Periodicity of sunspot group number during the Maunder Minimum

2017 ◽  
Vol 472 (3) ◽  
pp. 2913-2918 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. X. Gao
2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
V. M. S. Carrasco

Abstract Cornelis Tevel made sunspot observations during the period 1816–1836, including the Dalton Minimum. In this work, the first revision of these observations since Wolf incorporated them into his database is presented. On the one hand, the number of individual sunspots from Tevel’s drawings was counted. This is of special interest for the sunspot number reconstruction because this kind of information is not as common in historical sunspot records as the number of groups. Thus, Tevel could be considered for the future reconstruction of the sunspot number index. On the other hand, the number of groups counted according to modern sunspot group classifications finding significant misinterpretations with the number of groups assigned to Tevel in the existing databases. Tevel was a relevant sunspot observer in the Dalton Minimum. In fact, he was the observer with the highest number of groups observed in Solar Cycles 6 and 7 according to the existing sunspot group number databases. According to the raw group number recount in this work, the maximum amplitudes for Solar Cycles 6 and 7 are, respectively, 27% and 7% lower than those previously determined. Moreover, Solar Cycle 6 is the weakest solar cycle since the Maunder Minimum after applying these new counts. Group counts from Tevel’s observations were compared with those from relevant contemporary astronomers, demonstrating that Schwabe and Tevel systematically recorded a higher number of groups than Flaugergues and Derfflinger. In addition, sunspot areas and positions recorded by Tevel should be used with caution for scientific purposes.


Author(s):  
Hisashi Hayakawa ◽  
Tomoya Iju ◽  
Shoma Uneme ◽  
Bruno P Besser ◽  
Shunsuke Kosaka ◽  
...  

Abstract The solar activity during the Maunder Minimum (MM; 1645–1715) has been considered significantly different from the one captured in modern observations, in terms of sunspot group number and sunspot positions, whereas its actual amplitudes and distributions is still under active discussions. In its core period (1650/1660–1700), Martin Fogelius and Henrich Siverus have formed significant long-term series in the existing databases with numerous spotless days, as the 13th and 7th most active observers before the end of the MM. In this study, we have analysed their original archival records, revised their data, have removed significant contaminations of the apparent ‘spotless days’ in the existing databases, and cast caveats on the potential underestimation of the solar-cycle amplitude in the core MM. Still, they reported at best one sunspot group throughout their observational period and confirm the significant suppressed the solar cycles during the MM, which is also supported from the contemporary observations of Hook and Willoughby. Based on the revised data, we have also derived positions of notable sunspot groups, which Siverus recorded in 1671 (≈ N7.5° ± 2.5°), in comparison with those of Cassini's drawings (≈ N10° ± 1°). Their coincidence in position and chronology in corrected dates indicates these sunspot groups were probably the same recurrent active region (AR) and its significantly long lifespan (≥ 35 days) even during the MM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (A30) ◽  
pp. 156-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Clette ◽  
José M. Vaquero ◽  
María Cruz Gallego ◽  
Laure Lefèvre

AbstractDue to its unique 400-year duration, the sunspot number is a central reference for understanding the long-term evolution of solar activity and its influence on the Earth environment and climate. Here, we outline current data recovery work. For the sunspot number, we find historical evidence of a disruption in the source observers occurring in 1947–48. For the sunpot group number, recent data confirm the clear southern predominance of sunspots during the Maunder Minimum, while the umbra-penumbra ratio is similar to other epochs. For the Dalton minimum, newly recovered historical observations confirm a higher activity level than in a true Grand Minimum.


2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (3) ◽  
pp. 3884-3895 ◽  
Author(s):  
V M S Carrasco ◽  
M C Gallego ◽  
J Villalba Álvarez ◽  
J M Vaquero

ABSTRACT A revision is presented of the sunspot observations made by Charles Malapert from 1618 to 1626, studying several documentary sources that include those observations. The revised accounting of the group numbers recorded by Malapert for that period shows new information unavailable in the current sunspot group data base. The average solar activity level calculated from these revised records of Malapert is by almost one-third greater than that calculated from his records included in the current group data base. Comparison of the sunspot observations made by Malapert and by other astronomers of that time with regard to the number of recorded groups and sunspot positions on the solar disc shows good agreement. Malapert reported that he only recorded one sunspot group in each sunspot drawing presented in Austriaca Sidera Heliocyclia (the documentary source that includes most of the sunspot records made by Malapert), although he sometimes observed several groups. Therefore, the sunspot counts obtained in this work on Malapert's sunspot observations represent the lower limit of the solar activity level corresponding to those records.


Solar Physics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 291 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 2653-2684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Svalgaard ◽  
Kenneth H. Schatten
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 496 (2) ◽  
pp. 2482-2492
Author(s):  
V M S Carrasco ◽  
M C Gallego ◽  
J M Vaquero

ABSTRACT We revise the sunspot observations made by Galileo Galilei and Christoph Scheiner in the context of their controversy regarding the nature of sunspots. Those of their sunspot records not included in the current sunspot group database, used as a basis to calculate the sunspot group number, are analysed. Within the documentary sources consulted in this work, we can highlight the sunspot observations by Scheiner included in the letters sent under the pseudonym Apelles to Marcus Welser and the first sunspot observations made by Galileo, which can be consulted in Le opere di Galileo Galilei. These sunspot observations would extend the temporal coverage for these two observers and fill some gaps in the current group database in the earliest period, where the data available are sparse. Moreover, we have detected changes in the quality of the sunspot drawings made by Galileo and Scheiner in their observation series, affecting the number of groups recorded by the two observers. We also compare these records with sunspot observations made by other astronomers of that time. According to this comparison and regarding the same observation days, Scheiner was generally the astronomer who reported more sunspot groups, while Harriot, Cigoli and Galileo recorded a similar number of groups. We conclude that these differences are mainly because of the observational methods used by the observers.


2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 193-196
Author(s):  
V. I. Makarov ◽  
A. G. Tlatov

AbstractA possible scenario of polar magnetic field reversal of the Sun during the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715) is discussed using data of magnetic field reversals of the Sun for 1880–1991 and the14Ccontent variations in the bi-annual rings of the pine-trees in 1600–1730 yrs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document