Conclusion: Human Rights Treaties (Sometimes) Protect Rights

Human Rights Regime ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

This chapter highlights the conclusions and contributions of theresearch: obligation to international law can constrain leaders from violating human rights-and encourage potential dissidents to revolt against their governments. The argument that human rights treaties "work" is contrary to the explanations of a wide variety of scholars who maintain that the international human rights regime has been an abject failure. Although scholars have found evidence that domestic institutions can lead to decreased repression, there has been little support for the argument that international institutions do so.In contrast, this book finds that-if international law creates even the smallest shift in assumptions over domestic consequences for repressive authorities-these effects can yield a substantively meaningful reduction in rights violations when leaders have significant stakes in domestic conflicts.

Signaling commitments, making concessions: Democratization and state ratification of international human rights treaties, 1966–2006

Rationality and Society ◽

10.1177/1043463114546313 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 26 (4) ◽

pp. 475-508 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Min Zhou

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Political Competition ◽

Empirical Support ◽

Dynamic State ◽

Promoting Effect ◽

Human Rights Regime ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

How is the establishment of the international human rights regime possible in the first place? Bringing together theories from international law, political science, and sociology, I revisit the argument that global efforts to institutionalize human rights into international law are mainly driven by states undergoing democratization. Political democratization is crucial to the creation of the international human rights regime, because it generates “commitment” and “concession” mechanisms that motivate states to support human rights treaties. Analyzed by Cox event history models, the data on state ratification of the core United Nations human rights treaties from 1966 through 2006 are consistent with this argument. Improvement in human rights and increased political competition do significantly increase the rate of state ratification of human rights treaties. The ratification-promoting effect of democratization also operates in an immediate fashion. Overall, this study provides empirical support for the dynamic state-oriented explanation for global legalization of human rights and suggests a close connection between global democratization waves and the establishment of the human rights regime.

The Idea of International Human Rights Law

10.1093/oso/9780198749844.001.0001 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Steven Wheatley

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Fragmentation Of International Law

Moral Concept ◽

Customary International Law ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

International Human ◽

International Human Rights Law has emerged as an academic subject in its own right, separate from, but still related to, International Law. This book explains the distinctive nature of the new discipline by examining the influence of the moral concept of human rights on general international law. Rather than make use of moral philosophy or political theory, the work explains the term ‘human rights’ by examining its usage in international law practice, on the understanding that words are given meaning through their use. Relying on complexity theory to make sense of the legal practice in the United Nations, the core human rights treaties, and customary international law, The Idea of International Human Rights Law shows how a moral concept of human rights emerged, and then influenced the international law doctrine and practice on human rights, a fact that explains the fragmentation of international law and the special nature of International Human Rights Law.

Why International Law? The Development of the International Human Rights Regime in the Twentieth Century

Mobilizing for Human Rights ◽

10.1017/cbo9780511811340.002 ◽

2012 ◽

pp. 23-56

Author(s):

Beth A. Simmons

Keyword(s):

Twentieth Century ◽

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Human Rights Regime ◽

Theory and Evidence Regarding the Effectiveness of Human Rights Treaties

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics ◽

10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.544 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Daniel W. Hill, Jr.

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Good Evidence ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

International Treaties ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

Sources Of Variation ◽

The adoption by the United Nations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 marked the beginning of the modern international human rights regime. Since then the number of international treaties that protect human rights, as well as the number of internationally recognized rights, has greatly increased. The increasing number and scope of international treaties attests to the fact that advocates for human rights view treaties, which are legally binding in principle, as useful tools for promoting respect for the various rights identified in international law. Only recently have scholars begun to collect and systematically examine evidence concerning the effectiveness of human rights treaties. This new body of research is motivated by a question that has obvious normative import and policy relevance: do we have good evidence that the widespread adoption of international human rights law has had any meaningful impact on the level of respect that states exhibit for the rights articulated in international law? To date, this literature suggests three sources of variation in the effectiveness of human rights treaties: (1) variation in the domestic political and legal institutions that facilitate enforcement and compliance, (2) variation in the nature of the rights protected by different treaties and the nature of violations, and (3) variation in the strength of governments’ commitments to the UN treaty regime. All three sources of variation point to opportunities to advance our understanding of the conditions under which international human rights law can achieve its goals.

International Constitutional Law and Judicial Review of Domestic Human Rights Legislation

ICL Journal ◽

10.1515/icl-2018-0064 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 87-118

Author(s):

Laura-Stella Enonchong

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Constitutional Law ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Domestic Sphere ◽

Human Rights Regime ◽

International Human ◽

Human Rights Norms

Abstract This article discusses the idea of international human rights law as ‘constitutional law’. It applies the French concept of Le contrôle de conventionnalité des lois, to demonstrate the constitutional potentials of international human rights law in the domestic sphere. In most monist constitutional systems based on the French civilian model, international law takes precedence over acts of parliament and other domestic legislation. Due in part to that hierarchy, conventionnalité permits the courts to review domestic law for compatibility with international law. From that perspective, international human rights norms can be said to have assumed a ‘para-constitutional’ function. Using two case studies from francophone Africa, this article argues that conventionnalité has the potential to play a significant role in the domestic implementation of international human rights and ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive domestic human rights regime.

The problem of applying reservations to international human rights agreements

Law and innovations ◽

10.37772/2518-1718-2021-1(33)-10 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 68-73

Author(s):

Ivanna Maryniv ◽

Liubov Rudai

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Legal Regulation ◽

European Convention ◽

Effective Control ◽

International Treaties ◽

European Court ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

A problem statement. Human rights law, as a branch of public international law, to date, is mainly codified and consists mainly of treaty rules contained in universal and regional conventions. At the same time, in most cases, the parties to these agreements make reservations of both a substantive and procedural nature that apply to all generations of human rights. The question arises as to the legitimacy of the reservations declared by states to international acts on human rights and freedoms. Аnalysis of research and publications. Many international lawyers deal with the issue of reservations to human rights treaties and their validity. Thus, the works of E.S. Alisievich, are devoted to this issue, I.I. Lukashuk, V.G. Butkevich, V.L. Tolstoy, M.V. Buromensky and others. However, there are a number of problems with the legal regime of reservations to human rights treaties. The main thesis that reveals their essence is that there is no mechanism for effective control over the legitimacy of such reservations. The main text. The article considers the concept of reservations to international treaties, examines the problem of issuing reservations to international human rights treaties. The application of the institution of reservations is studied on the example of certain international treaties in the field of human rights, such as: the European Convention on Human Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights on the application of reservations to the European Convention on Human Rights is studied. Conclusions. Today, the sovereign right of every state to stipulate international treaties is firmly established in international law, but there is no clear legal regulation of this institution that would prevent abuses by states in this area. We see the need to further study the institution of reservations to human rights treaties, its development and the development of general principles, procedures, and control over their legitimacy.

Conflict over Conflict: The Right to Strike in International Law

Global Labour Journal ◽

10.15173/glj.v8i1.2649 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Diane F Frey

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Political Rights ◽

International Labour Organisation ◽

Cultural Rights ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

International Human ◽

The Right

<p>The existence of a right to strike under international law has been challenged by the International Organization of Employers since the late 1980s. The employer group claims that no such right exists under international law and has been moving to undermine recognition of the right at the International Labour Organisation (ILO). This article examines the right to strike in international human rights law. It considers specifically the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and finds that the right to strike exists in both of these treaties. Further, the article demonstrates that while the ILO employers group may challenge the existence of the right to strike, its government members have overwhelmingly ratified international human rights treaties contradicting the employer group's position that there is no such right.</p>

Domestic Human Rights Adjudication in the Shadow of International Law: The Status of Human Rights Conventions in Israel

Israel Law Review ◽

10.1017/s0021223717000164 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 50 (3) ◽

pp. 331-388 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Barak Medina

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Democratic Legitimacy ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Quarter Century ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

International Human ◽

The Government

The quarter-century anniversary of Israel's ratification of the major United Nations (UN) human rights treaties is an opportunity to revisit the formal and informal interaction between domestic and international Bills of Rights in Israel. This study reveals that the human rights conventions lack almost entirely a formal domestic legal status. The study identifies a minor shift in the scope of the Israeli Supreme Court's reference to international law, as the Court now cites international human rights law to justify decisions that a state action is unlawful, and not only to support findings that an action is valid. This shift may be the result of other reasons, for instance, a ‘radiation’ of the Court's relatively extensive use of international humanitarian law in reviewing state actions taken in the Occupied Territories. However, it may also reflect a perception of enhanced legitimacy of referring to international human rights law as a point of reference in human rights adjudication following ratification of the treaties.At the same time, the Court continues to avoid acknowledging incompatibility between domestic law and international law. It refers to the latter only to support its interpretation of Israeli constitutional law, as it did before the ratification. This article critically evaluates this practice. While international human rights law should not be binding at the domestic level, because of its lack of sufficient democratic legitimacy in Israel, it should serve as an essential benchmark. The Court may legitimise a human rights infringement that is unjustified according to international law, but such incompatibility requires an explicit justification. The Court, together with the legislature and the government, are required to engage critically with the non-binding norms set by the ratified UN human rights treaties.

Why Do National Court Judges Refer to Human Rights Treaties? A Comparative International Law Analysis of CEDAW

The American Journal of International Law ◽

10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0534 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 109 (3) ◽

pp. 534-550 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Christopher McCrudden

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

National Court ◽

Human Rights Law ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

Similarities And Differences ◽

International Human ◽

Domestic Level

Comparative international law promises to bring fresh attention to the similarities and differences in how international law is understood and approached at the domestic level. Comparative international human rights law applies this focus to similarities and differences in the ways that international human rights law is, for example, interpreted at the domestic level by courts.

Part 2 Interrelations between Constitutionalism and Sharī’ah: Antagonism or Complementarity?, 2.1 Constitutionalism in Islamic Countries: A Survey from the Perspective of International Law

10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199759880.003.0005 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

Wolfrum Rüdiger

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Middle East ◽

International Law ◽

Historical Development ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Human Rights Treaties ◽

International Human ◽

The Impact ◽

The Relationship

This chapter examines the influence of international law and Islamic law on the constitutions of Islamic states. It discusses the historical development of the relationship between Islamic law and international law; reference to human rights and international law in the constitutions of Islamic states (Africa, Middle East, and Asia); and the impact of the Sharīʻah on the ratification of international human rights treaties.