EPID-13. PREDICTIVE VALUE OF SERUM PROLACTIN LEVEL TO THE TUMOR SIZE RATIO FOR PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF PROLACTIN-PRODUCING PITUITARY ADENOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi88-vi88
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hwa Kim ◽  
Jung-Won Choi ◽  
Ho-Jun Seol ◽  
Do-Hyun Nam ◽  
Jung-Il Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE Preoperative diagnosis of prolactinomas is critical because medication of dopamine agonists instead of surgical resection has been regarded as a primary treatment. However, serum prolactin level alone is suboptimal for differentiating the prolactin producing adenoma or hyperprolactinemia-causing NFPAs. The author investigated the use of ratio of PRL levels to the tumor size as the optimal cutoff value for prolactin-producing tumor, comparing with the NFPA. METHOD We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent the transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for pituitary lesions in the single institute between January 2015 to May 2020. A total of 223 patients with hyperprolactinemia at the initial diagnosis were analyzed in the study, including NFPA patients (n=175) and prolactinoma patients (n=48). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses were performed for serum prolactin levels (PRL) and serum prolactin levels/tumor maximal diameter (PRL/MD). RESULT Prolactinoma group showed higher median values in serum PRL (258.6 μg/L) and smaller maximal tumor diameter (16.6 mm), compared to those of NFPA group (serum PRL 44.4 μg/L, p-value = 0.002 and MD 23.9 mm, p-value < 0.001). A moderate correlation was found between serum prolactin level and maximal diameters in prolactinomas (r=0.43, p=0.002), whereas a weak relationship was confirmed in NFPAs (r=0.17, p=0.028). The cutoff was 8.93 μg/L*mm (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94) for PRL/MD and 99.43 μg/L for PRL (AUC = 0.91). In prolactinomas, there was no statistical difference between the PRL/MD of macroadenomas (n=36, 21.7μg/L*mm) and microadenoma (n=12, 16.8μg/L*mm) (p=0.109). CONCLUSION The serum PRL levels and tumor size exhibited stronger linear correlation in prolactinomas than in NFPAs. The PRL/MD ratio showed better diagnostic value for differentiating two pathologies than the serum PRL levels alone. These findings suggest PRL/MD ratio may be an alternative method to preoperative diagnosis of prolactinomas differentiating from hyperprolactinemia-causing NFPAs.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Hwa Kim ◽  
Kyu-Yeon Hur ◽  
Sang-Duk Hong ◽  
Jung-won Choi ◽  
Ho-Jun Jun Seol ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTIONPreoperative diagnosis of prolactinomas is critical because dopamine agonists have been regarded as a primary treatment modality. However, serum prolactin level alone is suboptimal for differentiating between prolactinomas and hyperprolactinemia-causing non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). The authors investigated more effective parameter for differentiating prolactinomas and NFPAs by using the adenoma size. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent trans-sphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions in a single institute between January 2015 and May 2021. Using the receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses, we compared performances of serum prolactin levels (PRL), a ratio of serum PRL levels to maximal tumor diameter (MD) (PRL/MD; PDR1), and MD squared (PRL/(MD)2; PDR2) in preoperative diagnosis of prolactinomas. RESULTS 223 patients with NFPAs (n=175) and prolactinomas (n=48) were included in the analysis. The prolactinoma group showed higher serum prolactin (258.6 ㎍/L) and smaller MD (16.6 mm) than those in the NFPA group (44.4 ㎍/L and 23.9 mm; both p-values < 0.001). Among diagnostic parameters, PDR2 exhibited the optimal diagnostic performance with the cutoff value of 0.83 [㎍/L]/mm2 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.945), compared to the PDR1 (8.93 [㎍/L]/mm with AUC 0.938) and PRL (99.4 ㎍/L with AUC 0.910). PDR2 still maintained superior performance in the validation study than PDR1 and PRL (Accuracy of 94.8%, 91.8%, and 75.8%, respectively).CONCLUSIONS PDR2 provided the best performance of three parameters in preoperative discrimination of prolactinomas from NFPAs with hyperprolactinemia, and could contribute to select patients who benefit from medical treatment primarily.


Author(s):  
Pawan Kumar Saini ◽  
Devendra Yadav ◽  
Rozy Badyal ◽  
Suresh Jain ◽  
Arti Singh ◽  
...  

Background: Psoriasis is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the skin mediated by T-lymphocytes resulting in production of cytokines which cause hyperproliferation of keratinocytes.  Several factors and hormones like Prolactin have an action similar to these cytokines in promoting the multiplication of keratinocytes and other cells like lymphocytes and epithelial cells may have a role on the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis. Aim:-The aim of study is to compare the serum Prolactin levels in patients of psoriasis with a control group. Setting and study design: This is a case-control study conducted in the department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy GMC, Kota over a period of 1year from July 2017 to June 2018 Material and method: The study included 100 cases of psoriasis (60 males and 40 females) and 100 controls similar for age and sex. Serum Prolactin levels were measured by ECLIA and results were obtained. Statistical analysis: Mean and standard deviation were calculated for each variable. Statistical significance of the results was analyzed using correlation analysis (Pearson correlation coefficient) and independent samples t-test. Statistical significance was assumed at p value<0.05. Result: Serum Prolactin level was significantly higher in cases of psoriasis compared to controls (p-value <0.001). PASI score and serum Prolactin levels were found to have a positive correlation (r value = 0.337; p-value: 0.001). No significant  correlation was found between serum levels of Prolactin and duration of disease r value= -0.034, P value =0.733). Serum Prolactin level was higher in male patients compared to females patients. Conclusion:- High serum Prolactin may be a biological marker of disease severity in psoriasis and may have a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Further studies with large sample size are required to confirm this hypothesis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 856-861
Author(s):  
Kiyotaka Saito ◽  
Tsuyoshi Fukushima ◽  
Kiyotaka Yokogami ◽  
Hisao Uehara ◽  
Shinji Yamashita ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Burke ◽  
David L. Penn ◽  
Joseph P. Castlen ◽  
Daniel A. Donoho ◽  
Caroline S. Repetti ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEProlactinoma and nonfunctioning adenoma (NFA) are the most common sellar pathologies, and both can present with hyperprolactinemia. There are no definitive studies analyzing the relationship between the sizes of prolactinomas and NFAs and the serum prolactin level. Current guidelines for serum prolactin level cutoffs to distinguish between pathologies are suboptimal because they fail to consider the adenoma volume. In this study, the authors attempted to describe the relationship between serum prolactin level and prolactinoma volume. They also examined the predictive value that can be gained by considering tumor volume in differentiating prolactinoma from NFA and provide cutoff values based on a large sample of patients.METHODSA retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prolactinomas (n = 76) and NFAs (n = 217) was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on adenoma volume, and the two pathologies were compared.RESULTSA strong correlation was found between prolactinoma volume and serum prolactin level (r = 0.831, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between NFA volume and serum prolactin level (r = −0.020, p = 0.773). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of three different adenoma volume groups was performed and resulted in different serum prolactin level cutoffs for each group. For group 1 (≤ 0.5 cm3), the most accurate cutoff was 43.65 μg/L (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.951); for group 2 (> 0.5 to 4 cm3), 60.05 μg/L (AUC = 0.949); and for group 3 (> 4 cm3), 248.15 μg/L (AUC = 1.0).CONCLUSIONSProlactinoma volume has a significant impact on serum prolactin level, whereas NFA volume does not. This finding indicates that the amount of prolactin-producing tissue is a more important factor regarding serum prolactin level than absolute adenoma volume. Hence, volume should be a determining factor to distinguish between prolactinoma and NFA prior to surgery. Current serum prolactin threshold level guidelines are suboptimal and cannot be generalized across all adenoma volumes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-145
Author(s):  
Fawzy M. Khalil ◽  
Mohamed A. Elassal ◽  
Ahmed M. Hussein ◽  
Mahmoud Rizk ◽  
Mohamed A. Awadein ◽  
...  

Reumatismo ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A. Wan Asyraf ◽  
M.S. Mohd Shahrir ◽  
W. Asrul ◽  
A.W. Norasyikin ◽  
O. Hanita ◽  
...  

Based on the recent evidence of association between hyperprolactinemia and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity (SLEDAI), a study was conducted to analyze the association of hyperprolactinemia with lupus nephritis disease activity. In this cross-sectional study, the analysis was conducted on SLE patients who visited the University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) Nephrology Clinic from August 2015 till February 2016. The disease activity was measured using the SLEDAI score, with more than 4 indicating active lupus nephritis. Basal resting prolactin level was analyzed in 43 patients with lupus nephritis, in 27.9% of them had raised serum prolactin. The median of serum prolactin level at 0 minutes was 19.91 ng/mL (IQR: 15.95-22.65 ng/ mL) for active lupus nephritis, which was significantly higher compared to the median of serum prolactin level of 14.34 ng/mL (IQR: 11.09-18.70 ng/mL) for patients in remission (p=0.014). The serum prolactin level positively correlated with SLEDAI (rhos: 0.449, p=0.003) and the UPCI level in lupus nephritis patients (rhos: 0.241, p=0.032). The results were reproduced when the serum prolactin was repeated after 30 minutes. However, the serum prolactin levels at 0 minutes were higher than those taken after 30 minutes (p=0.001). An assessment of serum IL-6 levels found that the active lupus nephritis patients had a higher median level of 65.91 pg/ mL (IQR: 21.96-146.14 pg/mL) compared to the in-remission level of 15.84 pg/mL (IQR: 8.38-92.84 pg/mL), (p=0.039). Further correlation analysis revealed that there was no statistical correlation between the interleukin (IL)-6 levels with serum prolactin, SLEDAI and other lupus nephritis parameters. An ROC curve analysis of serum prolactin at 0 minutes and serum prolactin after 30 minutes and IL-6 levels for prediction of SLE disease activity provided the cutoff value of serum prolactin at 0 minutes, which was 14.63 ng/mL with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 58.1% and AUC of 0.74 (p=0.015). This study concurred with the previous findings that stated that hyperprolactinemia is prevalent in SLE patients and correlated with clinical disease activity and UPCI level. The baseline of the fasting serum prolactin level was found to be a sensitive biomarker for the evaluation of lupus nephritis disease activity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Rupak Chatterjee ◽  
Prantiki Halder ◽  
Sudeshna Mallik ◽  
Bibhuti Saha

Forbes Albright syndrome is a hyperprolactinemia syndrome characterised by galactorrhea and amenorrhea associated with a pituitary tumour. Here we report a case of 30 years female who was admitted with menstrual irregularities for 4 months, galatorrhea and headache with recurrent episodes of loss of consciousness for 3months. Her serum prolactin level was highly raised. MRI brain (plain plus contrast) showed enlarged pituitary gland- pituitary macroadenoma. She was diagnosed as a case of Forbes Albright Syndrome and was treated with Tablet Cabergoline. With the medication, size of her tumour markedly reduced and symptoms resolved as she was followed up after 3 months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document