Child Support Policy in Australia and the United Kingdom: Changing Priorities But A Similar Tough Deal for Children?

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Fehlberg ◽  
M. Maclean
2020 ◽  
pp. 232949652096821
Author(s):  
Zoë Goodall ◽  
Kay Cook

The stigmatization of single mothers who receive child support proliferates in news media, policy, and popular culture. Drawing on critical stigma literature, we examined data from interviews conducted with child support recipients in Australia and the United Kingdom. Our analysis examined how women receiving child support experienced stigma, how stigma was applied to other women in similar situations, and the political implications of these framings. Our interview data suggested child support stigma can be grouped into three categories, where women were seen to contravene maternal norms, patriarchal norms, and/or familial norms. These norms sanctioned mothers’ use of, amount of, and reliance on child support, viewing it fundamentally as men’s money that women take, rather than the contribution of a nonresident parent to their children’s upbringing. The source of stigma may have been ex-partners, child support bureaucratic systems, or recipients themselves, but the social and political functions of child support stigma remained the same: it discouraged solidarity between recipients and encouraged policy reform that further disadvantaged them.


1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Bingley ◽  
Gauthier Lanot ◽  
Elizabeth Symons ◽  
Ian Walker

2009 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishan Fernando ◽  
Gordon Prescott ◽  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Kathryn Greaves ◽  
Hamish McKenzie

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 800-801
Author(s):  
Michael F. Pogue-Geile

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1076-1077
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Gutek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document