scholarly journals Genomic decision support needs in pediatric primary care

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 851-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W Pennington ◽  
Dean J Karavite ◽  
Edward M Krause ◽  
Jeffrey Miller ◽  
Barbara A Bernhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Pediatric Primary Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Further Development

Abstract Clinical genome and exome sequencing can diagnose pediatric patients with complex conditions that often require follow-up care with multiple specialties. The American Academy of Pediatrics emphasizes the role of the medical home and the primary care pediatrician in coordinating care for patients who need multidisciplinary support. In addition, the electronic health record (EHR) with embedded clinical decision support is recognized as an important component in providing care in this setting. We interviewed 6 clinicians to assess their experience caring for patients with complex and rare genetic findings and hear their opinions about how the EHR currently supports this role. Using these results, we designed a candidate EHR clinical decision support application mock-up and conducted formative exploratory user testing with 26 pediatric primary care providers to capture opinions on its utility in practice with respect to a specific clinical scenario. Our results indicate agreement that the functionality represented by the mock-up would effectively assist with care and warrants further development.

scholarly journals Clinical Decision Support for Worker Health: A Five-Site Qualitative Needs Assessment in Primary Care Settings

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 635-643
Author(s):  
Joan S. Ash ◽  
Dian Chase ◽  
Sherry Baron ◽  
Margaret S. Filios ◽  
Richard N. Shiffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Technical Feasibility ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Worker Health ◽  
Operational Issues

Abstract Background Although patients who work and have related health issues are usually first seen in primary care, providers in these settings do not routinely ask questions about work. Guidelines to help manage such patients are rarely used in primary care. Electronic health record (EHR) systems with worker health clinical decision support (CDS) tools have potential for assisting these practices. Objective This study aimed to identify the need for, and barriers and facilitators related to, implementation of CDS tools for the clinical management of working patients in a variety of primary care settings. Methods We used a qualitative design that included analysis of interview transcripts and observational field notes from 10 clinics in five organizations. Results We interviewed 83 providers, staff members, managers, informatics and information technology experts, and leaders and spent 35 hours observing. We identified eight themes in four categories related to CDS for worker health (operational issues, usefulness of proposed CDS, effort and time-related issues, and topic-specific issues). These categories were classified as facilitators or barriers to the use of the CDS tools. Facilitators related to operational issues include current technical feasibility and new work patterns associated with the coordinated care model. Facilitators concerning usefulness include users' need for awareness and evidence-based tools, appropriateness of the proposed CDS for their patients, and the benefits of population health data. Barriers that are effort-related include additional time this proposed CDS might take, and other pressing organizational priorities. Barriers that are topic-specific include sensitive issues related to health and work and the complexities of information about work. Conclusion We discovered several themes not previously described that can guide future CDS development: technical feasibility of the proposed CDS within commercial EHRs, the sensitive nature of some CDS content, and the need to assist the entire health care team in managing worker health.

scholarly journals Live Usability Testing of Two Complex Clinical Decision Support Tools: Observational Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safiya Richardson ◽  
David Feldstein ◽  
Thomas McGinn ◽  
Linda S Park ◽  
Sundas Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Usability Testing ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Chief Complaint ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Environment

BACKGROUND Potential of the electronic health records (EHR) and clinical decision support (CDS) systems to improve the practice of medicine has been tempered by poor design and the resulting burden they place on providers. CDS is rarely tested in the real clinical environment. As a result, many tools are hard to use, placing strain on providers and resulting in low adoption rates. The existing CDS usability literature relies primarily on expert opinion and provider feedback via survey. This is the first study to evaluate CDS usability and the provider-computer-patient interaction with complex CDS in the real clinical environment. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to further understand the barriers and facilitators of meaningful CDS usage within a real clinical context. METHODS This qualitative observational study was conducted with 3 primary care providers during 6 patient care sessions. In patients with the chief complaint of sore throat, a CDS tool built with the Centor Score was used to stratify the risk of group A Streptococcus pharyngitis. In patients with a chief complaint of cough or upper respiratory tract infection, a CDS tool built with the Heckerling Rule was used to stratify the risk of pneumonia. During usability testing, all human-computer interactions, including audio and continuous screen capture, were recorded using the Camtasia software. Participants’ comments and interactions with the tool during clinical sessions and participant comments during a postsession brief interview were placed into coding categories and analyzed for generalizable themes. RESULTS In the 6 encounters observed, primary care providers toggled between addressing either the computer or the patient during the visit. Minimal time was spent listening to the patient without engaging the EHR. Participants mostly used the CDS tool with the patient, asking questions to populate the calculator and discussing the results of the risk assessment; they reported the ability to do this as the major benefit of the tool. All providers were interrupted during their use of the CDS tool by the need to refer to other sections of the chart. In half of the visits, patients’ clinical symptoms challenged the applicability of the tool to calculate the risk of bacterial infection. Primary care providers rarely used the incorporated incentives for CDS usage, including progress notes and patient instructions. CONCLUSIONS Live usability testing of these CDS tools generated insights about their role in the patient-provider interaction. CDS may contribute to the interaction by being simultaneously viewed by the provider and patient. CDS can improve usability and lessen the strain it places on providers by being short, flexible, and customizable to unique provider workflow. A useful component of CDS is being as widely applicable as possible and ensuring that its functions represent the fastest way to perform a particular task.

scholarly journals A pilot study of the functionality and clinician acceptance of a clinical decision support tool to improve primary care of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Rossom ◽  
JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen ◽  
Patrick J. O’Connor ◽  
A. Lauren Crain ◽  
Laurel Nightingale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Objective Most Americans with opioid use disorder (OUD) do not receive indicated medical care. A clinical decision support (CDS) tool for primary care providers (PCPs) could address this treatment gap. Our primary objective was to build OUD-CDS tool and demonstrate its functionality and accuracy. Secondary objectives were to achieve high use and approval rates and improve PCP confidence in diagnosing and treating OUD. Methods A convenience sample of 55 PCPs participated. Buprenorphine-waivered PCPs (n = 8) were assigned to the intervention. Non-waivered PCPs (n = 47) were randomized to intervention (n = 24) or control (n = 23). Intervention PCPs received access to the OUD-CDS, which alerted them to patients at potentially increased risk for OUD or overdose and guided diagnosis and treatment. Control PCPs provided care as usual. Results The OUD-CDS was functional and accurate following extensive multi-phased testing. PCPs used the OUD-CDS in 5% of encounters with at-risk patients, far less than the goal of 60%. OUD screening confidence increased for all intervention PCPs and OUD diagnosis increased for non-waivered intervention PCPs. Most PCPs (65%) would recommend the OUD-CDS and found it helpful with screening for OUD and discussing and prescribing OUD medications. Discussion PCPs generally liked the OUD-CDS, but use rates were low, suggesting the need to modify CDS design, implementation strategies and integration with existing primary care workflows. Conclusion The OUD-CDS tool was functional and accurate, but PCP use rates were low. Despite low use, the OUD-CDS improved confidence in OUD screening, diagnosis and use of buprenorphine. NIH Trial registration NCT03559179. Date of registration: 06/18/2018. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03559179

scholarly journals Sustaining Use of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Primary Care Providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
A. L. Crain ◽  
JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen ◽  
Heidi L Ekstrom ◽  
Patrick J O'Connor ◽  
Karen L Margolis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Tool

Do pain specialists meet the needs of the referring physician? A survey of primary care providers

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane R. Wilkens, MD ◽  
Miles J. Belgrade, MD
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Psychological Issues ◽  
Pain Specialist ◽  
Noncancer Pain

Objective: To study the factors that influence the use of opioids in the management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) by primary care providers (PCPs) for patients returning from a pain specialist.Design: A survey of PCPs.Setting: Two physician groups in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area.Participants: Two seventy-six PCPs surveyed and 80 surveys returned. Main outcome measures: Participants rated the importance of specific concerns regarding the role of pain specialists and the use of opioids in the management of CNCP. Past experience with pain specialists, comfort using opioids, and opinions regarding a trilateral opioid agreement were also examined.Results: The top concerns for PCPs were as follows: the use of opioids in patients with chemical dependency or psychological issues, the escalation of opioid dosing, and the use of opioids in pain states without objective findings. They also ranked highly the importance of coordinating the return of patients from a pain specialist with explicit opioid instructions and the availability of consultation by phone or a timely follow-up visit. PCPs were supportive of the concept of a trilateral opioid agreement.Conclusions: PCPs have significant concerns regarding the prescribing of opioids in CNCP. They desire closer collaboration with pain specialists, including more explicit plans of care when patients are transferred back to them. The trilateral agreement may provide one framework for better collaboration.

scholarly journals “She Knows Me Best”: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Caregiver Views on the Role of the Primary Care Physician Follow-Up Post-Discharge

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Griffiths ◽  
Gaibrie Stephen ◽  
Tara Kiran ◽  
Karen Okrainec
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Post Discharge

Abstract BackgroundPatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (CHF) are at high-risk of readmission after hospital discharge. There is conflicting evidence however on whether timely follow-up with a primary care provider reduces that risk. The objective of this study is to understand the perspectives of patients with COPD and CHF, and their caregivers, on the role of primary care provider follow-up after hospital discharge.MethodsA qualitative study design with semi-structured interviews was conducted among patients or their family caregivers admitted with COPD or CHF who were enrolled in a multicenter mixed-methods study at three acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Participants were interviewed between December 2017 to January 2019, the majority discharged from hospital at least 30 days prior to their interview. Interviews were analyzed independently by three authors using a deductive directed content analysis, with the fourth author cross-comparing themes.ResultsInterviews with 16 participants (eight patients and eight caregivers) revealed four main themes. First, participants valued visiting their primary care provider after discharge to build upon their longitudinal relationship. Second, primary care providers played a key role in coordinating care. Third, there were mixed views on the ideal time for follow-up, with many participants expressing a desire to delay follow-up to stabilize following their acute hospitalization. Fourth, the link between the post-discharge visit and preventing hospital readmissions was unclear to participants, who often self-triaged based on their symptoms when deciding on the need for emergency care.ConclusionsPatients and caregivers valued in-person follow-up with their primary care provider following discharge from hospital because of the trust established through pre-existing longitudinal relationships. Our results suggest policy makers should focus on improving rates of primary care provider attachment and systems supporting informational continuity.

scholarly journals Effects of computer-aided clinical decision support systems in improving antibiotic prescribing by primary care providers: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 236-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Holstiege ◽  
Tim Mathes ◽  
Dawid Pieper
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support Systems ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prescribing Behavior ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Prescribing Practice

Abstract Objective To assess the effectiveness of computer-aided clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in improving antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Methods A literature search utilizing Medline (via PubMed) and Embase (via Embase) was conducted up to November 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster randomized trials (CRTs) that evaluated the effects of CDSS aiming at improving antibiotic prescribing practice in an ambulatory primary care setting were included for review. Two investigators independently extracted data about study design and quality, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Results Seven studies (4 CRTs, 3 RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. All studies were performed in the USA. Proportions of eligible patient visits that triggered CDSS use varied substantially between intervention arms of studies (range 2.8–62.8%). Five out of seven trials showed marginal to moderate statistically significant effects of CDSS in improving antibiotic prescribing behavior. CDSS that automatically provided decision support were more likely to improve prescribing practice in contrast to systems that had to be actively initiated by healthcare providers. Conclusions CDSS show promising effectiveness in improving antibiotic prescribing behavior in primary care. Magnitude of effects compared to no intervention, appeared to be similar to other moderately effective single interventions directed at primary care providers. Additional research is warranted to determine CDSS characteristics crucial to triggering high adoption by providers as a perquisite of clinically relevant improvement of antibiotic prescribing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document