scholarly journals PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF O-(2-[18F]FLUORETHYL)-L-TYROSINE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (18FET-PET) WITHIN THE CLINICAL COURSE IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 3) ◽  
pp. iii13-iii13 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Tonn ◽  
B. Suchorska ◽  
N. L. Jansen ◽  
J. Linn ◽  
H. Kretzschmar ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl 5) ◽  
pp. v161.2-v161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidsel Højklint Poulsen ◽  
Thomas Urup ◽  
Kirsten Grunnet ◽  
Vibeke Andrée Larsen ◽  
Per Munck af Rosenschöld ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1878-1878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Abe ◽  
Kentaro Narita ◽  
Hiroki Kobayashi ◽  
Akihiro Kitadate ◽  
Masami Takeuchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a valuable tool in the initial evaluation of myeloma and related disorders. However, the prognostic value of PET-CT has not been fully elucidated. We recently reported the prognostic significance of medullary abnormalities in the appendicular skeleton (AS) detected by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) [Blood Adv, 2018. 2(9): p.1032-39].The study reported that medullary abnormalities in AS detected by MDCT showed different fluourodeoxyglucose-avidity ranging from entirely negative to diffusely positive on concurrently performed PET-CT, despite the presence of unequivocal infiltration of abnormal lesions in AS on MDCT. We further investigate the prognostic relevance of medullary abnormalities in AS by PET-CT in symptomatic MM. Methods: We identified a total of 211 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM diagnosed and treated between April 2008 and February 2018 at Kameda Medical Center, Kamogowa-shi, Japan. They were evaluated with pretreatment whole-body PET-CT. We included only patients who had been treated with novel agents. PET-CT imaging was performed as previously reported [Blood, 2011. 118(23): p.5989-95]. PET-CT positivity and negativity were also defined as previously described. Results: Median age of the patients was 73.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 66.3-80.3 years). There were 129 (61.1%) patients who showed abnormal findings on PET-CT. Consistent with previous reports, known high-risk PET-CT findings including the presence of >3 systemic focal lesions (FLs), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) >4.2, and extramedullary disease were observed in 91 (43.1%), 97 (46.0%), and 11 (5.2%) patients, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the optimal cutoff value of AS focal lesions (AS-FLs) on PET-CT as 3. We then divided patients into two groups with ≤3 or >3 AS-FLs (Fig. 1). There were 35 (16.6%) patients with >3 AS-FLs, and their levels of clonal circulating plasma cells and prevalence of del(17p) and t(14;16) were higher than those in patients without AS-FLs. Patients with >3 AS-FLs showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without [median PFS: 12.8 and 35.6 months, respectively; P < 0.001, and median OS: 33.4 months and not reached (NR), respectively; P < 0.001]. Patients with 1-3 AS-FLs did not show significant differences in PFS and OS compared to patients with no AS-FL (Fig. 2). In addition, this finding retained its prognostic value for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR); 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.42-3.88; P < 0.001 for PFS, and HR; 2.86, 95% CI; 1.60-5.09; P < 0.001 for OS] (Table 1). As previously described, we observed that the known high-risk PET findings including the presence of >3 systemic FLs and SUVmax> 4.2 had an unfavorable prognostic impact. Patients with >3 AS-FLs showed significantly shorter PFS and OS than those without, even among patients with >3 systemic FLs (Fig. 3) or SUVmax> 4.2 (Fig. 4). Furthermore, we identified 108 and 42 patients with focal/scattered and diffuse marrow pattern on MDCT, respectively. There were 16 (14.8%) and 19 (45.2%) patients with >3 AS-FLs observed on PET-CT with focal/scattered and diffuse marrow pattern on MDCT, respectively. These patients showed shorter PFS and OS than those without AS-FLs among patients with the same AS marrow pattern on MDCT. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to demonstrate that the presence of >3 FLs in AS detected by pretreatment PET-CT was robustly predictive of unfavorable survival independent of known risk factors, including existing high-risk PET-CT findings in patients with newly diagnosed MM. The findings in AS may potentially complement and improve the prognostic performance of PET-CT. Further systematic studies are warranted for the validation of our results and development of more accurate prognostic systems incorporating cross-sectional imaging. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001648
Author(s):  
Senthil Selvaraj ◽  
Muhammad Shoaib Khan ◽  
Mahesh K Vidula ◽  
Philip C Wiener ◽  
Alejandro E de Feria ◽  
...  

ObjectiveVisually estimated coronary artery calcium (VECAC) from chest CT or attenuation correction (AC)/CT obtained during positron emission tomography (PET)–myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is feasible. Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of VECAC beyond conventional risk factors and PET imaging parameters, including coronary flow reserve (CFR).MethodsWe analysed 608 patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent PET–MPI between 2012 and 2016 and had AC/CT and/or chest CT images. We used Cox regression to estimate the association of VECAC categories (≤10, 11–400, >400 Agatston units (AU)) with the primary outcome of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome or stroke (mean follow-up 4.3±1.8 years). C-statistics assessed the relationship between PET parameters and VECAC with the primary outcome.ResultsMean age was 58±11 years, 65% were women and 67% were black. VECAC ≤10, 11–400 and >400 AU was observed in 68%, 12% and 20% of subjects, respectively. Compared with VECAC ≤10, VECAC categories 11–400 (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.08) and >400 AU (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.87 to 4.98) were associated with the primary outcome after adjusting for traditional risk factors, MPI findings and CFR. Adding VECAC to a model that included PET–MPI, CFR and clinical risk factors improved the prognostic value for the primary outcomes (c-statistic 0.71 to 0.75 with VECAC, p=0.01).ConclusionsVECAC is a potent predictor of events beyond traditional risk factors and PET imaging markers, including CFR. These data further support the importance for routine VECAC implementation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document