scholarly journals Comparisons of Karl Fischer Method with Oven Methods for Determination of Water in Forages and Animal Feeds

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Thiex ◽  
Terri Van Erem

Abstract In a comparative study of the Karl Fischer method with oven methods for determination of water in forages and animal feeds, oven methods yielded the following relative recoveries (expressed as a percentage of the recovery obtained by the Karl Fischer method) for hay, haylage, and corn silage, respectively: (1) drying at 135°C for 2 h (AOAC 930.15), 113,162, and 133%; (2) drying at 104°C for 3 h (AOAC 935.29), 96,122, and 113%; and (3) drying at 104°C for 6 h, 97, 129, and 117%. Relative recoveries for nonurea-containing and urea-containing feed, respectively, were as fol lows: (1) drying at 135°C for 2 h (AOAC 930.15), 116 and 2746% (2) drying at 104°C for 3 h (AOAC 935.29), 88 and 239%; (3) drying at 95°C for 5 h under vacuum (AOAC 934.01), 83 and 727% (4) drying at 104°C for 6 h, 90 and 427%; and (5) drying at 110°C for 3 h, 94 and 425%. Preliminary near-infrared reflectance calibrations for water (moisture) based on the Karl Fischer method were promising (r2 = 0.98; standard error of calibration = 0.20).

1966 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 726-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobby R Eader

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to compare the near-infrared spectrophotometric method and a Karl Fischer volumetric method with a vacuum oven method for the determination of moisture. Results by the near-infrared method were as accurate as and more rapid and specific than the vacuum oven method. Results by the Karl Fischer method were not as satisfactory; more study is needed to improve the precision of the method.


1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-262
Author(s):  
William R Windham ◽  
Franklin E Barton ◽  
James A Robertson

Abstract A collaborative study of moisture analysis by neai infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) has been completed involving 5 laboratories and 20 forage samples. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibrations for moisture were developed in the Associate Referee's laboratory from Karl Fischer (KF) and AOAC air oven (AO) (135°C for 2 h) moisture methods, respectively, and transferred to each collaborating laboratory's NIRS instrument. NIRS moisture data were validated with KF data from the Associate Referee's laboratory and AO data from each collaborating laboratory. The standard error of analysis of KF data by NIRS KF determination and AO data by NIRS AO determination ranged from 0.25 to 0.48% and from 0.74 to 1.88%, respectively. The standard errors between laboratories for NIRS KF and NIRS AO determinations were 0.2" and 0.39%, respectively. The standard error between moisture analyses by NIRS KF and NIRS AO calibrations, averaged across laboratories, was 0.42%. In addition, the standard error between laboratories for the AOAC AO method was 0.63%. The increase in standard error for the AOAC AO method was due to the random and systematic errors associated with the gravimetric techniques. The results indicate that NIRS analysis can accurately and precisely deterrr ine the moisture content of forages and forage crops because of th« very strong absorbance of water in the near infrared region.


1967 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 701-703
Author(s):  
Bobby R Rader

Abstract The determination of moisture in dried vegetables by a near-infrared speclrophotoraetric method, a Karl Fischer method, and a vacuum oven method was submitted to additional collaborative study. Results by the 3 methods showed good precision and agreement. The near-infrared and the Karl Fischer methods extract the moisture from the dried vegetables into dimethylformamide (DMF). In the near-infrared method the absorbance of the DMF solution is measured at 1.92 μ and compared to a standard curve. In the Karl Fischer method an aliquot of the DMF solution is added to formamide and titrated with the Karl Fischer reagent. The Karl Fischer and near-infrared methods are more specific than the vacuum oven method and can be used for a greater variety of samples. Both the Karl Fischer and near-infrared methods are recommended for adoption as official, first action.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document