scholarly journals Prospective, Open-label Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Recurrent C. difficile Infection

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S383-S384
Author(s):  
Peyman Goldeh ◽  
Peter Kim ◽  
Salaheddin Abouanaser ◽  
Eric Partlow ◽  
Patricia Beckett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Retention Enema ◽  
Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Laboratory Facility ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown to be effective for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). However, significant laboratory costs for donor screening and a lack of suitable donors and laboratory facility have restricted the availability of the treatment. In order to expand access to FMT, we have investigated the efficacy of lyophilized FMT, comparing it to the published historical efficacy of frozen FMT in preventing further episodes of CDI in patients with a history of rCDI. This study was designed to be open-labeled to expedite and minimize costs associated with conducting a two-armed randomized controlled trial, given that the efficacy of frozen FMT is known to be 85%. Additionally, using lyophilized FMT offers two major advantages: 1) its prolonged shelf life reduces cost because fewer donors need to be screened; and 2) it can be transported without freezing. Methods This is an open-labeled, prospective study involving 50 patients with a history of 2 or more rCDI who have failed at least 1 course of tapered vancomycin therapy. Eligible patients received 2 lyophilized FMT via retention enema within 8 days of each treatment and were followed for 13 weeks post last FMT to determine efficacy and safety of FMT. Results The efficacy of lyophilized FMTs in preventing further episodes of CDI in patients with rCDI was 80%. The adverse events associated with lyophilized FMT were similar to frozen FMT. Conclusion Lyophilized FMT in treating rCDI showed similar efficacy and safety to frozen FMT. Lyophilized FMT appears to be promising in preventing further episode of CDI and increasing accessibility for patients with rCDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Daily 800 mg versus 600 mg Efavirenz for HIV Patients Treating Tuberculosis with a Rifampicin-Based Regimen: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mariana S. Xavier ◽  
Anete Trajman ◽  
Carolina A. S. Schmaltz ◽  
Flavia M. Sant’anna ◽  
Ivan R. Maia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Undetectable Viral Load ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Transient Events

Objectives. Pharmacokinetics studies recommend increasing efavirenz dosage in tuberculosis/HIV patients using rifampicin. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of 600 versus 800 mg of efavirenz in tuberculosis/HIV patients using rifampicin. Design. We conducted an open label, multicentre, randomized trial from 2006 to 2012. The primary outcome was the proportion of undetectable viral load (HIV-VL) within six months. Secondary outcomes were time to achieve primary endpoint, trajectories of HIV-VL, proportion of any adverse events (AE), proportion of severe and serious AE (SSAE), and time to treatment interruption due to SSAE. Methods. Efavirenz-naïve patients were randomized 30 days after rifampicin-containing regimens initiation to receive 600 (comparison arm) or 800 mg (intervention arm) efavirenz-based regimens and followed-up for 180 days. Results. Sixty-five and 67 participants were respectively included in the comparison and intervention arms with 64.6% (52.5%-65.1%) and 62.7% (50.7%-73.3%) attaining undetectable HIV-VL in six months. Median time to attain undetectable HIV-VL was 70 days in both arms, with HIV-VL overlapping trajectories during follow-up. Cough, acne, and dizziness were more frequent in the intervention arm. SSAE were observed in 19.1% (13.8%-25.8%) and 25.0% (18.9%-33.2%), respectively. Survival curves up to the first SSAE-attributed treatment interruption were similar. None of the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion. Efficacy of efavirenz was similar regardless of dosage. Differences regarding safety occurred as mild and transient events, which did not interfere with treatment. Similar efficacy and safety (SSAE) and lower tolerance (minor AE) in the intervention group favour the use of 600 mg efavirenz in patients using rifampicin.

scholarly journals Oral Vancomycin Followed by Fecal Transplantation Versus Tapering Oral Vancomycin Treatment for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susy S Hota ◽  
Valerie Sales ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Mary Jane Salpeter ◽  
Allison McGeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Fecal Transplantation ◽  
Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Microbiota Analysis ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

Abstract Background Fecal transplantation (FT) is a promising treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but its true effectiveness remains unknown. We compared 14 days of oral vancomycin followed by a single FT by enema with oral vancomycin taper (standard of care) in adult patients experiencing acute recurrence of CDI. Methods In a phase 2/3, single-center, open-label trial, participants from Ontario, Canada, experiencing recurrence of CDI were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 14 days of oral vancomycin treatment followed by a single 500-mL FT by enema, or a 6-week taper of oral vancomycin. Patients with significant immunocompromise, history of fulminant CDI, or irreversible bleeding disorders were excluded. The primary endpoint was CDI recurrence within 120 days. Microbiota analysis was performed on fecal filtrate from donors and stool samples from FT recipients, as available. Results The study was terminated at the interim analysis after randomizing 30 patients. Nine of 16 (56.2%) patients who received FT and 5 of 12 (41.7%) in the vancomycin taper group experienced recurrence of CDI, corresponding with symptom resolution in 43.8% and 58.3%, respectively. Fecal microbiota analysis of 3 successful FT recipients demonstrated increased diversity. A futility analysis did not support continuing the study. Adverse events were similar in both groups and uncommon. Conclusions In patients experiencing an acute episode of recurrent CDI, a single FT by enema was not significantly different from oral vancomycin taper in reducing recurrent CDI. Further research is needed to explore optimal donor selection, FT preparation, route, timing, and number of administrations. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01226992.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document