker’s Bureau)Mayne Pharma (Advisor or Review Panel member)Sfunga (Grant/Research Support)


1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela ◽  
E. Mellado ◽  
J. V. Martinez-Suarez ◽  
A. Monzon

2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2587-2590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos G. Almyroudis ◽  
Deanna A. Sutton ◽  
Annette W. Fothergill ◽  
Michael G. Rinaldi ◽  
Shimon Kusne

ABSTRACT We evaluated the in vitro susceptibilities of 217 zygomycetes to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, and flucytosine. The significant in vitro activity of posaconazole against several species appears to support its reported clinical efficacy. Decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B was noted with Cunninghamella bertholletiae.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 232
Author(s):  
Olga Rivero-Menendez ◽  
Juan Carlos Soto-Debran ◽  
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo

Ibrexafungerp is a new orally-available 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis inhibitor in clinical development. Its in vitro activity and that of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and micafungin were evaluated against a collection of 168 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp., including azole–susceptible and azole–resistant (Cyp51A mutants) Aspergillus fumigatus sensu stricto (s.s.) and cryptic species of Aspergillus belonging to six species complexes showing different patterns of antifungal resistance, using EUCAST and CLSI antifungal susceptibility testing reference methods. Ibrexafungerp displayed low geometric means of minimal effective concentrations (MECs) against A. fumigatus s.s. strains, both azole susceptible (0.040 mg/L by EUCAST and CLSI versus 1.231 mg/L and 0.660 mg/L for voriconazole, respectively) and azole resistant (0.092 mg/L and 0.056 mg/L, EUCAST and CLSI, while those for voriconazole were 2.144 mg/L and 2.000 mg/L). Ibrexafungerp was active against most of the cryptic species of Aspergillus tested, yielding MEC values only comparable to those of micafungin. Nevertheless, this new compound exhibited a moderate activity against A. ustus complex species, MECs ≥ 0.5 mg/L against Aspergillus insuetus and Aspergillus keveii strains, and was inactive against the Aspergillus alliaceus isolates tested (MEC90s ≥ 16 mg/L). All in all, ibrexafungerp shows encouraging in vitro results against cryptic species of Aspergillus and azole–susceptible and azole resistant strains of A. fumigatus, some of which are difficult to treat using the available therapeutic options.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail V. Edelstein ◽  
Elena Yu. Skleenova ◽  
Ivan V. Trushin ◽  
Alexey Yu. Kuzmenkov ◽  
Alexey А. Martinovich ◽  
...  

Objective. To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in various regions of Russia based on results of local susceptibility testing by disk diffusion method. Materials and Methods. Overall, 160 laboratories located in 61 Russian cities participated in this surveillance during 2018-2020. All consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in each participating laboratory were included in the study. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing was done by disc-diffusion method in accordance with current EUCAST recommendations. Susceptibility data for carbapenems and III-IV generation cephalosporins, as well as results of carbapenemases detection, were also reported, if available. All the data were recorded in electronic case report form developed on the OpenClinica online platform (www.openclinica.com). Data analysis and reporting were done using AMRcloud online platform (https://amrcloud.net/). Results. In total, we received information on antimicrobial susceptibility of 22,121 isolates, including 17,456 (78.9%) Enterobacterales and 4,665 (21.1%) P. aeruginosa. Less than 9% of Enterobacterales isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. At the same time rates of resistance to ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem were 54.1%, 58.9%, 59.4%, 41.4%, 23.9%, and 21.3%. Among Enterobacterales the highest level of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was detected in K. pneumoniae (16.5%), lowest – in E. coli (2.1%). Some increase of resistance to ceftazidimeavibactam was noted during the study – from 7.8% in 2018-2019 to 9.6% in 2020 (p = 0.0001). Rate of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in P. aeruginosa was 33.1%. At the same time rates of resistance to ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem were 51.1%, 54.5%, 50%, and 47.3%. During the study there was statistically significant decrease in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in P. aeruginosa (p = 0.0001). Resistance rates for all beta-lactams for both Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were higher in nosocomial isolates than in community-acquired isolates. Conclusions. Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated significantly higher in vitro activity against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa Russian clinical isolates comparing with commonly used carbapenems and extended spectrum cephalosporins. Access for all study data available at the AMRcloud online platform (https://amrcloud.net/ru/project/cazavi-1-2/).


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S319-S320
Author(s):  
Chelsea E Jones ◽  
Ellen G Kline ◽  
Minh-Hong Nguyen ◽  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Ryan K Shields

Abstract Background Eravacycline (ERV) is a recently-approved, fully synthetic fluorocycline agent that demonstrates broad in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens. We sought to compare the activity of ERV with minocycline (MIN) and tigecycline (TGC) against diverse CRE clinical isolates, and to evaluate the performance of commercially-available susceptibility testing methods. Methods ERV, MIN, and TGC minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in triplicate by broth microdilution against previously characterized CRE isolates. ERV susceptibility was also measured by disk diffusion (20 µg disk; Mast Group) and MIC test strips (MTS; Liofilchem) according to manufacturer instructions. Results 148 CRE were tested, including 92 K. pneumoniae, 32 Enterobacter spp, 11 E. coli, 5 C. freundii, 4 K. oxytoca, and 4 S. marcescens. 72% of isolates harbored blaKPC, which encoded KPC-2 (n = 33), KPC-3 (n = 48), and other KPC variants (n = 22). 77% and 19% of isolates were resistant to meropenem and ceftazidime–avibactam, respectively. By BMD, the ERV, MIN, and TGC MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 for shown in the Table. ERV MICs were ≥2-fold lower than MIN and TGC against 99% and 43% of isolates, respectively. ERV MICs did not vary by species or KPC-subtype. ERV MICs determined by BMD and MTS were well-correlated showing 89% essential agreement (MIC within one 2-fold dilution; Figure). The rate of categorical agreement (CA) was 73%. By comparison, the CA rate between BMD and disk diffusion was 78%. By both MTS and disk diffusion methods, susceptibility results clustered on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. 50% of disk diffusion zones clustered between 14 and 16 millimeters (mm), which is 1 mm on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint (≥15 mm). Conclusion This study confirms the in vitro activity of ERV against CRE clinical isolates, which is comparable to TGC. ERV MTS demonstrated high rates of EA, but lower rates of CA. Clinicians should be aware of the nuances of ERV susceptibility testing and recognize that the modal distribution of ERV MICs against CRE lies on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Compain ◽  
Françoise Botterel ◽  
Emilie Sitterlé ◽  
André Paugam ◽  
Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1124-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
K L Oakley ◽  
C B Moore ◽  
D W Denning

In this study, we investigated the in vitro activity of SCH-56592 (SCH), a new triazole antifungal agent. We compared the activity of SCH with those of itraconazole (ITZ) and amphotericin B (AB) against 60 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. by using a microtiter format. Incubation was done at 37 degrees C for 48 h, and MIC endpoints (no growth) were read visually. The medium used for all of the drugs was RPMI 1640 buffered with morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) and supplemented with 2% glucose. MICs and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs; killing of > or = 99.99%) were measured for all isolates. The geometric mean (GM) MICs and ranges (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: SCH, 0.09 and < or = 0.01 to 1; ITZ, 0.25 and 0.06 to 32; AB, 1.46 and 0.25 to 32. Aspergillus terreus (n = 7) was markedly more susceptible to SCH (GM, 0.05 microg/ml) and ITZ (GM, 0.07 microg/ml) than to AB (GM, 8.8 microg/ml). For all isolates, the GM MFCs and ranges (in micrograms per milliliter) were as follows: SCH, 3.64 and 0.125 to 16; ITZ, 15.09 and 0.125 to 32; AB, 10.3 and 1 to 32. In the drug concentration range tested, 71, 32, and 64% of the isolates against which SCH, ITZ, and AB, respectively, were tested were killed. A reproducibility study was performed with 20% of the isolates; for 11 of the 12 isolates retested, the MIC was the same or within 1 well of the original MIC of each drug. Therefore, in vitro mould testing of SCH is feasible and reproducible. SCH was found to be very active against all species of Aspergillus and at lower concentrations than either ITZ or AB.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document