scholarly journals PEDT-9 A study of NovoTTF-100A to expand the regulatory indication for childhood glioblastoma through a pediatric clinical trial based on the Advanced Medical Care system

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi11-vi11
Author(s):  
Yuki Yuza ◽  
Ryo Nishikawa ◽  
Keita Terashima ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujisaki ◽  
Jun Kurihara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Tumor-treating fields (TTF) are alternating electric fields applied continuously to the brain by attaching 2-pair arrays on the scalp. Although TTF therapy has demonstrated efficacy against supratentorial glioblastoma (GBM) in adults, its safety and efficacy in children have not been confirmed. In Japan, off-label use of medical devices is almost impossible because the national health insurance system does not cover the cost of off-label use of drugs and medical devices. Therefore, TTF therapy cannot be applied to the treatment of pediatric GBM. [Objectives] The investigator-initiated clinical trial aims to expand regulatory approval of TTF therapy for pediatric GBM treatment based on safety and exploratory efficacy data. Methods: Patients aging between 5 and 17 years with histopathological diagnosis of GBM (either newly diagnosed or first-recurrence), which located in the supratentorial region would be included. All the patients will receive TTF therapy for 28 days per course for up to 26 courses until the end-of-therapy criteria are met. The primary endpoint is the adverse event rate with causality. The secondary endpoints include various time-to-event measures and QoL. In total ten patients will be enrolled. Current Status: Discussions with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) led to a tentative consensus that the accumulated data on the efficacy of NovoTTF-100A for adult GBM may be extrapolatable to pediatric GBM if the trial is able to demonstrate efficacy equivalent to that found in previous, adult studies. On the other hand, the combination of the pediatric safety data gathered in this trial and the findings of international studies, including clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance studies, may expedite approval of the device for pediatric GBM treatment. The trial started patient enrollment in April, 2021 with the supervision of the Advanced Medical Care administration system and is currently awaiting the first eligible patient.

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-757
Author(s):  
Ionut Vida Simiti

Breaking the limits of the risks for the human body, health or even the life of the patient, as assumed by the pharmaceutical producers, by using a drug off label, for its side effects, in another purpose or even against the purpose for which the drug was authorized by the National Agency of Medicine and Medical Devices, is not in itself illegal if the off label use has the common consent of both the doctor and the patient for a treatment and only for a treatment which, although a spread procedure, has little or no scientific support. But if the patient is subjected to unreasonable risks, endangering his body, health or life beyond the possible benefits of the treatment, without being informed about the lack of scientific support, the doctor is liable not only for malpractice (civil medical liability) but also for a criminal offence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8507-8507
Author(s):  
Dean Anthony Fennell ◽  
Angela Claire Casbard ◽  
Catharine Porter ◽  
Robin Rudd ◽  
Jason Francis Lester ◽  
...  

8507 Background: All patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) eventually relapse following standard chemotherapy. However, there is no standard treatment option in this setting. Vinorelbine, exhibits useful clinical activity but has not been formally evaluated in a randomised clinical trial, despite its widespread off-label use worldwide. BRCA1 regulates spindle assembly checkpoint in MPM and predicts vinorelbine sensitivity in preclinical models [1,2], suggesting that BRCA1 negative patients may be chemoresistant. Methods: VIM, a Cancer Research UK funded, investigator-initiated randomised controlled phase 2 multi-centre UK trial, enrolled patients with MPM who had progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Pts were randomised 2:1 to either vinorelbine (60mg/m2 weekly Q21d escalating to 80mg/m2 from cycle 2) + active supportive care (ASC) versus ASC until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS) defined as the time from randomisation to any progression (based on Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma) or death. The trial had 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.65 at the one-sided 20% significance level. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), tolerability and safety. Results: Between May 2016 and Oct 2018, 154 patients were recruited from 10 UK sites and randomised to vinorelbine + ASC (n=98) or ASC alone (n=56). In the Intention-to-treat analysis, after 129 events, median PFS was 4.2 months (m) for vinorelbine + ASC compared to 2.8m for ASC alone (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.85; one-sided p = 0.0017). 108 deaths were reported. Median OS was 9.3m for vinorelbine + ASC compared to 9.1m for ASC alone (HR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.17; two-sided p = 0.24). Toxicity data and subgroup analyses including the impact of BRCA1 deficiency will be presented. Conclusion: The trial met its primary endpoint. Vinorelbine demonstrates useful clinical efficacy in relapsed MPM, supporting its off-label use, as a treatment option for patients with relapsed MPM.[1] Busacca et al, J Pathol 2012, 227(2), 200. [2] Busacca et al, Mol Cancer Res, 2021, 20(2) 379. Clinical trial information: NCT02139904.


1999 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Smith ◽  
L Berlin

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. e20163439 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document