Front Lines and Status Lines
.Over 1897-1902, the Tirah campaign, the South African war and the China expedition made it necessary to re-organise the standing non-combatant units of the Indian Army. The contention was that the combatant and the follower ranks of the Indian Army were recruited from entirely different rural strata. In fact there was a considerable overlap in recruiting pools. This overlap increased in World War one due to the growing importance of the auxiliary services and the need to conserve all labor and use it more ‘efficiently’. The ‘higher’ followers, those organised in distinct departments, such as mule-driver and stretcher-bearer units, benefitted from the unsettling of status hierarchies and wage differences; less so the attached or ‘menial’ followers who provided ‘domestic’ services and included ‘untouchable’ service-providers in their ranks. The chapter engages with the global history of domestic work to examine the production of ‘menial’ status in the institutional context of the Indian Army., The care-giving services of the ‘menial’ follower reproduced both the ‘martial caste’ standing of the Indian soldier and the race standing of the British soldier. The ‘menial follower’ tried to stabilise his situation of institutional precarity but remained vulnerable to a regime of personal and discretionary discipline.