183. Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections at a Large Academic Medical Center
Abstract Background Left ventricular assist device infections (LVADIs) contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality. The lack of evidenced-based treatment recommendations results in substantial variability in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management of LVADIs at our institution to better assess practice patterns and standardize treatment decisions. Methods This was a retrospective study including adults diagnosed with an initial LVADI from January 1, 2013 to July 1, 2019. Exclusion criteria included concomitant non-LVADI, patients with other mechanical circulatory systems, or pregnancy. Pertinent patient, LVAD, infection, management, and clinical outcome data was collected and described with descriptive statistics. Results A total of 49 patients were included, 37 of which had at least one recurrence, resulting in 57 recurrent and 106 total LVADIs. The majority of LVADIs were driveline infections (DLIs) (92%). There was an increase in the incidence of deep DLIs (35% vs. 10%) and bloodstream infections (26% vs. 4%) amongst recurrent vs. initial LVADIs. Staphylococcus aureus (51%) and nosocomial gram-negatives (20%) were the most common causative pathogens. Surgical interventions were common (55%). LVADIs treated predominately with oral antibiotics (54%) or IV antibiotics (46%) received a median duration of therapy of 31 and 35 days, respectively. Antibiotic regimens included anti-methicillin-resistant S.aureus coverage and anti-pseudomonal coverage in 49% and 22% of total cases, respectively. Suppressive antibiotics were commonly prescribed (54%). LVADI-related readmission (69%) and recurrence (76%) within one year of initial LVADI was frequent. Recurrent LVADI occurred regardless of receiving suppressive therapy in 60% of total recurrent cases. Conclusion This study offers unique insight into initial vs. recurrent LVADIs as well as infection characteristics and clinical outcomes at a large academic medical center. Future studies with additional focus on risk factors for recurrence would be beneficial for drawing conclusions on the efficacy of current practices and shaping future treatment guidelines. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures