P0880EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SEVELAMER CARBONATE IN NON-DIALYSIS HYPERPHOSPHATEMIA PATIENTS: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERPHOSPHATEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE NOT ON DIALYSIS IN CHINA

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueqing Yu

Abstract Background and Aims Hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is associated with adverse outcomes, including vascular calcification, increasing risks of disease progression and even death. Sevelamer carbonate have been approved in Europe for phosphate lowering treatment in pre-dialysis CKD patient, its efficacy and safety in Chinese CKD hyperphosphatemia patients are not previously reported. Method This was a phase III, multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, balanced (1:1, sevelamer: placebo) parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sevelamer carbonate versus placebo over 8 weeks’ duration in hyperphosphatemic CKD patients not on dialysis in China (Registration number NCT03001011). The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate efficacy of sevelamer carbonate tablets in the reduction of serum phosphorus in hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. Results In all, 202 patients were randomized (sevelamer, n=101; placebo, n=101); mean age was 50.7 years, 53.5% were male and the mean time of CKD diagnosis was 3.4 years with mean eGFR 7.5 ml/min/1.73 m2. The baseline phosphorous were 2.13±0.35 mmol/L and 2.12±0.37 mmol/L in sevelamer and placebo group, respectively. The mean serum phosphorous decreased significantly in patients treated with sevelamer carbonate (-0.22±0.47 mmol/L) compared with placebo (0.05±0.44 mmol/L) (mean difference between sevelamer carbonate and placebo was -0.26 mmol/L, P<0.0001). When compared with placebo, sevelamer carbonate significantly reduced serum total cholesterol (-0.90±0.85 vs. -0.06±0.68 mmol/L, P<0.0001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.94±0.72 vs. -0.04±0.58 mmol/L, P<0.0001) and calcium-phosphorous product (-0.48±0.97 vs. 0.05±0.81 mmol2/L2) from baseline to week 8. Serum iPTH was not significantly changed in sevelamer carbonate group compared with placebo group (-9.60±136.00 vs. 7.61±141.92 ng/L, P=0.83). Sevelamer carbonate was well tolerated with 83.27% compliance compared with 82.19% compliance in placebo arm. Average dose of sevelamer carbonate was 7.51 g/d at the end of study and 4.52 g/d across the study. Adverse events experienced by patients in sevelamer carbonate and placebo group were similar. Conclusion This study demonstrated that sevelamer carbonate has produced a significant reduction of serum phosphorous, and is safe and tolerated in Chinese pre-dialysis CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia.

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Akizawa ◽  
Iain C. Macdougall ◽  
Jeffrey S. Berns ◽  
Thomas Bernhardt ◽  
Gerald Staedtler ◽  
...  

Background: Molidustat, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The efficacy and safety of molidustat were recently evaluated in three 16-week phase 2b studies. Here, we report the results of two long-term extension studies of molidustat. Methods: Both studies were parallel-group, open-label, multicenter studies of ≤36 months’ duration, in patients with anemia due to CKD, and included an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as active control. One study enrolled patients not receiving dialysis (n = 164), and the other enrolled patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 88). The primary efficacy variable for both studies was change in blood hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline to each post-baseline visit, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs). Results: In patients not on dialysis, the mean ± SD Hb concentrations at baseline were 11.28 ± 0.55 g/dL for molidustat and 11.08 ± 0.51 g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations throughout the study (defined as mean of each patient’s overall study Hb levels) were 11.10 ± 0.508 and 10.98 ± 0.571 g/dL in patients treated with molidustat and darbepoetin, respectively. Similar proportions of patients reported at least one AE in the molidustat (85.6%) and darbepoetin (85.7%) groups. In patients on dialysis, mean ± SD Hb levels at baseline were 10.40 ± 0.70 and 10.52 ± 0.53 g/dL in the molidustat and epoetin groups, respectively. The mean ± SD blood Hb concentrations during the study were 10.37 ± 0.56 g/dL in the molidustat group and 10.52 ± 0.47 g/dL in the epoetin group. Proportions of patients who reported at least one AE were 91.2% in the molidustat group and 93.3% in the epoetin group. Conclusions: Molidustat was well tolerated for up to 36 months and appears to be an effective alternative to darbepoetin and epoetin in the long-term management of anemia associated with CKD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document