The Influence of Sevelamer Hydrochloride and Calcium Carbonate on Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Hemodialysis at Six Months of Follow-Up

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) present alterations in mineral and bone metabolism. Hyperphosphatemia in ESRD is considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), increasing morbidity, and mortality. Sevelamer hydrochloride is a calcium-free, non-absorbable phosphate-chelating polymer. Calcium carbonate chelator is helpful in controlling serum phosphate levels. There is insufficient information on the influence of sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate on the behavior of oxidative stress (OS) markers and inflammation in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A randomized open clinical trial was carried out on patients to evaluate sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate influence at 6 months of study follow-up. Levels of oxidants (LPO, NO, and 8-isoprostanes), antioxidants (SOD and TAC), oxidative DNA damage (8-OHdG and hOGG1), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α), and inflammation markers (ferritin and C-reactive protein) were measured with colorimetric and ELISA methods. We found a significant increase in oxidants LPO and NO, and antioxidants SOD and TAC, and downregulation of IL-6 and TNF-α. Ferritin decrease at 6 months follow-up in the sevelamer hydrochloride group. Increase in C-reactive protein was found in the group of patients treated with calcium carbonate. In conclusion, we found an oxidative state imbalance with increase in LPO and NO oxidants. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes (SOD and TAC) was also found to increase, suggesting a compensatory effect in the face of increase in oxidants. The same phenomenon was observed with increase in the oxidative damage marker to DNA and the increase in the DNA repair enzyme, suggesting a compensatory effect. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were predominantly downregulated by TNF-α in the group that ingested sevelamer hydrochloride in the final determination at 6 months of follow-up. Serum ferritin levels decreased significantly at the end of follow-up in patients on HD in the sevelamer hydrochloride group. The management of hyperphosphatemia with sevelamer hydrochloride appears to have obvious anti-inflammatory and antioxidant benefits.

A comparison between the combined effect of calcium carbonate with sucroferric oxyhydroxide and other phosphate binders: an in vitro and in vivo experimental study

Background Approximately 30% of patients on dialysis received combination therapy for their phosphate binder prescription; however, few studies for combined effects of phosphate binders are reported. For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of combination therapy, we compared the efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21) combined with calcium carbonate with that of lanthanum carbonate hydrate, sevelamer hydrochloride, and ferric citrate hydrate combined with calcium carbonate. Methods For in vitro studies, calcium carbonate and the other phosphate binders alone or in combination were stirred in phosphate solution at pH 2–8 for 2 h. After centrifuging the suspension, the phosphorus level in the supernatant was determined. For in vivo studies, rats were orally administered calcium carbonate and the other phosphate binders (except for sevelamer hydrochloride) alone or in combination, followed by oral administration of phosphate solution adjusted to pH 2 or 7. Serum samples were collected from the rats at predetermined timepoints and the serum phosphorus levels were determined and analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance. Results In the in vitro study, the measured phosphate-binding capacity of combining sevelamer hydrochloride, PA21, and lanthanum carbonate hydrate with calcium carbonate was approximately equal to or greater than the theoretical values under most conditions. Furthermore, these combined effects were insensitive to pH in that order. The measured phosphate-binding capacity of ferric citrate hydrate combined with calcium carbonate was smaller than the theoretical values, and the combination did not exhibit efficacy under any of the tested conditions. In the in vivo study, the combined effect of PA21 and calcium carbonate at both pH values and that of lanthanum carbonate hydrate and calcium carbonate at pH 2 were additive. In contrast, the combined effect of lanthanum carbonate hydrate and calcium carbonate at pH 7 and that of ferric citrate hydrate and calcium carbonate at pH 2 were antagonistic. Conclusions These results suggest that coadministration of PA21 and calcium carbonate showed good and relatively stable efficacy throughout the range of the gastrointestinal pH and that combining lanthanum carbonate hydrate and ferric citrate hydrate with calcium carbonate may not produce the expected efficacy under certain conditions.