517 ALDEN Based Determination of Culprit Drugs in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome: A 15-year Single Center Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S96-S96
Author(s):  
Paul M de Bustros ◽  
Anthony J Baldea ◽  
Arthur Sanford ◽  
Charles Bouchard ◽  
Cara Joyce

Abstract Introduction Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Syndrome (TENS) are severe and potentially lethal adverse drug reactions characterized by acute inflammation and subsequent necrosis of the skin, mucous membranes, and ocular surface. SJS/TENS is defined on a spectrum based on the percent of total body surface area (%TBSA) with epidermal detachment: SJS (< 10% TBSA), Overlap Syndrome (10–30%), and TENS (>30%). The purpose of our study was to perform a systemic retrospective trend analysis of SJS spectrum diagnoses and culprit drugs in 147 patients admitted to the burn center over the past 15 years with the final diagnosis of SJS/TENS. The burn center serves as a regional referral center for patients with suspected or confirmed SJS/TENS. These referrals came from the five other academic medical centers as well as private hospitals in the area. Methods The electronic medical records of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SJS/TENS admitted to the burn center from 2002 to 2017 were reviewed. Clinical data and the algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis (ALDEN) were used to identify the single most probable culprit drug. The following data were reviewed: date of admission, %TBSA with detachment, biopsy confirmation, and possible inciting agents. Chi-square tests were used to assess statistical significance for group comparisons. Results Over 15 years, 147 patients had a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of SJS/TENS, of which 67% (n =98) had a culprit drug identified. The most common spectrum classification was TENS (n=73), followed by SJS (n=46) and Overlap Syndrome (n=27). Anticonvulsants (n=24), fluoroquinolones (n=14), allopurinol (n=11), sulfa drugs (n=9), and NSAIDs (n=9) were the most common inciting agents. Between 2006–2017, the proportion of patients presenting with SJS increased as compared to TENS and Overlap syndrome (10% in 2002–2009 vs. 42% in 2010–2017, p< 0.01). Sulfa drug reactions were more prevalent in recent years (0% in 2002–2009 vs. 18% in 2010–2017, p=0.065) and fluoroquinolone-induced reactions in earlier years (21% in 2002–2009 vs. 6% in 2010–2017, p=0.068). Conclusions This is one of the largest single center series of SJS/TENS/Overlap cases in the US. Our data supports trends presented in the EuroSCAR (1997–2001) and RegiSCAR (2003–2012) studies. Applicability of Research to Practice The ALDEN algorithm provides an important and validated method for determining the probable culprit drug in SJS/TENS spectrum reactions. Trends in culprit drugs can shift over time based on changes in prescribing practices. Therefore, these trends need to be monitored in order to advise providers on which agents present the greatest risk to patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Han Y. Yin ◽  
Nicholas Hadjokas ◽  
Kanish Mirchia ◽  
Robert Swan ◽  
Samuel Alpert

Purpose. To report an unusual presentation of commercial cannabidiol (CBD) oil-induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN). Methods. A 56-year-old woman presented with acute onset of a diffuse, blistering, maculopapular rash with over 30% total body surface area (BSA) involvement two days after taking CBD oil sublingually for chronic pain. Biopsy confirmed SJS-TEN. Ophthalmology was consulted and mild eye involvement was found. She was started on topical cyclosporine, prednisone, moxifloxacin, and erythromycin ointment to prevent progression, which was successful. She was otherwise treated with supportive therapy in the intensive care burn unit and ultimately passed away from septic shock. Conclusion. In this case, we described an unusual drug-induced SJS from a commercial, non-FDA-regulated cannabis product. The use of a commercial CBD product should be cautioned due to potential for series of drug reactions to the cannabis product and the risk for reaction to other unregulated other pharmacological components.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S202-S203
Author(s):  
Michael Duplisea ◽  
Lori Chrisco ◽  
Felicia N Williams ◽  
Rabia Nizamani ◽  
Sarah L Laughon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a rare, severe mucocutaneous eruption caused by medications and resulting in diffuse epidermal detachment. Patients are often referred to burn units for specialized care. This study assesses trends in precipitating medications over 10 years at our Burn Center. Methods We performed a single-site, retrospective review at our burn center using the institutional burn registry and patient charts. Patients admitted from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018 identified as having SJS/TEN were eligible for inclusion. Demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis, treatment, inciting agents, and severity-of-illness score for TEN (SCORTEN) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann Whitney U test using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC). Results Biopsy-proven SJS, SJS/TEN overlap, or TEN was confirmed in 168 patients. Of these, 103 had a single identified offending drug. Of these patients, 36% had been exposed to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP), 11% to allopurinol, and 10% to lamotrigine. Trends in culprit drug by year are shown in Figure 1. The majority of SMX-TMP and penicillin cases occurred early in the period of study; lamotrigine and pembrolizumab cases occurred more recently. Patients exposed to allopurinol presented with higher SCORTENs than patients exposed to SMX-TMP, 2.9 vs 1.9, respectively (p< 0.035). Conclusions SMX-TMP once accounted for a large portion of SJS and TEN cases at our center. In recent years, lamotrigine has become a more common offending drug, prescribed in our cohort for psychiatric indications. Also notable, in the past year we have treated three patients with TEN due to immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) for metastatic or unresectable cancer. Paralleling the increasing use of immunotherapy has been a rise of immune-related adverse events, including severe skin toxicities. Further study is warranted to determine what can be done to prevent SJS/TEN from occurring in patients treated with these drugs. Applicability of Research to Practice Understanding emerging trends in causative agents of SJS/TEN will allow the burn community to focus education efforts for providers who prescribe these medications frequently. The psychiatric and oncology communities may benefit from increased awareness of the risk of SJS/TEN in patients receiving lamotrigine and immunotherapy, respectively.


Author(s):  
Punit S. Ramrakha ◽  
Kevin P. Moore ◽  
Amir H. Sam

This chapter discusses dermatological emergencies, including cutaneous drug reactions, erythroderma, urticaria and angio-oedema, autoimmune bullous disease, eczema herpeticum, herpes zoster, generalized pustular psoriasis, and Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 945-950
Author(s):  
Rachel M Nygaard ◽  
Frederick W Endorf

Abstract Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and Stevens–Johnson/TEN overlap syndrome (SJS/TEN) are severe exfoliative skin disorders resulting primarily from allergic drug reactions and sometimes from viral causes. Because of the significant epidermal loss in many of these patients, many of them end up receiving treatment at a burn center for expertise in the care of large wounds. Previous work on the treatment of this disease focused only on the differences in care of the same patients treated at nonburn centers and then transferred to burn centers. We wanted to explore whether patients had any differences in care or outcomes when they received definitive treatment at burn centers and nonburn centers. We queried the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 for patients with SJS, SJS/TEN, and TEN diagnoses. We considered burn centers as those with greater than 10 burn transfers to their center and fewer than 5 burn transfers out of their center in a year. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with treatment at a burn center and mortality. Using the National Inpatient Sample, a total of 1164 patients were identified. These were divided into two groups, nonburn centers vs burn centers, and those groups were compared for demographic characteristics as well as variables in their hospital course and outcome. Patients treated at nonburn centers were more likely to have SJS and patients treated at burn centers were more likely to have both SJS/TEN and TEN. Demographics were similar between treatment locations, though African-Americans were more likely to be treated at a burn center. Burn centers had higher rates of patients with extreme severity and mortality risks and a longer length of stay. However, burn centers had similar actual mortality compared to nonburn centers. Patients treated at burn centers had higher charges and were more likely to be transferred to long-term care after their hospital stay. The majority of patients with exfoliative skin disorders are still treated at nonburn centers. Patients with SJS/TEN and TEN were more likely to be treated at a burn center. Patients treated at burn centers appear to have more severe disease but similar mortality to those treated at nonburn centers. Further study is needed to determine whether patients with these disorders do indeed benefit from transfer to a burn center.


2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-382
Author(s):  
Joel Shuster

The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) MedWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting, preventable ADR to MedWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document