Neuromuscular blockade and reversal
Over the past 70 years since the introduction of d-tubocurarine, the search for an ideal neuromuscular blocking agent has led to the development of the depolarizing drug, succinylcholine (suxamethonium), with its rapid onset of action and plasma metabolism, and a series of non-depolarizing agents of which there are two groups: benzylisoquinoliniums (e.g. atracurium, cisatracurium and mivacurium) and aminosteroidal agents (e.g. pancuronium, vecuronium and rocuronium). The need to monitor neuromuscular block perioperatively to ensure the appropriate dose of any neuromuscular blocking drug is given has led to the development of several nerve stimulation techniques. Particularly useful clinically are the train-of-four twitch response, double-burst stimulation, and the post-tetanic count. Their benefits and limitations are considered in this chapter. The most suitable equipment to monitor neuromuscular block and the appropriate anatomical sites for stimulation are discussed. To prevent residual block with its pathophysiological consequences such as upper airway and pharyngeal dysfunction and potential respiratory failure at the end of surgery, antagonizing agents are used. These are of two types: anticholinesterases such as neostigmine and edrophonium, and the γ-cyclodextrin, sugammadex. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking drugs and their antagonists are altered by the extremes of age, obesity, and several disease states including renal and hepatic failure, neuromuscular disorders, and critical illness. The altered response to all these drugs in these pathologies, which is related to their metabolism and excretion, is considered in detail, together with their other side-effects including the particular disadvantages to the use of succinylcholine.