scholarly journals 320 Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Lumbar Fusion: A Comparative Single Institution Experience

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
G. Damian Brusko ◽  
Karthik Madhavan ◽  
Richard Epstein ◽  
John Paul G Kolcun ◽  
Jay Grossman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Geng ◽  
Hui Bi ◽  
Dai Zhang ◽  
Changji Xiao ◽  
Han Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our objective was to evaluate the impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods One hundred forty female patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive either multimodal analgesia (Study group) or conventional opioid-based analgesia (Control group). The multimodal analgesic protocol consists of pre-operative acetaminophen and gabapentin, intra-operative flurbiprofen and ropivacaine, and post-operative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Both groups received an on-demand mode patient-controlled analgesia pump containing morphine for rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 score at postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scores (NRS), opioid consumption, clinical recovery, C-reactive protein, and adverse events. Results One hundred thirty-eight patients completed the study. The global QoR-40 scores at POD 2 were not significantly different between groups, although scores in the pain dimension were higher in Study group (32.1 ± 3.0 vs. 31.0 ± 3.2, P = 0.033). In the Study group, NRS pain scores, morphine consumption, and rescue analgesics in PACU (5.8% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.0006) were lower, time to ambulation [5.0 (3.3–7.0) h vs. 6.5 (5.0–14.8) h; P = 0.003] and time to bowel function recovery [14.5 (9.5–19.5) h vs.17 (13–23.5) h; P = 0.008] were shorter, C-reactive protein values at POD 2 was lower [4(3–6) ng/ml vs. 5 (3–10.5) ng/ml; P = 0.022] and patient satisfaction was higher (9.8 ± 0.5 vs. 8.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.000). Conclusion For minimally invasive laparoscopic gynecological surgery, multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol offered better pain relief, lower opioid use, earlier ambulation, faster bowel function recovery and higher patient satisfaction, while no improvement in QoR-40 score was found. Trial registration ChiCTR1900026194; Date registered: Sep 26,2019.


Esophagus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Tanishima ◽  
Katsunori Nishikawa ◽  
Masami Yuda ◽  
Yoshitaka Ishikawa ◽  
Keita Takahashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2716
Author(s):  
So-Jeong Yoon ◽  
So-Kyung Yoon ◽  
Ji-Hye Jung ◽  
In-Woong Han ◽  
Dong-Wook Choi ◽  
...  

The latest guidelines from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society stated that early drain removal after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is beneficial in decreasing complications including postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs). This study aimed to ascertain the actual benefits of early drain removal after PD. The data of 450 patients who underwent PD between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical outcomes were compared between patients whose drains were removed within 3 postoperative days (early removal group) and after 5 days (late removal group). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for clinically relevant POPFs (CR-POPFs). Among the patients with drain fluid amylase < 5000 IU on the first postoperative day, the early removal group had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than the late removal group (30.9% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001; 9.8 vs. 12.5 days, p = 0.030, respectively). The incidences of specific complications including CR-POPFs were comparable between the two groups. Risk factor analysis showed that early drain removal did not increase CR-POPFs (p = 0.163). Although early drain removal has not been identified as apparently beneficial, this study showed that it may contribute to an early return to normal life without increasing complications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 2914-2922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Stearns ◽  
Margaret A. Plymale ◽  
Daniel L. Davenport ◽  
Crystal Totten ◽  
Samuel P. Carmichael ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Stevie-Jay Stapler ◽  
Kara K. Brockhaus ◽  
Michael A Battaglia ◽  
Stephen T. Mahoney ◽  
Amanda M. McClure ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark V. Koning ◽  
Aart Jan W. Teunissen ◽  
Erwin van der Harst ◽  
Elisabeth J. Ruijgrok ◽  
Robert Jan Stolker

2021 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Santino Cua ◽  
Michelle Humeidan ◽  
Eliza W. Beal ◽  
Stacy Brethauer ◽  
Valerie Pervo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Radhika Jaiswal ◽  
Marc Greenwald ◽  
Aditya Bissoonauth ◽  
Sally Kaplan ◽  
Meng Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document