scholarly journals Pipeline Embolization Device for Pericallosal Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Single Center Safety and Efficacy Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katyucia De Macedo Rodrigues ◽  
Anna Luisa Kühn ◽  
Takamitsu Tamura ◽  
Guilherme Dabus ◽  
Peter Kan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Pericallosal Artery ◽  
Flow Diverter Stent ◽  
Procedural Complication ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Flow Diverters

Abstract BACKGROUND Pericallosal artery aneurysm treatment may be challenging using traditional endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment of pericallosal artery aneurysm using flow diverters. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database from July 2013 through July 2016 and identified 7 subjects with a pericallosal artery aneurysm treated with the Pipeline embolization device (ev3 Neurovascular, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and at least 1 follow-up angiogram. Technical feasibility, procedural complication, angiographic results, and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS Placement of the Pipeline embolization device was successful in all cases without evidence of procedural complication. Five out of 7 subjects showed a complete aneurysm occlusion at 6- to 12-mo follow-up angiogram. The 2 subjects with persistent aneurysm filling showed decreased aneurysm sac volume on follow-up angiograms (96% and 60%). There was no evidence of in-implant stenosis or intimal hyperplasia. No thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications were seen during the follow-up period. Only 1 patient had a transient change in Modified Rankin scale score from baseline as a result of different unrelated procedure. CONCLUSION Our preliminary results demonstrate feasibility of the use of flow diverter stent for treatment of aneurysms of the pericallosal artery with rate of aneurysm occlusion comparable to literature and without evidence of increased procedural or short-term morbidity. A long-term and larger cohort study is needed to validate our findings.

Abstract 1122‐000103: FlowDiverter:A Study Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 53 Patient and 60 Aneurysm

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bolcato ◽  
ana Carolina Dalmonico ◽  
Leo Ditzel ◽  
Savio Machareti ◽  
Thiago Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grading Scale ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Flow Diverters

Introduction : Endovascular flow diverters are increasingly used for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the Flow Diverters in a consecutive series of 53 patients and 60 aneurysms. Methods : Inclusion criteria were wide‐neck, blister‐like, or fusiform aneurysms independent of size, treated with the FRED, PIPELINE and SILK between December 2014 and Junho 2021. Assessment criteria were aneurysm occlusion, manifest ischemic stroke, bleeding, or death. The occlusion rate was assessed at 6 months and 1 year with DSA by using the Raymond classification and the O'Kelly‐Marotta grading scale. Results : Fifty three patients (mean age 54.3 years;81.1% female) with 60 aneurysms were treated with 9 Silk, 38 FREDs and 13 Pipeline. Aneurysm size ranged from 2.5 to 30 mm. Deployment of the Flow diverters was successful in 52 aneurysms. Three patient developed mild stroke symptoms that fully receded within days, 4 patients occlusion total carotid because resistant antiagregation and another patient’s development Swelling syndrome. There has been one death. Initial follow‐up at 6 months showed complete occlusion in 90% of the overall study group and 93,33% at 1 year. Conclusions : The flow diverter is a safe device for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms of various types. Our data reveal high occlusion rates at 6 months and 1 year. Long‐term occlusion rates are expected.

scholarly journals Very delayed discontinuation of telescoped Pipeline embolization devices: a case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-186
Author(s):  
Manoj Bohara ◽  
Kosuke Teranishi ◽  
Kenji Yatomi ◽  
Takashi Fujii ◽  
Takayuki Kitamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion

Background Flow diversion with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a widely accepted treatment modality for aneurysm occlusion. Previous reports have shown no recanalization of aneurysms on long-term follow-up once total occlusion has been achieved. Case description We report on a 63-year-old male who had a large internal carotid artery cavernous segment aneurysm. Treatment with PED resulted in complete occlusion of the aneurysm. However, follow-up angiography at four years revealed recurrence of the aneurysm due to disconnection of the two PEDs placed in telescoping fashion. Conclusion Herein, we present the clinico-radiological features and discuss the possible mechanisms resulting in the recanalization of aneurysms treated with flow diversion.

Successful management of bilateral internal carotid artery fusiform giant aneurysms in a patient with intimal fibroplasia using multiple flow diverters: With long-term imaging follow up

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110491
Author(s):  
Jieun Roh ◽  
Seung Kug Baik ◽  
Jeong A Yeom ◽  
Joo-Young Na ◽  
Sang-Won Lee
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Giant Aneurysms ◽  
The Past ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Flow Diverters

The authors report a rare case of sequentially developed bilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) fusiform giant aneurysms in a patient with pathologically confirmed intimal fibroplasia. Both ICA fusiform aneurysms were treated with multiple flow diverter insertion and were well-managed over the past 5.5 years of follow-up. The development of aneurysms in this rare disease entity appears to be a lifelong process based on the authors’ observations in serial angiographic follow-up studies. Reconstruction therapy using flow-diverting stents in this unique condition may be a safe and effective treatment modality.

Single-center experience with the new generation Derivo Embolization Device in ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Georg Kaschner ◽  
Athanasios Petridis ◽  
Bernd Turowski
Keyword(s):  
Digital Subtraction Angiography ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Digital Subtraction ◽  
Related Complication ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Flow Diverter Stent ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
New Generation

Background Treatment of ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms is technically challenging with potentially high morbidity and mortality. The Derivo Embolisation Device (Derivo) is a flow diverter stent designed for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Purpose To assess the safety and feasibility of the Derivo in the treatment of ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms. Material and Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients with ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms treated with the Derivo between February 2016 and July 2018. Procedural details, complications, morbidity within 30 days, and angiographic aneurysm occlusion rates, initially and after six months, were assessed. Results In 10 patients 11 ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms were treated with 12 Derivos as monotherapy. No aneurysm rebleeding was observed at follow-up. One treatment-related complication occurred including a coil perforation of an additionally treated aneurysm. One patient died due to brain edema. Initial digital subtraction angiography revealed complete (O’Kelly–Marotta [OKM] classification D) and favorable (OKM D+C) occlusion rate in three aneurysms. Six-month follow-up for digital subtraction angiography and clinical evaluation was available in 6/9 patients with complete (OKM D) occlusion in all aneurysms (6/6). Favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤ 2) and moderate (mRS 3) clinical outcome after a mean follow-up of 10 months was observed in six and two patients, respectively. Conclusion Endovascular treatment with the Derivo in ruptured dissecting and blister aneurysms revealed a sufficient initial division of aneurysms from the circulation without rebleeding. The Derivo is associated with high procedural and clinical short-term safety.

Transient in-stent stenosis: a common finding after flow diverter implantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus ◽  
Alena Haußmann ◽  
Andreas Simgen ◽  
Toshiki Tomori ◽  
Wolfgang Reith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Incomplete Occlusion ◽  
Flow Diverters ◽  
Stent Stenosis ◽  
Related Mortality

Background and purposeIn recent years, implantation of flow diverters has emerged as an option for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. One complication of treatment with flow diverters is the occurrence of in-stent stenosis, which has been reported to be partially reversible. The purpose of our study was to assess the incidence and dynamics of in-stent stenosis on angiographic short term and long term follow-up after treatment with flow diverters.MethodsA retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified all patients with intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms treated by flow diverters at our institution between 2014 and 2017. Clinical charts, procedural data, and angiographic results were reviewed.Results18 patients were included. The mean short term follow-up was 92±19 days and mean long term follow-up was 449±120 days after treatment. No neurologic complications were observed. There was no procedure related mortality. Long term angiographic results showed complete occlusion in 83.3%, neck remnants in 11.1%, and incomplete occlusion in 5.5% of cases. In-stent stenosis was observed in all cases. Mean stenosis improved significantly from 30% on short term follow-up to 12% on long-term follow-up (P<0.0001).ConclusionIn-stent stenosis is a common finding on short term follow-up after the treatment with flow diverters but improves over time.

scholarly journals Flow diverter for endovascular treatment of intracranial mirror segment internal carotid artery aneurysms

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Luisa Kühn ◽  
Peter Kan ◽  
Visish Srinivasan ◽  
David E Rex ◽  
Katyucia de Macedo Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Device Placement ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion

Background To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of unruptured intracranial mirror segment aneurysms. Methods Out of a total of 338 subjects, 14 were identified harboring a total of 32 internal carotid artery mirror segment aneurysms that were treated with the pipeline embolization device and were consecutively enrolled into our study. We collected data on patient demographics, modified Rankin scale (mRS) at admission, aneurysm characteristics, clinical outcome at discharge, 3–9 and at 12–18 months as well as angiography results at follow-up. Results Patients’ mean age was 52.9 years; baseline mRS was 0 in all subjects. Pipeline embolization device placement was successful in all cases. Post-treatment mRS remained 0 in 13/14 patients. One patient experienced a small intraparenchymal hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, associated with a frontoparietal infarction resulting in right upper extremity weakness and aphasia (post-treatment mRS 3). His mRS evaluation remained stable at the 3–9-month follow-up. Three to 9-month follow-up angiography (13/14 subjects) showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 24/30 aneurysms (80%), near complete and partial occlusion in three of 30 (10%) aneurysms each. At the 9-month follow-up, one patient experienced a complete occlusion of the anterior temporal artery branch but did not present with any clinical deficits. No mRS changes were encountered over a median 6-month follow-up period. Mid-term follow-up angiography (12–18 months) available in eight of 14 subjects showed complete aneurysm occlusion in all patients. Mild intimal hyperplasia was observed in one patient. Conclusions Flow diversion technology can be used for the treatment of unruptured mirror segment aneurysms in selected patients.

Aneurysms with persistent patency after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device

2016 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1894-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kan ◽  
Visish M. Srinivasan ◽  
Nnenna Mbabuike ◽  
Rabih G. Tawk ◽  
Vin Shen Ban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Cerebral Aneurysms ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Superior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverters

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) was approved for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segment of the internal carotid artery. However, since its approval, its use for treatment of intracranial aneurysms in other locations and non-sidewall aneurysms has grown tremendously. The authors report on a cohort of 15 patients with 16 cerebral aneurysms that incorporated an end vessel with no significant distal collaterals, which were treated with the PED. The cohort includes 7 posterior communicating artery aneurysms, 5 ophthalmic artery aneurysms, 1 superior cerebellar artery aneurysm, 1 anterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, and 2 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. None of the aneurysms achieved significant occlusion at the last follow-up evaluation (mean 24 months). Based on these observations, the authors do not recommend the use of flow diverters for the treatment of this subset of cerebral aneurysms.

Factors associated with in-stent stenosis after cerebral aneurysm embolization using a Pipeline embolization device

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110663
Author(s):  
Gabriel Flores-Milan ◽  
Elliot Pressman ◽  
Ivo Peto ◽  
Zeguang Ren ◽  
Waldo R. Guerrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Flow Diverter Stent ◽  
Aneurysm Embolization ◽  
History Of ◽  
Vertebrobasilar Junction ◽  
Digital Subtraction Angiogram ◽  
Stent Stenosis ◽  
Statin Use

Background Flow-diverting (FD) stents, with or without coiling, are a mainstay in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). One observed complication from flow diverter stent (FDS) insertion has been in-stent stenosis. Though previously studied in the short-term period, the long-term history of this complication has yet to be described. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive IAs treated with Pipeline Embolization Device (PED), with or without coiling, at our centre between September 2014 and December 2018 that had at least one digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) during follow-up. In-stent stenosis was measured from DSA images, and associated patient and procedural characteristics were analysed. Results 94 patients treated with PED for IA were identified. On initial DSA during follow-up, 52 patients (55.3%) had in-stent stenosis within the PED. Of these 52 patients, 17 had a second DSA during follow-up. In this 2nd DSA, improvement and/or stable in-stent stenosis was seen 16 patients (94.1%). One patient in this group had worsening in-stent stenosis had a vertebrobasilar junction FD stent. Of the patients without in-stent stenosis on initial DSA, 15 had a second DSA during follow-up. Only one of these patients (6.7%) had new appearance of in-stent stenosis (measuring 5%). Multivariate analysis found statin use to be predictive of in-stent stenosis (p = 0.020, Odds ratio = 0.279 and 95% confidence interval = 0.095–0.821). Conclusions In-stent stenosis after FDS placement was seen in 53.2% of cases, which had between 1–50% of stenosis. 82.4% had resolution/improvement of their stenosis. Statin use was protective of in-stent stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document