Atomic Emission Detection for Gas Chromatograpic Analysis of Nitrogen-Containing Herbicides in Water

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1464-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman L Olson ◽  
Robert Carrell ◽  
Randal Cummings ◽  
Robert Rieck ◽  
Steven Reimer

Abstract A gas chromatography-atomic emission detection (GC–AED) system was used to analyze nitrogencontaining herbicides. Two methods of sample preparation were used to demonstrate the system’s applicability. Method 1 was U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 507. Method 2 was a modification of EPA Method 507 using larger sample volumes and smaller extract volumes to yield compound detection levels 30 times lower than detection levels from method 1. Analysis of replicate reagent water spikes with method 1 gave analyte recoveries ranging from 82 to 107%, with standard deviations of recovery of not more than 6.7%. Method 2 gave recoveries ranging from 50 to 112%, with a standard deviation of recovery of not more than 33%. A loss in recovery and precision with method 2 compared with method 1 was attributed to loss of more volatile analytes during extract concentration. Selectivity was demonstrated with solvent spiked with fuel oil and atrazine. Response factors generated with the GC–AED system showed compound-independent elemental linearity for analytes. Relative standard deviations of not more than 5.34% were obtained for 3 elements tested: nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine. An elemental calibration mixture was prepared to validate traditional methods of quantitation. Samples were analyzed for nitrogen-containing herbicides, which were quantitated with both an analyte calibration and an elemental calibration, and results were compared.

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1275-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Viorica Lopez-Avila ◽  
Marcela Alcaraz ◽  
Werner F Beckert

Abstract A capillary gas chromatography-atomic emission detection (GC–AED) method was developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Las Vegas, NV, for determination of selected organotin compounds. Here we report on an interlaboratory study to establish whether these compounds can reliably be detected and quantitated by this method and to establish the interlaboratory precision and accuracy with currently available instrumentation. A blind, balanced-replicate design was selected for this study, based on a recommendation of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. Ten laboratories volunteered for this study. Each laboratory received 5 calibration standards (pentylated organotin compounds), 3 pentylated soil or sediment extracts (prepared in our laboratory by an in situ complexation/supercritical fluid extraction method), and 1 pentylation blank. The participating laboratories analyzed the extracts according to our instructions and submitted the data to us for statistical analysis. Of 720 individual sample results, the number of outliers identified with the Cochran test was 60 (8.3%). Two laboratories accounted for most of the outliers. Results indicate that good chromatographic performance was achieved regardless of the type of injection inlet; however, electronic pressure control was needed to achieve acceptable chromatography for tetracyclohexyltin and tetraphenyltin. The intralaboratory precisions of the GC-AED method ranged from 1.3 to 22% relative standard deviation (RSD), depending on the compound. The interlaboratory method precisions ranged from 11 to 40% RSD over the concentration range tested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document