scholarly journals Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome With Failed High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Salvaged With Arthrodesis Revision Surgery and Burst Therapy

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin McCormack ◽  
Mansour H Mathkour ◽  
Lora Wallis Kahn ◽  
Maged Guirguis ◽  
Gassan Chaiban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Foot Pain ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract INTRODUCTION Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling form of constant and intense chronic pain involving a limb. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is chronic back pain following back surgery. Burst stimulation is a novel concept applied recently to treat chronic pain through spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The impulses are thought to travel to the thalamus to treat sensory, affective, and attentional components of neuropathic pain by targeting both the somatosensory cortex and the limbic system. METHODS A 50-yr-old female presented 1 yr after L5-S1 posterior instrumentation and posterolateral arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis with disabling Type I CRPS of her left foot and back pain. Postoperative improvement in back pain was noted but her left leg pain became worse despite SCS reprogramming. Two months later, she underwent placement of a different paddle lead at T12 and a new pulse generator using burst therapy. This resulted in complete resolution of foot pain. She remains pain-free 5 mo postoperatively. RESULTS Our patient underwent a T9-T10 high frequency (10 kHz) SCS trial followed by permanent paddle lead placement at T9-10 which provided more than 50% foot pain relief resulting in improved range of motion. However, worsening back pain and pseudoarthrosis mandated a revision of her prior arthrodesis 6 mo after SCS surgery. CONCLUSION In selected patients with FBSS and CRPS, revision of arthrodesis combined with SCS may be needed to achieve adequate pain relief. Burst therapy may be superior to high frequency stimulation in select patients.

Efficacy of Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulator for the Relief of Chronic Low Back Pain from Failed Back Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 3;11 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
Asokumar Buvanendran
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Stimulation Of

Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common clinical entity for which spinal cord stimulation has been found to be an effective mode of analgesia, but with variable success rates. Objective: To determine if focal stimulation of the dorsal columns with a transverse tripolar lead might achieve deeper penetration of the electrical stimulus into the spinal cord and therefore provide greater analgesia to the back. Design: Case report. Methods: We describe a 42-year-old female with failed back surgery syndrome that had greater back pain than leg pain. The tripolar lead configuration was achieved by placing percutaneously an octapolar lead in the spinal midline followed by 2 adjacent quadripolar leads, advanced to the T7-T10 vertebral bodies. Results: Tripolar stimulation pattern resulted in more than 70% pain relief in this patient during the screening trial, while stimulation of one or 2 electrodes only provided 20% pain relief. After implantation of a permanent tripolar electrode system with a single rechargeable battery, the pain relief was maintained for one year. Conclusion: This is case report describing a case of a patient with chronic low back pain with a diagnosis of failed back surgery syndrome in which transverse tripolar stimulation using an octapolar and 2 quadripolar leads appeared to be beneficial. The transverse tripolar system consists of a central cathode surrounded by anodes, using 3 leads. This arrangement may contribute to maximum dorsal column stimulation with minimal dorsal root stimulation and provide analgesia to the lower back. Key words: Epidural, low back pain, spinal cord stimulation, failed back surgery syndrome, tripolar stimulation

scholarly journals Wireless High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation (10 kHz) Compared with Multiwaveform Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Subjects: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1971-1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Bolash ◽  
Michael Creamer ◽  
Richard Rauck ◽  
Payam Vahedifar ◽  
Aaron Calodney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Trial Period ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the wireless Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulator (WSCS) System for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refractory to standard medical treatment utilizing 10-kHz stimulation (high-frequency [HF]) in comparison with 10–1,500-Hz stimulation (low-frequency [LF]) waveforms. Methods Ninety-nine subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HF or LF stimulation waveforms utilizing the same Freedom WSCS System. All subjects were implanted with two 8-electrode arrays in the exact same anatomical positions within the dorsal epidural spinal column, with the top electrode positioned at the T8 and T9 vertebrae levels, respectively, and the wireless receiver placed under the skin in a subcutaneous pocket. Results Seventy-two (HF: N = 38; LF: N = 34) subjects had completed the six-month follow-up after an initial 30-day trial period at the time of this report. For both the HF and LF arms, mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain decreased significantly: 77% and 76%, respectively, for the HF arm and 64% and 64%, respectively, for the LF arm. In addition, most subjects experienced significant improvements in VAS, Oswestry Disability Index, European Quality of Life 5 Dimension questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Change, and sleep duration. Conclusions These preliminary results demonstrate that WSCS devices can reduce FBSS chronic pain substantially with both LF and HF stimulation waveforms over a seven-month period (30-day trial period and six-month post-trial evaluation).

scholarly journals High-frequency spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant low back pain—single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Motov ◽  
Kaywan Aftahy ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Jörger ◽  
Arthur Wagner ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

AbstractTreatment of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with predominant low back pain (LBP) remains challenging. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF10 SCS) is believed to achieve significant pain reduction. We aimed to evaluate the real-life efficacy of HF-10 SCS in a tertiary spine center. A prospective observational study of all patients with FBSS and predominant LBP who underwent HF-10 SCS surgery was performed between 2016 and 2018. Patients > 18 years with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of ≥ 5 for LBP and pain duration > 6 months under stable medication were implanted percutaneous under general anesthesia and a trial phase of 7–14 days was accomplished. Primary end point was a successful trial defined as ≥ 50% VAS score reduction for LBP. Thirty-four of 39 (85%) subjects had a successful trial. Fifty-three percent were female and the mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up lasted for 10 months. Devices were removed after a median of 10 months in 5 cases. Remaining 29 patients stated significant VAS score reduction for LBP from 8.1 to 2.9 and VAS for leg pain from 4.9 to 2.2. Twenty-four percent of all patients were able to discontinue their opioids. Eight of 9 patients (89%) with signs of adjacent disc disease and 7 of 10 (70%) patients with hardware failure were successfully implanted with significant VAS reduction for LBP. HF-10 SCS achieves significant pain reduction in most patients with FBSS and predominant LBP. It might be an efficient alternative to revision surgery.

Back Pain: A Real Target for Spinal Cord Stimulation?

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Alexandre Delmotte ◽  
Samuel D'Houtaud ◽  
Lorraine Misbert ◽  
Bakari Diallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Pain Visual Analog Scale

Abstract Background: Failed back surgery syndrome represents one of the most frequent etiologies of chronic back pain and is a major public health issue. Neurostimulation has currently not been validated in the treatment of back pain because of technological limitations in implantable spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems. New-generation leads using several columns of stimulation can generate longitudinal and/or transverse stimulation fields into the spinal cord. Objective: To investigate, through extensive stimulation testing, the capacity of multicolumn tripolar leads to achieve back territory paresthesia coverage in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients. Methods: Eleven patients implanted with a 16-contact spinal cord stimulation lead (Specify 5-6-5, Medtronic Inc) were assessed with a systematic exploration of 43 selected stimulation configurations to generate bilateral back paresthesia in addition to leg territory coverage. Results: The tripolar lead successfully generated paresthesia in both bilateral back and leg territories in 9 patients (81.8%). Success rates of multicolumn stimulation patterns were significantly higher than for longitudinal configurations for lombodorsal paresthesia coverage. Six months after implantation, significant pain relief was obtained compared with preoperative evaluation for global pain (Visual Analog Scale, 2.25 vs 8.2 preoperatively; P < .05), leg pain (Visual Analog Scale, 0.5 vs 7.6 preoperatively; P < .05), and back pain (Visual Analog Scale, 1.5 vs 7.8 preoperatively; P < .05). Conclusion: These results suggest that multicolumn leads can reliably generate back pain coverage and favor pain relief outcomes. This may lead physicians to reconsider new indications for spinal cord stimulation. Expanding neurostimulation perspectives to intractable back pain syndromes could become realistic in the near future.

scholarly journals Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: a proposal for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and ICD-11

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Christelis ◽  
Brian Simpson ◽  
Marc Russo ◽  
Michael Stanton-Hicks ◽  
Giancarlo Barolat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Medical Professionals ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Spinal Pain Syndrome

Abstract Objective For many medical professionals dealing with patients with persistent pain following spine surgery, the term failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) as a diagnostic label is inadequate, misleading and potentially troublesome. It misrepresents causation. Alternative terms have been suggested but none has replaced FBSS. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published a revised classification of chronic pain, as part of the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which has been accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO). This includes the term Chronic pain after spinal surgery (CPSS), which is suggested as a replacement for FBSS. Methods This article provides arguments and rationale for a replacement definition. In order to propose a broadly applicable yet more precise and clinically informative term, an international group of experts was established. Results 14 candidate replacement terms were considered and ranked. The application of agreed criteria reduced this to a shortlist of four. A preferred option – Persistent spinal pain syndrome – was selected by a structured workshop and Delphi process. We provide rationale for using Persistent spinal pain syndrome and a schema for its incorporation into ICD-11. We propose the adoption of this term would strengthen the new ICD-11 classification. Conclusions This project is important to those in the fields of pain management, spine surgery and neuromodulation, as well as patients labelled with FBSS. Through a shift in perspective it could facilitate the application of the new ICD-11 classification and allow clearer discussion amongst medical professionals, industry, funding organisations, academia, and the legal profession.

scholarly journals High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at T9/10 in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Higashiyama ◽  
Takuro Endo ◽  
Taku Sugawara
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option for low back pain and radicular leg pain of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). In a recent study, high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HFSCS) was found to be more effective in treating chronic pain than traditional paresthesia-based low-frequency SCS (paresthesia SCS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of paresthesia SCS and HFSCS in improving outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent paresthesia SCS or HFSCS between September 2016 and January 2019. Paresthesia SCS is generally characterized by programming stimulation parameters such that the patient experiences paresthesia, and the paresthesia topography overlaps the pain topography as much as possible. The patient in HFSCS had a placement of cylindrical lead at levels T9-10. Patients were programmed with the electrode overlying the inferior endplate of T9 (+) and the electrode overlying the superior endplate of T10 (–). RESULTS A total of 14 patients (4 males, 10 females) underwent paresthesia SCS implantation. Mean age was 77.2 ± 9.6 yr. A total of 5 patients (2 males, 3 females) underwent HFSCS implantation. Mean age was 78.2 ± 7.5 yr. Operative time was shorter for the HFSCS group compared to the paresthesia SCS group (53.4 ± 4.8 min vs 82.9 ± 20.3 min, respectively; P < .001). A total of 5 out of 5 patients in the HFSCS group (100%) and 10 out of 14 patients in the paresthesia SCS group (71.4%) achieved the outcome of 50% pain relief (P = .25) CONCLUSION To confirm paresthesia during the procedure in the elderly may be complicated by hearing/language difficulties or by sedative-related confusion. Compared to paresthesia SCS, HFSCS allows for lower operative times and a more efficient and accurate positioning of the electrodes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document