Lessons learned from health impact assessment experience around the world: where to next?

Author(s):  
Monica O’Mullane
Author(s):  
Bethany Rogerson ◽  
Ruth Lindberg ◽  
Fran Baum ◽  
Carlos Dora ◽  
Fiona Haigh ◽  
...  

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and Health in All Policies (HiAP) are policy tools used to include health considerations in decision-making processes across sectors such as transportation, education, and criminal justice that can play a role in improving health and equity. This article summarizes proceedings from an international convening of HIA and HiAP experts held in July 2019 in Barcelona, Spain. The presentations and panel discussions included different models, best practices, and lessons learned, including from government, international banks, think tanks, and academia. Participants discussed ideas from around the world for cross-sector collaboration to advance health. The convening covered the following topics: community engagement, building greater understanding of and support for HiAP, and exploring how mandates for HIA and HiAP approaches may advance health and equity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Mekel ◽  
P Martin-Olmedo ◽  
T Classen

Abstract Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has various origins: environmental health, health promotion with the perspective of the wider determinants of health, and health equity. These three individual but related areas are linked by the overall aim of promoting healthier programmes, policies and projects, which are developed in non-health sectors mostly. As a consequence, this led to a significant use of HIA worldwide. The areas are complementary, but given their different original frameworks, applied methodologies may differ. Another typology of characterizing HIA can be done by the purpose for which HIA has been conducted in practice: mandated, decision support, advocacy and community-led HIA. These forms are important with regard to HIA implementation strategies. By now, the consideration of health in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an established feature, not least due to the mandatory legal basis in many countries of the world. However, this situation is different for application in other policy areas so far. Some countries, in the absence of specific HIA legislation, have established HIA support units to conduct, commission, support HIA and deliver training. Advocacy and community-led HIA are mainly carried out by non-governmental organisations and universities. However, in general the potential of HIA has not yet been fully recognised: HIA is seen as a time-consuming and costly process and the effectiveness of HIA has not yet been communicated convincingly. The Health in All Policies approach is becoming increasingly important in the policy arena as a strategy to reduce non-communicable diseases by policies from non-health sectors. This requires different public health methods for implementation. HIA is particularly suitable for this. This development offers new opportunities for the implementation of HIA, which will be presented in detail.


2016 ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Phayong Thepaksorn ◽  
Wattasit Siriwong ◽  
Sathirakorn Pongpanich

The objective of this paper is to review the integration of health impact assessment (HIA) into environmental health assessment (EIA) or EHIA, existing legal requirements for health risk analyses, and lessons learned for integrating HIA within EIA processes. The authors undertook literature searches for EHIA practices through academic publications, reports, and websites of pub-lic organizations and related agencies in Thailand. We examined and synthesized the HIA system development, regulations, and examples of integrated EHIA. In conclusion, the implementation of EHIA still faces many obstacles, especially in such com-plex sector policy environments. The uncertainties, lack of evidence base, and challenges in imple-menting EHIA within the prevailing political and cultural contexts constrain decision-making andremain under-developed. Methodologies and tools have to fit with the available data and resources. The EHIA evaluation requires analytical validity, relevance, stakeholder engagement, and public involvement. The review resulted in the following recommendations to increasing Thailand’s EHIA capacity: 1) develop tools and guidelines for implementation in each project types; 2) train EHIA experts and conduct EHIA courses to build capacity; 3) ensure meaningful participation of private sector and the public; 4) bring together all parties in the debate, and build consensus throughcommunity participation and the upholding of environmental justice including EHIA communication; and 5) work to ensure strong public participation and political engagement.


Public Health ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 15-33
Author(s):  
D. A. Khalturina ◽  
V. A. Zykov ◽  
T. S. Zubkova

This study presents analysis of the international and Russian experience of implementation of “health in all policies” approach into legislation, as well as of health impact assessment. Certain steps towards the implementation of this approach have already been made in Russia, however, in general, there is still a lot to be done. It was revealed that the current system regulatory impact assessment (RIA) in Russia has a narrow focus and is focused on protecting the interests of business, which does not correspond to the well-established world practice, which presupposes complex RIA, including the impact of regulation on public health. Recommendations for strengthening the principle of “health by all policies” in Russian legislation and the introduction of the practice of assessing the regulatory impact on public health in Russia are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document