Article 4(22). Supervisory authority concerned

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Definition Of

Article 4(2) (Definition of ‘processing’); Article 4(21) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority’); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 52 (Independence); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority); Article 60 (Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recitals 135 and 138); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board); Article 66 (Urgency procedure); Article 74 (Tasks of the Chair); Article 77 (Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority).

Article 60 Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
The Other ◽  
Mutual Assistance ◽  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Joint Operations ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Article 50

Article 4(16) (Definition of ‘main establishment’) (see too recital 36); Article 4(22) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority concerned’) (see also recital 36); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 4(24) (Definition of ‘relevant and reasoned objection’) (see too recital 124); Article 50 (International cooperation for the protection of personal data) (see too recitals 102 and 116); Article 55 (Competence of the supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122 and 128); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority) (see also recitals 124–128); Article 57(1)(g) (Supervisory authorities’ task to cooperate with other supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 123 and 133); Article 58 (Powers of supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122 and 129); Article 61 (Mutual assistance) (see too recitals 123 and 133); Article 62 (Joint operations of supervisory authorities) (see too recital 134); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recitals 13, 136 and 138); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board) (see also recitals 135–136); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board) (see too recitals 136 and 143); and Article 66 (Urgency procedure) (see too recitals 137–138).

Article 4(16). Main establishment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Definition Of

Article 4(7) (Definition of ‘controller’); Article 4(8) (Definition of ‘processor’); Article 4(19) (Definition of ‘group of undertakings’); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority) (see too recitals 124–128); Article 60 (Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned) (see too recitals 130–131); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board).

Article 66 Urgency procedure

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludmila Georgieva
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Mutual Assistance ◽  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Joint Operations

Article 4(21)–(22) (Definitions, supervisory authority and supervisory authority concerned); Article 60 (Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned); Article 61 (Mutual assistance) (see too recital 133); Article 62 (Joint operations of supervisory authorities) (see too recital 134); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recital 135); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board), Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board) (see too recital 136); Article 70 (Tasks of the Board) (see too recital 136).

Article 56 Competence of the lead supervisory authority

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hielke Hijmans
Keyword(s):  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Article 59 ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Definition Of

Article 4(16) (Definition of ‘main establishment’); Article 4(22) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority concerned’); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 57 (Tasks of supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122–123 and 132–133); Article 58 (Powers of supervisory authorities) (see too recital 129); Article 59 (Activity reports); Articles 60–67 (Cooperation and Consistency) (see also recitals 126 and 130–138).

Article 65 Dispute resolution by the Board

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hielke Hijmans
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

Article 4(16) (Definition of the main establishment) (see too recital 36); Article 4(24) (Definition of a relevant and reasoned objection) (see too recital 124); Article 60(4) (Objection by a concerned supervisory authority to a draft decision of the lead supervisory authority); Articles 60(7)–(9) (Procedure to adopt a final decision by a supervisory authority); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recitals 123, 135 and 150 in fine); Article 64 (Cases when opinions of the Board are mandatory); Article 66 (Derogations from the consistency mechanism in case of urgency) (see too recitals 137–138); Article 74(1)(b) (Notification of binding decisions by the Chair of the Board); Article 74(1)(c) (Chair of the Board to ensure the timely performance of the Board’s tasks); Article 75(6)(g) (Secretariat to prepare, draft and publish decisions on the settlement of disputes between supervisory authorities) (see too recital 140); Article 76(1) (Confidentiality of Board’s discussions when necessary).

Article 4(23). Cross-border processing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni
Keyword(s):  
Supervisory Authority ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Joint Operations ◽  
Definition Of

Article 4(2) (Definition of ‘processing’); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority); Article 62(2) (Joint operations of supervisory authorities); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recital 135).

General Provisions

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-76
Author(s):  
European Law
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
21St Century ◽  
General Principle ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Fundamental Importance ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Principle Of Proportionality ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

This chapter discusses the general provisions concerning the operation of the European Rules of Civil Procedure. It defines the scope of these Rules, limiting their application to domestic and cross-border civil and commercial disputes. It does so by reference to the definition of such disputes that is commonly accepted throughout Europe. The chapter then looks at the overarching procedural duties that are imposed upon the court, parties, and their lawyers. The most significant of these duties are the duty of co-operation, which is understood in these Rules to be of fundamental importance to the effective and proper administration of justice, and the general principle of proportionality in dispute resolution, which has itself become an increasingly important procedural principle across Europe since the start of the 21st century. Finally, the chapter articulates and, in some cases, gives concrete effect to the fundamental procedural principles that are inherent in the right to fair trial.

Article 4(24). Relevant and reasoned objection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Supervisory Authority

Article 60 (Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board).

scholarly journals Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services—Barriers and Conditions

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Wróblewski ◽  
Bogusław Dziadzia ◽  
Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Management ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cultural Institutions ◽  
Cultural Services ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
National Border ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Political Turmoil ◽  
The Town

The concept of sustainable management in culture has been recognised in global strategic documents on sustainable development for more than a decade. It is also increasingly reflected in the cultural polices of particular states, and—very importantly—cultural managers who are responsible for shaping the cultural offer in cities are becoming more interested in this concept. Despite the increasing attention being paid to this topic among both practitioners and theoreticians of management, in none of these documents or other works can we find any content that is directly related to the possibility of applying this concept in a town which, due to political turmoil, has been divided by a national border. Hence, this gap was the direct impulse for taking up research in this field. In the article, by using different notions of the market, our own definition of a cross-border market for cultural services was developed, and the conditions for the functioning of this market were presented based on the example town of Cieszyn (Poland) and Český Těšín (Czech Republic). In the opinion of the authors of the article, the development and functioning of a cross-border market for cultural services is essential for the application of the concept of sustainable management of the cultural offer in a town divided by a border. For the purpose of the article, a survey and individual interviews with experts shaping the cultural offer in Cieszyn and Český Těšín were conducted. The results of the research prove that despite numerous cross-border Czech–Polish projects carried out by cultural institutions, there are still many barriers in the town, which make it difficult for the residents to benefit from the cultural offer that is available on the other side of the border. These barriers limit the full implementation and application of the concept of sustainable management of the cultural offer.

scholarly journals Sustainable Management of the Offer of Cultural Institutions in the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services – Barriers and Conditions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Wróblewski ◽  
Bogusław Dziadzia ◽  
Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Management ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cultural Institutions ◽  
Cultural Services ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
National Border ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Political Turmoil ◽  
The Town

The concept of sustainable management in culture has been recognised in global strategic documents on sustainable development for more than a decade. It is also increasingly reflected in the cultural polices of particular states, and – very importantly –cultural managers responsible for shaping the cultural offer in cities are becoming more interested in this concept. Despite the increasing attention being paid to this topic among both practitioners and theoreticians of management, in none of these documents or other works can we find any content directly related to the possibility of applying this concept in a town which, due to political turmoil, has been divided by a national border. Hence, this gap was the direct impulse for taking up research in this field. In the article, by using different notions of the market, our own definition of a cross-border market for cultural services was developed, and the conditions for the functioning of this market were presented based on the example town of Cieszyn (Poland) and Český Těšín (Czech Republic). In the opinion of the authors of the article, the development and functioning of a cross-border market for cultural services is essential for the application of the concept of sustainable management of the cultural offer in a town divided by a border. For the purpose of the article, a survey and individual interviews with experts shaping the cultural offer in Cieszyn and Český Těšín were conducted. The results of the research prove that despite numerous cross-border Czech-Polish projects carried out by cultural institutions, there are still many barriers in the town which make it difficult for the residents to benefit from the cultural offer available on the other side of the border. These barriers limit the full implementation and application of the concept of sustainable management of the cultural offer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document