scholarly journals Selection of patients with left breast cancer for IMRT with deep inspiration breath-hold technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Shen CHANG ◽  
Chia-Hsin CHEN ◽  
Kuo-Chi LIU ◽  
Chia-Sheng HO ◽  
Miao-Fen CHEN

Abstract The deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique has been utilized to reduce the cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing radiotherapy. Further investigation of the parameters for selecting which patients will benefit most from DIBH is essential. We performed dosimetric comparisons for 21 patients with left-sided BC who had both computed tomography (CT)-based free-breathing (FB) and DIBH plans. The doses to the heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) and any reduction due to the DIBH technique were analysed. Based on CTFB plans, dosimetric analysis revealed that the irradiation doses to the heart and LAD were significantly correlated with the target volume, the ipsilateral lung volume (ILV) and the total lung volume (TLV). When patients had an ILV ≥ 950 cm3 or a TLV ≥ 2200 cm3, the irradiation doses to the heart and LAD were significantly decreased. Furthermore, the reduction in the mean heart dose (MHD) was correlated to the difference in lung volume between FB and DIBH. The difference in ILV between DIBH and FB of 1.8 indicated that the patients obtained more benefit from the DIBH technique. The data suggest that lung volume (ILV and TLV) measured on a CT-simulation scan and the difference between FB and DIBH could be utilized to help select patients for DIBH.

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Walston ◽  
Allison M. Quick ◽  
Karla Kuhn ◽  
Yi Rong

Purpose: To present our clinical workflow of incorporating AlignRT for left breast deep inspiration breath-hold treatments and the dosimetric considerations with the deep inspiration breath-hold protocol. Material and Methods: Patients with stage I to III left-sided breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy were considered candidates for deep inspiration breath-hold technique for their external beam radiation therapy. Treatment plans were created on both free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold computed tomography for each patient to determine whether deep inspiration breath-hold was beneficial based on dosimetric comparison. The AlignRT system was used for patient setup and monitoring. Dosimetric measurements and their correlation with chest wall excursion and increase in left lung volume were studied for free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold plans. Results: Deep inspiration breath-hold plans had significantly increased chest wall excursion when compared with free breathing. This change in geometry resulted in reduced mean and maximum heart dose but did not impact lung V20 or mean dose. The correlation between chest wall excursion and absolute reduction in heart or lung dose was found to be nonsignificant, but correlation between left lung volume and heart dose showed a linear association. It was also identified that higher levels of chest wall excursion may paradoxically increase heart or lung dose. Conclusion: Reduction in heart dose can be achieved for many left-sided breast and chest wall patients using deep inspiration breath-hold. Chest wall excursion as well as left lung volume did not correlate with reduction in heart dose, and it remains to be determined what metric will provide the most optimal and reliable dosimetric advantage.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Falco ◽  
Bartłomiej Masojć ◽  
Agnieszka Macała ◽  
Magdalena Łukowiak ◽  
Piotr Woźniak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with left breast cancer who undergo radiotherapy have a non-negligible risk of developing radiation-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardioprotection can be achieved through better treatment planning protocols and through respiratory gating techniques, including deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). Several dosimetric studies have shown that DIBH reduces the cardiac dose, but clinical data confirming this effect is limited. The aim of the study was to compare the mean heart dose (MHD) in patients with left breast cancer who underwent radiotherapy at our institution as we transitioned from non-gated free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy to gated radiotherapy (FB-GRT), and finally to DIBH. Patients and methods Retrospective study involving 2022 breast cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy at West Pomeranian Oncology Center in Szczecin from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017. We compared the MHD in these patients according to year of treatment and technique. Results Overall, the MHD for patients with left breast cancer in our cohort was 3.37 Gy. MHD values in the patients treated with DIBH were significantly lower than in patients treated with non-gated FB (2.1 vs. 3.48 Gy, p < 0.0001) and gated FB (3.28 Gy, p < 0.0001). The lowest MHD values over the four-year period were observed in 2017, when nearly 85% of left breast cancer patients were treated with DIBH. The proportion of patients exposed to high (> 4 Gy) MHD values decreased every year, from 40% in 2014 to 7.9% in 2017, while the percentage of patients receiving DIBH increased. Conclusions Compared to free-breathing techniques (both gated and non-gated), DIBH reduces the mean radiation dose to the heart in patients with left breast cancer. These findings support the use of DIBH in patients with left breast cancer treated with radiotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose to organs at risk for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy in patients with lef-sided breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after partial mastectomy. Methods: One hundred patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent DIBH and FB planning computed tomography scans, and the 2 techniques were compared. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and left lung. Results: Radiation dose to heart, LAD, and left lung was significantly lower for DIBH than for free breathing plans. The median mean heart dose for DIBH technique in comparison with FB was 1.21 Gy, and 3.22 Gy respectively; for LAD, 4.67 versus 24.71 Gy; and for left lung 8.32 Gy versus 9.99 Gy. Conclusion: DIBH is an effective technique to reduce cardiac and lung radiation exposure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 20210295
Author(s):  
Christina Schröder ◽  
Sebastian Kirschke ◽  
Eyck Blank ◽  
Sophia Rohrberg ◽  
Robert Förster ◽  
...  

Objective: To prospectively analyze the feasibility of an algorithm for patient preparation, treatment planning and selection for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment of left-sided breast cancer. Methods: From 02/2017 to 07/2019, 135 patients with left-sided breast cancer were selected and prepared for radiotherapy in DIBH. 99 received radiotherapy for the breast alone and 36 for the breast including the lymphatic drainage (RNI). Treatment plans DIBH and free breathing (FB) were calculated. Dosimetrical analyses were performed and criteria were defined to assess whether a patient would dosimetrically profit from DIBH. Results: Of the 135 patients, 97 received a DIBH planning CT and 72 were selected for treatment in DIBH according to predefined criteria. When using DIBH there was a mean reduction of the DmeanHeart of 2.8 Gy and DmeanLAD of 4.2 Gy. seven patients did not benefit from DIBH regarding DmeanHeart, 23 regarding DmeanLAD. For the left lung the V20Gy was reduced by 4.9%, the V30Gy by 2.7% with 15 and 29 patients not benefitting from DIBH, respectively. In the 25 patients treated in FB, the benefit of DIBH would have been lower than for patients treated with DIBH (ΔDmeanHeart0.7 Gy vs 3.4 Gy). Conclusion: Dosimetrically, DIBH is no “one fits all” approach. However, there is a statistically significant benefit when looking at a larger patient population. DIBH should be used for treatment of left-sided breast cancer in patients fit for DIBH. Advances in knowledge: This analysis offers a well-designed dosimetrical analysis in patients treated with DIBH radiotherapy in an “every day” cohort.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Al-Hammadi ◽  
Palmira Caparrotti ◽  
Carole Naim ◽  
Jillian Hayes ◽  
Katherine Rebecca Benson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, parts of the heart are irradiated, which may lead to late toxicity. We report on the experience of single institution with cardiac-sparing radiotherapy using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (V-DIBH) and compare its dosimetric outcome with free breathing (FB) technique. Patients and methods Left-sided breast cancer patients, treated at our department with postoperative radiotherapy of breast/chest wall +/– regional lymph nodes between May 2015 and January 2017, were considered for inclusion. FB-computed tomography (CT) was obtained and dose-planning performed. Cases with cardiac V25Gy ≥ 5% or risk factors for heart disease were coached for V-DIBH. Compliant patients were included. They underwent additional CT in V-DIBH for planning, followed by V-DIBH radiotherapy. Dose volume histogram parameters for heart, lung and optimized planning target volume (OPTV) were compared between FB and BH. Treatment setup shifts and systematic and random errors for V-DIBH technique were compared with FB historic control. Results Sixty-three patients were considered for V-DIBH. Nine (14.3%) were non-compliant at coaching, leaving 54 cases for analysis. When compared with FB, V-DIBH resulted in a significant reduction of mean cardiac dose from 6.1 +/– 2.5 to 3.2 +/– 1.4 Gy (p < 0.001), maximum cardiac dose from 51.1 +/– 1.4 to 48.5 +/– 6.8 Gy (p = 0.005) and cardiac V25Gy from 8.5 +/– 4.2 to 3.2 +/– 2.5% (p < 0.001). Heart volumes receiving low (10–20 Gy) and high (30–50 Gy) doses were also significantly reduced. Mean dose to the left anterior coronary artery was 23.0 (+/– 6.7) Gy and 14.8 (+/– 7.6) Gy on FB and V-DIBH, respectively (p < 0.001). Differences between FB- and V-DIBH-derived mean lung dose (11.3 +/– 3.2 vs. 10.6 +/– 2.6 Gy), lung V20Gy (20.5 +/– 7 vs. 19.5 +/– 5.1 Gy) and V95% for the OPTV (95.6 +/– 4.1 vs. 95.2 +/– 6.3%) were non-significant. V-DIBH-derived mean shifts for initial patient setup were ≤ 2.7 mm. Random and systematic errors were ≤ 2.1 mm. These results did not differ significantly from historic FB controls. Conclusions When compared with FB, V-DIBH demonstrated high setup accuracy and enabled significant reduction of cardiac doses without compromising the target volume coverage. Differences in lung doses were non-significant.


Author(s):  
Anh Phuong Le

TÓM TẮT Đối với ung thư vú (UTV) xạ trị là điều trị bổ túc cần thiết giúp giảm tái phát tại chỗ tại vùng, gia tăng sống còn. Tuy nhiên, xạ trị có tác dụng phụ lên tim mạch nhất là với UTV trái. Nhiều nghiên cứu đã chứng minh biến chứng và tử vong do tim mạch tăng tỉ lệ thuận với liều trung bình lên tim. Các kỹ thuật xạ trị mới trong xạ trị ung thư vú trái giúp tối ưu hóa liều vào thể tích xạ và bảo vệ tốt hơn cơ quan lành, càng đòi hỏi độ chính xác cao khi đặt bệnh. Các sai số do thiết bị hoặc đặt bệnh sẽ dẫn đến nguy cơ quá liều dung nạp hoặc thiếu liều và có nguy cơ tái phát. Vì vậy, xạ trị đòi hỏi sự chính xác cao trong suốt quá trình từ mô phỏng đến lập kế hoạch và tiến hành xạ trị. Xạ trị ung thư vú trái phối hợp hít sâu nín thở (DIBH - Deep Inspiration Breath - hold) và hệ thống quản lý bề mặt quang học (OSMS - Optical Surface Management System) làm cho tim di chuyển ra xa hơn khỏi vú, thành ngực trong quá trình xạ trị, giúp giảm liều tim một cách rõ rệt, vẫn đảm bảo được liều xạ lên thể tích đích. Ưu điểm của OSMS ngoài áp dụng cho đặt bệnh nhanh không cần xăm dấu trên da còn giám sát thời gian thực trong toàn bộ quá trình điều trị. Khi nhịp thở của bệnh nhân vượt quá một ngưỡng nhất định (0,3cm) chùm tia bức xạ sẽ bị tắt để ngăn ngừa độc tính. Do đó, hiểu và nắm rõ lợi ích quy trình đặt bệnh giúp đạt mục tiêu điều trị đồng thời giảm thời gian đặt bệnh để người bệnh có tâm lý thoải mái hơn, giảm áp lực về số lượng bệnh, nhất là đối với các trung tâm xạ trị lớn. ABSTRACT BENEFITS OF LEFT BREAST CANCER RADIATION COMBINATION OF DEEP INSPIRATION BREATH - HOLD AND OPTICAL SURFACE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRUEBEAM MACHINE AT CANCER HOSPITAL HO CHI MINH CITY Background: For breast cancer, radiation therapy is an essential adjuvant treatment to help reduce local recurrence and increase survival. However, radiation therapy has adverse effects on the cardiovascular systemespecially for left breast cancer. Several studies have demonstrated that cardiovascular morbidity and mortality increase in proportion to the mean cardiac dose. New radiotherapy techniques in radiation therapy for left breast cancer help optimize dose to radiation volume and better protect healthy organs, which requires high accuracy when patient set - up. Errors due to equipment or patient set - up will lead to the risk of overdosage or underdosage and risk of relapse. Therefore, radiation therapy requires high precision throughout the process from simulation to planning and conducting radiation therapy. Radiation therapy for left breast cancer combined with Deep Inspiration Breath - hold (DIBH) and Optical Surface Management System (OSMS)causes the heart to move further away from the breast and chest wall during radiation therapy, helping to reduce the cardiac dose significantly, still ensuring the radiation dose to the target volume. The advantage of OSMS is that in addition to being applied for fastpatient set - up, without tattooing on the skin, it also provides real - time monitoring during the entire treatment process. When the patient’s breathing rate exceeds a certain threshold (0,3cm) the radiation beam is turned off to prevent toxicity. Therefore, understanding and understanding the benefits of patient set - up helps to achieve treatment goals, while reducing patient set - up time for more comfort, reducing pressure on the number of patients, especially for patients large radiotherapy center. Keyword: Radiation therapy for left breast cancer, Deep Inspiration Breath - hold, Optical Surface Management System, cardiovascular risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document