scholarly journals 2541. Impact of a Combined Infectious Disease-Critical Care Medicine (ID-CCM) Track on Fellowship Recruitment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S883-S883
Author(s):  
Nitin Bhanot ◽  
Zaw Min ◽  
Matthew Moffa ◽  
Thomas L Walsh ◽  
James D Como
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Collaborative Effort ◽  
Fellowship Program ◽  
Fully Integrated ◽  
Increasing Trend ◽  
Fellowship Programs ◽  
Allegheny General Hospital

Abstract Background There has been a declining national trend in recent years of resident applications to Infectious Disease (ID) fellowship programs. This dearth of interested and available applicants has resulted in many programs failing to fill some or all of their fellowship slots. Our ID fellowship program, founded in 2013 at Allegheny General Hospital, had met with similar difficulty. Methods To increase the recruitment pool of candidates and combat the challenge to fill our positions, we incorporated a combined 3 year ID-Critical Care Medicine (CCM) track in 2016, initially with one of our two annual fellowship slots allotted to this track. This entailed a collaborative effort between the ID and CCM divisions, an internal application completion outlining the need and rationale for this combined program, and finally, approval from the institutional as well as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Results The number of applicants interviewed from 2013 to 2016 for ID (pre-inception of the ID-CCM track), as well as those for ID, ID-CCM, or those interviewing for both tracks following 2016, were counted. We noted a consistent increasing trend in the numbers interviewed for both the ID (4, 8, and 12 total applicants) and ID-CCM (4, 10, and 12 total applicants) tracks over the three since the inception of our combined fellowship program; 3 additional applicants in years 2017 and 2018, and 5 in 2019, expressed interest in either ID or ID-CCM (Graph 1). This favorably amounted to filling our training positions. Conclusion Implementation of a combined ID-CCM fellowship program proved to be a viable strategy to increase the number of applicants at our institution. Given the success of having one dually-accredited slot, we have expanded the combined-track to both positions. As the first fully-integrated ID-CCM fellowship program in the country, we may be pioneering this novel training pathway for future physicians. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Adult and Pediatric Fellowship Programs in Critical Care Medicine

1980 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 693-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
DENNIS M. GREENBAUM ◽  
PETER R. HOLBROOK
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Fellowship Programs

scholarly journals Mechanical Ventilation Training During Graduate Medical Education: Perspectives and Review of the Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Keller ◽  
Dru Claar ◽  
Juliana Carvalho Ferreira ◽  
David C. Chu ◽  
Tanzib Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Graduate Medical

ABSTRACT Background Management of mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important and complex aspect of caring for critically ill patients. Management strategies and technical operation of the ventilator are key skills for physicians in training, as lack of expertise can lead to substantial patient harm. Objective We performed a narrative review of the literature describing MV education in graduate medical education (GME) and identified best practices for training and assessment methods. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar for English-language, peer-reviewed articles describing MV education and assessment. We included articles from 2000 through July 2018 pertaining to MV education or training in GME. Results Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. Studies related to MV training in anesthesiology, emergency medicine, general surgery, and internal medicine residency programs, as well as subspecialty training in critical care medicine, pediatric critical care medicine, and pulmonary and critical care medicine. Nearly half of trainees assessed were dissatisfied with their MV education. Six studies evaluated educational interventions, all employing simulation as an educational strategy, although there was considerable heterogeneity in content. Most outcomes were assessed with multiple-choice knowledge testing; only 2 studies evaluated the care of actual patients after an educational intervention. Conclusions There is a paucity of information describing MV education in GME. The available literature demonstrates that trainees are generally dissatisfied with MV training. Best practices include establishing MV-specific learning objectives and incorporating simulation. Next research steps include developing competency standards and validity evidence for assessment tools that can be utilized across MV educational curricula.

Palliative radiotherapy education in hospice and palliative medicine fellowship: A national needs assessment.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Emily Jean Martin ◽  
Joshua Adam Jones
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Palliative Medicine ◽  
Palliative Radiotherapy ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Fellowship Program ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Fellowship Programs ◽  
Curricular Interventions ◽  
Fractionation Schedules

87 Background: Educational deficiencies among hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) physicians are thought to contribute to sub-optimal utilization of palliative radiotherapy (PRT) for patients with advanced cancer. We conducted a national survey of HPM fellowship program directors and fellows to assess the need for increased PRT education in HPM fellowship. Methods: A 17-item, anonymous, electronic survey was distributed via email in May 2018 to the directors of all US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited HPM fellowship programs with at least one enrolled fellow. A similar 19-item survey was emailed to the coordinators of these programs for distribution to enrolled fellows. Three reminder emails were sent over a one-month period. Results: Eighty-one (68%) of 120 eligible program directors and 114 (34%) of 338 eligible fellows completed the surveys. Nearly all respondents (98% of program directors and 99% of fellows) agreed that HPM physicians should be familiar with the principles of PRT and 95% of both groups agreed that this topic should be taught in HPM fellowship. Thirty percent of programs, however, lacked any PRT curriculum and 57% of programs provided only 1 or 2 hours of didactic PRT education. The minority of fellows felt confident in their ability to identify radiation oncology emergencies (43%) or to manage symptoms associated with radiotherapy toxicities (42%) and only 56% felt confident in their ability to assess which patients should be referred to radiation oncology for possible PRT. Notably, the majority of fellows reported that if they were more knowledgeable about PRT they would be more likely to consider referral to radiation oncology (78%), to collaborate with the radiation oncologists involved in their patients’ care (76%), and to advocate for shorter fractionation schedules or possible omission of radiation therapy altogether based on a patient’s prognosis or goals of care (78%). Conclusions: HPM fellowship program directors and fellows agree that that there is a need for increased education in PRT in HPM fellowship. Curricular interventions that address this need may result in more appropriate utilization of PRT.

scholarly journals Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham Fellowship Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00894
Author(s):  
Robert M. Stern ◽  
M. Dror Michaelson ◽  
Erica L. Mayer ◽  
Aric D. Parnes ◽  
Annemarie E. Fogerty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The United States ◽  
First Year ◽  
Fellowship Program ◽  
Dana Farber Cancer Institute ◽  
Fellowship Programs ◽  
Direct Feedback ◽  
Research Structure

The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic has affected graduate medical education training programs, including hematology-oncology fellowship programs, both across the United States and abroad. Within the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham hematology-oncology fellowship program, fellowship leadership had to quickly reorganize the program's clinical, educational, and research structure to minimize the risk of COVID-19 spread to our patients and staff, allow fellows to assist in the care of patients with COVID-19, maintain formal didactics despite physical distancing, and ensure the mental and physical well-being of fellows. Following the first wave of patients with COVID-19, we anonymously surveyed the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Mass General Brigham first-year fellows to explore their perceptions regarding what the program did well and what could have been improved in the COVID-19 response. In this article, we present the feedback from our fellows and the lessons we learned as a program from this feedback. To our knowledge, this represents the first effort in the hematology-oncology literature to directly assess a hematology-oncology program's overall response to COVID-19 through direct feedback from fellows.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document