scholarly journals High-dose Versus Standard-dose Radiotherapy with Concurrent Chemotherapy in Stages II–III Esophageal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Gun Suh ◽  
Ik Jae Lee ◽  
Wong Sub Koom ◽  
Jihye Cha ◽  
Jong Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose

scholarly journals Standard-dose versus high-dose radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A prospective randomized study

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navin Nayan ◽  
M. Bhattacharyya ◽  
Vikas K. Jagtap ◽  
A. K. Kalita ◽  
R. Sunku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Prospective Randomized Study ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large Sample Size

Abstract Objective: The objective of this study is comparision of local and distant control rates with high-dose versus standard-dose radiotherapy along with concurrent chemotherapy in esophageal cancer – a prospective randomized study. Materials and Methods: Histologically proven Stage I–III patients with carcinoma esophagus were randomized into two groups. One group has been treated with standard-dose radiotherapy, i.e., a total dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 28#, 5 days/week). The other group (study arm) has received high-dose radiotherapy, i.e. a total dose of 64.8 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 36#, 5 days/week). Both groups have received 2 cycles of 3 weekly concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m[2] on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m[2] continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h on day 1–4). Follow-up response evaluation was done by both endoscopy and computed tomography scan after 6–8 weeks and after 2 months thereafter. Results: Out of a total of 28 patients, 68% showed a complete response, 14% showed partial response, and 18% patients developed progressive disease at first and subsequent follow up (median follow-up of 21 months). Among the complete response patients, rates were higher in high-dose group compared to standard-dose radiotherapy group (71% vs. 64%, P = 0.38). Treatment-related toxicities were acceptable in both groups. Conclusion: High-dose radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy seems to be more effective with acceptable toxicity in our study. However, further follow-up and large sample size may be required to validate the current study conclusion.

Definitive Concurrent Chemotherapy and High-dose (60-70 Gy) Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. S325 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hayashi ◽  
Y. Shibamoto ◽  
A. Miyakawa ◽  
T. Murai ◽  
S. Otsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose

scholarly journals Definitive Concurrent Chemotherapy and High Dose (60-70Gy) Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. E131-E132 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kondo ◽  
Y. Shibamoto ◽  
A. Hayashi ◽  
T. Takaoka ◽  
T. Murai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose

Survival of Patients Treated with High-dose Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Unresectable Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 06 ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Steven E Schild ◽  
Helen J Ross ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Dose ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma

Radiotherapy (RT) has been used to treat cancers for 110 years. Today, megavoltage RT is delivered with very precise linear accelerators. Computed tomography and/or positron-emission tomography are used to define both tumor and normal tissue volumes. Powerful computers analyze these volumes in 3D space and design complex treatment plans. Over time, the ratio of dose administered to tumor compared with dose administered to the normal structures has increased, resulting in a better therapeutic index and improved survival. In the 1970s and 1980s, the five-year survival rate of unresectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma was 5% with standard RT alone. Adding chemotherapy before or after radiation improved the five-year survival to about 15%. More recently, concurrent chemotherapy and RT has achieved five-year survival rates of up to 29%. Pilot trials employing chemotherapy and higher-dose RT have resulted in still better local control and survival. A phase III trial of chemotherapy plus either standard-dose RT (60Gy/30) or high-dose RT (74Gy/37) is ongoing. New technology is providing ways to improve the therapeutic ratio and administer greater RT doses more safely.

Survival of patients (pts) treated with high-dose radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544
Author(s):  
S. Schild ◽  
D. Graham ◽  
S. Hillman ◽  
S. Vora ◽  
G. Yolanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Technological Improvements ◽  
Improve Disease Control

7544 Background: NCCTG N0028 was a trial that determined the MTD of RT that could be given with carboplatin & paclitaxel was 74 Gy/34 fractions. This secondary analysis was performed to determine the survival of pts treated on this trial. Methods: Eligible pts had medically or surgically unresectable NSCLC, PS=0–1, weight loss <10% in the prior 3 months(mo), no prior therapy, adequate laboratory & pulmonary functions. Included were 25 pts with clinical stages I (4pts), II (1 pt), IIIa (12 pts), & IIIb (8 pts). Treatment included: weekly I.V. paclitaxel (50mg/m2) & carboplatin (AUC=2) during RT. The RT included 2 Gy daily to an initial dose of 70 Gy. The total dose was increased in 4 Gy increments until the MTD was determined. RT was delivered with 3-D treatment planning but no elective nodal RT. Three pts received 70 Gy, 18 pts received 74 Gy, & 4 pts received 78Gy. Results: Pts were followed until death or from 10–67 mo (median: 28mo) in those alive at last evaluation. The median survival (MS) of the entire cohort was 42mo. The 5 stages I-II pts had a MS of 53 mo & the 20 stage III pts had MS of 42mo. Conclusions: Standard dose RT is unable to sterilize disease in the majority of pts with unresectable NSCLC. While the addition of chemotherapy has significantly improved survival of these pts, the MS is generally 15–24 mo. These preliminary results suggest higher than standard doses of RT may improve disease control & prolong survival. A phase III trial comparing standard-dose RT(60Gy) to high-dose RT (74Gy) is open and should more definitively address the issue of RT dose with concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable NSCLC. Future technological improvements in imaging & targeting will provide methods to safely administer even greater RT doses which will likely further improve disease control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of radiotherapy duration on outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy on RTOG trials 8501 and 9405.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 119-119
Author(s):  
Christopher Leigh Hallemeier ◽  
Jennifer Moughan ◽  
Michael G. Haddock ◽  
Arnold M. Herskovic ◽  
Bruce D. Minsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
The Impact

119 Background: Radiotherapy (RT) interruptions have a negative impact on outcomes in many epithelial malignancies treated with definitive RT. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of RT duration on outcomes in patients (pts) with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: Pts treated with definitive CRT on RTOG trials 8501 and 9405 were included. Separate analyses were performed in pts receiving standard dose (SD-CRT; 50 Gy + 5FU + cisplatin) and high dose (HD-CRT; 64.8 Gy + 5FU + cisplatin) CRT. Local (LF) and regional (RF) failure were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. Disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to examine for correlation between RT duration (< vs. ≥ median) with LF, RF, DFS and OS. Results: In the SD-CRT cohort (n=235), 96 pts (41%) had ≥ 1 RT interruption for a median of 3 (IQR 1-6) days. The median RT duration was 39 (IQR 37-43) days. In UVA and MVA, RT duration was not associated with LF, RF, DFS, or OS. Estimated outcome rates are in the table. In the HD-CRT cohort (n=107), 64 pts (60%) had ≥ 1 RT interruption for a median of 3.5 (IQR 2-7.5) days. The median RT duration was 52 (IQR 50-57) days. In UVA, RT duration ≥ 52 days was associated with a 33% reduction in risk of DFS failure (HR=0.66, 95% CI [0.44-0.98], p=0.039) and a 29% reduction in risk of death (HR=0.71, 95% CI [0.48-1.06], p=0.09). When excluding the 25 pts with RT dose < 64.8 Gy, RT duration was not associated with DFS or OS. Conclusions: In pts with esophageal cancer receiving definitive SD-CRT, an association between RT duration and outcomes was not observed. In pts receiving HD-CRT, longer RT duration was associated with improved DFS, which may have been due to a significant number of deaths at RT dose < 64.8 Gy. Supported by NCI U10 grants CA21661, CA180868, CA180822, CA37422. Clinical trial information: NCT00002631. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document