scholarly journals I.—RICHARD AVENARIUS AND HIS GENERAL THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE, EMPIRIOICRITICSM

Mind ◽  
1897 ◽  
Vol VI (4) ◽  
pp. 449-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRIEDRICH CARSTANJEN
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge

Legal Ontologies in ICT and Law

2011 ◽  
pp. 51-66
Author(s):  
Witold Abramowicz ◽  
Piotr Stolarski ◽  
Tadeusz Tomaszewski
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Ontology Engineering ◽  
Knowledge Modeling ◽  
Specialized Knowledge ◽  
General Application ◽  
Knowledge Models ◽  
Usability Issue ◽  
Legal Ontologies

As discussed in the fouth chapter, re-usability is frequently declared as sine qua non feature of modern ontology engineering. Although thoroughly examined in general theory of knowledge management models the re-usability issue is still barely a declaration in the domain of legal ontologies. The similar situation also applies to statute-specific ontologies. Those knowledge modeling entities are well described especially as an opposition to the general application legal ontologies. Yet it is trivial to say that most of the developed legal ontologies so far are those generic ones. And this sole fact should not surprise as the very specialized knowledge models – usually harder to develop – are at the same time narrowed with their utility. Of course in terms of re-usability this simply means that this feature may be largely disabled in this kind of knowledge models. In this chapter the authors face both challenges, i.e. as an excuse for presentation of the most interesting in their opinion trends and works in the field the authors demonstrate the practical approach to modeling copyright law case by re-using statute-specific ontologies.

Review of Moritz Schlick's General Theory of Knowledge

2009 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Steven Gimbel ◽  
Anke Walz ◽  
Hans Reichenbach ◽  
Steven Gimbel ◽  
Anke Walz
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge

Legal Ontologies in ICT and Law

2013 ◽  
pp. 34-49
Author(s):  
Witold Abramowicz ◽  
Piotr Stolarski ◽  
Tadeusz Tomaszewski
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Ontology Engineering ◽  
Knowledge Modeling ◽  
Specialized Knowledge ◽  
General Application ◽  
Knowledge Models ◽  
Usability Issue ◽  
Legal Ontologies

Re-usability is frequently declared as sine qua non feature of modern ontology engineering. Although thoroughly examined in general theory of knowledge management models the re-usability issue is still barely a declaration in the domain of legal ontologies. The similar situation also applies to statute-specific ontologies. Those knowledge modeling entities are well described especially as an opposition to the general application legal ontologies. Yet it is trivial to say that most of the developed legal ontologies so far are those generic ones. And this sole fact should not surprise as the very specialized knowledge models – usually harder to develop – are at the same time narrowed with their utility. Of course in terms of re-usability this simply means that this feature may be largely disabled in this kind of knowledge models. In this chapter we face both challenges, i.e. as an excuse for presentation of the most interesting in our opinion trends and works in the field we will demonstrate the practical approach to modeling copyright law case by re-using statute-specific ontologies.

M. M. Bakhtin’s Hermeneutic Theory

2020 ◽  
pp. 244-263
Author(s):  
Димитрий Барицкий
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Stable Form ◽  
Classical Literature ◽  
Important Place ◽  
In The Beginning

Основная цель, которую ставит перед собор автор статьи, - привлечь внимание к герменевтической теории м. м. Бахтина и указать на её актуальность в рамках такого направления филологического анализа текста, как религиозное литературоведение. в статье в систематическом виде изложены основные положения герменевтической теории учёного. в начале рассматривается общая теория познания м. м. Бахтина, важное место в которой занимают понятия «монологизм» и «диалогизм». После особое внимание направляется на его концепцию структуры содержательной стороны произведения, и здесь изучаются понятия «знак», «значение» и «смысл». отдельно выделяются критерии, которые, по мнению м. м. Бахтина, сообщают смыслу текста стабильную форму, а также приводится критика учёным литературоведческого структурализма. Помимо этого, автор обращает внимание на ту методологию интерпретации произведения, которая складываются на основе предложенной теории текста. в заключение даётся оценка тому эвристическому потенциалу, которым может обладать герменевтическая теория м. м. Бахтина в контексте анализа произведений мировой классической литературы. The main goal of the author of the article is to draw attention to M. M. Bakhtin’s hermeneutic theory and to point out its relevance in the framework of such a direction of philological analysis of the text as «religious literary criticism». The article presents the main terms of the hermeneutical theory of the scientist in a systematic way. In the beginning, we consider the general theory of knowledge of M. M. Bakhtin, an important place in the framework of which is occupied by such concepts as «monologism» and «dialogism». After that, special attention is paid to the scientist’s concept of the structure of the content side of the work, in which such concepts as «sign», «signification» and «meaning» play an important role. The criteria that, according to M. M. Bakhtin, give the meaning of the text a stable form are singled out separately, and academic criticism of literary structuralism is also given. In addition, the author pays attention to the methodology of interpretation of the work, which is formed on the basis of the proposed theory of the text. In conclusion, we assess the heuristic potential that M. M. Bakhtin’s hermeneutical theory can have in the context of analyzing works of world classical literature.

Our Present Outlook in Speculative Philosophy

Philosophy ◽  
1930 ◽  
Vol 5 (17) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
John S. Mackenzie
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Exact Nature ◽  
Speculative Philosophy ◽  
Technical Character ◽  
Mathematical Sciences

Speculative Philosophy, or Pure Metaphysic, stands at the present time in a very interesting position. There is perhaps some degree of slackening in the construction of elaborate systems, though, with the recent examples of McTaggart and Professor Alexander before us, this may be open to some question. But at least we probably realize, more fully than was possible in previous generations, the exact nature of the problems with which pure metaphysic is concerned. Its work has been more and more clearly marked off from that of the empirical sciences (including even the more detailed aspects of psychology), and from that of the mathematical sciences (including even the quasi-mathematical aspects of formal logic); and its province can now be definitely confined to the general theory of knowledge and the light that is thrown by this upon the structure of reality. It is my object in this paper to indicate briefly the chief problems that appear to fall within its scope and the chief directions in which we may look for light upon them. It is well to admit, however, that metaphysical problems are difficult, and that any statements that are made about them, unless expressed in language of a somewhat technical character, are very liable to be misunderstood. I must try to avoid both the Scylla of obscurity and the Charybdis of superficiality.

scholarly journals Galleries and Institutions

1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (191) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Mayoh
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Knowledge Representation ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Program Development ◽  
Semantic Representation ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Unified Theory ◽  
Design Languages ◽  
Logical Programming

<p>This preprint has four parts:</p><ol> <li> Unified theory of knowledge representation (presented at AIMSA 84 conference in Varna). </li><li> Unified theory for modal, dynamic, temporal and process logics (presented at PUC conference in Rio de Janeiro). </li><li> Unified theory for logical programming and semantic representation (presented at Copenhagen workshop). </li><li> Unified theory of languages, models and logics. </li></ol> The ''unified theory'' in the titles of each part refers to the theory of galleries, a development of the theory of institutions. These theories seem to be relevant in many areas of computer science: 1 - 3 are applications to particular areas and papers on: <ul> <li> Processes, event systems, petri nets and other forms of parallelism </li><li>specification, program development and design languages </li></ul> are under preparation.<p>The current status of the general theory is given in part 4, but it is not clear how this theory should be developed further.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document