scholarly journals Re: Microsatellite Instability and BRAF Mutation Testing in Colorectal Cancer Prognostication

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (8) ◽  
pp. dju180-dju180 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rosty ◽  
E. J. Williamson ◽  
M. Clendenning ◽  
R. J. Walters ◽  
M. D. Walsh ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (15) ◽  
pp. 1151-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Lochhead ◽  
Aya Kuchiba ◽  
Yu Imamura ◽  
Xiaoyun Liao ◽  
Mai Yamauchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Sophiya Karki ◽  
Rashna Madan ◽  
Sarah Schmitt ◽  
Ziyan Y. Pessetto ◽  
Andrew K. Godwin ◽  
...  

132 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-associated deaths in the United States. Some of the poor prognostic factors for metastatic CRC (mCRC) include BRAF V600E mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) that result from mutation or loss of mismatch-repair genes. While the prognostic value of MSI-high CRC for early-stage patients treated with resection and adjuvant chemotherapy is favorable, the prognostic value of BRAF mutation is still unclear. Furthermore, the impact of BRAF mutation with concurrent microsatellite instability on overall survival has not been well investigated. Methods: Here, we collected BRAF mutation status and MSI status of stage II/III CRC patients (n=106) treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center between September 2009 and July 2020 and compared overall survival between 4 subtypes:MSI-H/BRAF mutant (n=16), MSS/BRAF mutant (n=4), MSI-H/BRAF WT (n=17) and MSS/BRAF WT (n=69), further stratifying patients by age at diagnosis and tumor location. Molecular data were obtained from molecular oncology laboratory as PCR or IHC-based or acquired from outside records. Subgroup analyses were done for stage II and stage III cancers. Results: Table shows the patient characteristics. From our preliminary analysis, MSI-H CRC was found to be primarily a right-sided tumor (MSI-H/BRAF mutant: 94% and MSI-H/BRAF WT 76%). On the contrary, MSS CRC had a more heterogenous localization, spanning left colon, right colon and rectum. In our patient cohort, median survival was not reached for stage II patients whereas for stage III patients, BRAF mutation was associated with poor median survival irrespective of MSI status (MSS/BRAF mutant: 27 months and MSI-H/BRAF mutant 29 months). Median overall survival was found to be 87 months, not reached, 27 months and 29 months for MSS/BRAF WT, MSI-H/BRAF WT, MSS/BRAF mutant and MSI-H/BRAF mutant, respectively. Although associated with poor survival, MSI-H/BRAF mutant displayed later age at diagnosis (mean age 73) compared to MSS/BRAF mutant (mean age 60, p-value<0.029). Conclusions: Our finding suggests that BRAF mutation has poor prognosis even at earlier stages of the disease and that MSS/BRAF mutation, in particular, has the worst prognostic features. These findings highlight the need for BRAF-targeted therapy for CRC at any stage. Due to small sample size, however, our results warrant validation in a larger cohort. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 668-668
Author(s):  
Oscar Murcia ◽  
Miriam Juárez ◽  
Eva Hernández-Illán ◽  
Maria Rodriguez-Soler ◽  
Mar Giner-Calabuig ◽  
...  

668 Background: The aim of this study was to validate a molecular classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) based on microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status, BRAF, and KRAS and investigate each subtype’s response to chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective observational study included a population-based cohort of 878 CRC patients. We classified tumours into five different subtypes based on BRAF and KRAS mutation, CIMP status, and MSI. Patients with advanced stage II (T4N0M0) and stage III tumours received 5-fluoruracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy or no adjuvant treatment based on clinical criteria. The main outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Patients with the combination of microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours, BRAF mutation and CIMP positive exhibited the worst prognosis in univariate (log rank P < 0.0001) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.05-2.93, P = 0.03) after adjusting for age, sex, chemotherapy, and TNM stage. Treatment with 5-FU-based regimens improved prognosis in patients with the combination of MSS tumours, KRAS mutation and CIMP negative (log rank P = 0.003) as well as in patients with MSS tumours plus BRAF and KRAS wild-type and CIMP negative (log-rank P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and TNM stage in the multivariate analysis, only patients with the latter molecular combination had independently improved prognosis after adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.24-3.44, P = 0.005). Conclusions: We confirmed the prognostic value of stratifying CRC according to molecular subtypes using MSI, CIMP status, and somatic KRAS and BRAF mutation. Patients with traditional chromosomally unstable tumours obtained the best benefit from adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Loughrey ◽  
P. M. Waring ◽  
A. Tan ◽  
M. Trivett ◽  
S. Kovalenko ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14033-e14033
Author(s):  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Ryota Nakanishi ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Takefumi Ohga ◽  
...  

e14033 Background: Recent evidence highlights the potential prognostic and predictive value of BRAF and K-RAS gene alterations in patients with colorectal cancer. To determine whether differences exist in the molecular mechanisms driving colorectal cancer between Japanese and Western, we characterized Japanese patients with colorectal cancer by assessing genetic alterations involved in cancer progression and response to treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 254 Japanese diagnosed with colorectal cancer at our institution between 1994 and 2009. Mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13 and BRAF codon 600 were identified by direct sequencing. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was determined by genotyping in the 5 loci. Associations between KRAS or BRAF mutation and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were evaluated. Results: KRAS and BRAF mutation were detected in 33.5% and 6.7% of all patients, respectively. KRAS mutation was correlated with poor recurrence free survival (RFS) (p = 0.03), especially in stage II patients (p = 0.007). BRAF mutation was significantly correlated with the anatomical site of tumor (p < 0.001), tumor grade (p = 0.001) and high frequency of microsatellite instability (p < 0.001). BRAF mutation was also correlated with poor overall survival in all cases of patients (p = 0.009). Overall, the background of KRAS and BRAF mutation was almost similar between CRCs of Western countries and those of Japanese. However, KRAS mutation status was considered to be helpful to predict recurrence in Japanese patients with stage II CRC. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that BRAF and K-RAS mutation plays an important role in the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer. These results indicate that molecular analysis for BRAF and K-RAS may be a useful biomarker for identifying patients with right-sided colon cancer with poor outcome who may benefit from a more individualized course of therapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Price ◽  
Carol Beeke ◽  
Amanda Rose Townsend ◽  
Louisa Lo ◽  
Roy Amitesh ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 787-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J Weisenberger ◽  
Kimberly D Siegmund ◽  
Mihaela Campan ◽  
Joanne Young ◽  
Tiffany I Long ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
pp. 1225-1228
Author(s):  
Shree G. Sharma ◽  
Margaret L. Gulley

Abstract Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Understanding the biochemical pathways underlying carcinogenesis has paved the way for more effective treatments and better outcomes. BRAF mutation testing has a role in (1) differentiating sporadic colorectal cancer from Lynch syndrome, (2) identifying cancers lacking BRAF mutation that are more likely to respond to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy, and (3) conferring worse prognosis in colorectal cancer that is microsatellite stable. Several analytic methods are available to reliably detect BRAF mutations. Real-time polymerase chain reaction identifies the most common BRAF mutation, V600E, in frozen or paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue. Traditional DNA sequencing and the somewhat more-sensitive pyrosequencing method can detect multiple alternative BRAF mutations that are predicted to constitutively activate signaling through the MAPK pathway, promoting tumor growth and survival. Pathologists play an important role in assay validation as well as in consulting with clinicians about indications for testing, ensuring quality of testing, and interpreting results in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors important in the management of affected patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document