Mental health screening and brief assessments

Author(s):  
Michael P. Maloney ◽  
Joel Dvoskin ◽  
Jeffrey L. Metzner

Screening and assessment are a core component of psychiatric care in any setting. In jails and prisons, the process, structure, content and timing of screenings and assessments are vital parts of the healthcare system. While the number of incarcerated persons is clear, the actual number of incarcerated prisoners who suffer from a mental disorder or independent psychiatric symptoms is difficult to determine because of methodological issues (e.g., different definitions of mental illness, different thresholds of severity, etc.) as well as wide variation in the nature (e.g. prison, jail, police lockup), size, and mental health service delivery systems of various settings. However, despite differences in methodology, geographic area, and other issues (e.g., types of facility, when studies were conducted, etc.), virtually every relevant study has concluded that a significant number of prisoners have serious mental illnesses and that the numbers of mentally ill prisoners are increasing. Because people with mental illnesses are at risk of suicide and exacerbations of their mental illnesses, correctional institutions need to identify such persons in a timely manner and provide appropriate clinical interventions. This chapter addresses the initial mental health screening of persons entering prisons and jails, with a special emphasis on suicide risk screening and follow-up clinical assessments of prisoners whose receiving or intake screening results suggest the likelihood that treatment or suicide prevention efforts will be necessary.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 36-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Howe-Martin ◽  
Stephanie L. Lawrence ◽  
Bryan Jester ◽  
Nancy de la Garza ◽  
Natalie Benedetto ◽  
...  

36 Background: ASCO guidelines recommend cancer survivors be evaluated, treated, & reassessed for depression & anxiety along the trajectory of care. To meet these guidelines, UT Southwestern Moncrief Cancer Institute instituted an integrated approach to mental health screening, assessment, & navigation called MH-SCAN. (Andersen, BL, Rowland, JH, Somerfield, MR. Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline adaptation.J Onc Prac, 2015. 11(2): p. 133-134.) Methods: MH-SCAN uses the Vital Sign6 (VS6) program, a web-based application to screen & monitor psychiatric symptoms, and to give feedback regarding measurement-based care (MBC). Measures are repeated at 2-week intervals when possible for those who need treatment. Our implementation process, including training & workflows, will be reviewed. Results: Patients (N = 415) enrolled from 9/1/15 to 8/1/16 in our community-based Survivorship Program (see table) were screened using VS6, of which 119 reported symptoms indicating potential depression. Over 90% of that subset reported moderately severe symptoms and 87% endorsing comorbid symptoms of anxiety. Approximately 60% of the original sample completed reassessment within 4 weeks. Over half continued to endorse significant depressive symptoms, as well as suicidal ideation and comorbid anxiety. Conclusions: Implementing ASCO recommendations for mental health screening, assessment, and treatment adherence, while challenging, is feasible. Our preliminary data underscores its importance among survivors. The MH-SCAN protocol provides a useful approach to implementing screening guidelines efficiently and effectively, thus addressing mental health comorbidities within oncology and primary care.[Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Jordan Jaffee

Calls for stricter gun control and mental health screening often come on the heels of school shootings, which have raised national concerns about school safety. The implication is that people with psychiatric disabilities are dangerous or threatening, and that preventing them from owning guns will make schools safer. This paper challenges this assumption by considering dominant discourses about school safety and mental health alongside the increasing militarization of U.S. schools. Advocating reducing violence by identifying individuals with psychiatric disabilities—or those labelled with mental illnesses presumed to render them dangerous—erases the profound state violence schools engender in the service of empire while perpetuating ableist assumptions about people with psychiatric disabilities. In the age of empire and endless imperialist war, we need to challenge prevailing conceptions of both school safety and mental health.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Arai ◽  
Daisuke Mori ◽  
Tetsu Kawamura ◽  
Hideo Fumimoto ◽  
Masagi Shimazaki ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janni Ammitzbøll ◽  
Bjørn E. Holstein ◽  
Lisbeth Wilms ◽  
Anette Andersen ◽  
Anne Mette Skovgaard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document