Article 56 Competence of the lead supervisory authority

Author(s):  
Hielke Hijmans

Article 4(16) (Definition of ‘main establishment’); Article 4(22) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority concerned’); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 57 (Tasks of supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122–123 and 132–133); Article 58 (Powers of supervisory authorities) (see too recital 129); Article 59 (Activity reports); Articles 60–67 (Cooperation and Consistency) (see also recitals 126 and 130–138).

Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni

Article 4(16) (Definition of ‘main establishment’) (see too recital 36); Article 4(22) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority concerned’) (see also recital 36); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 4(24) (Definition of ‘relevant and reasoned objection’) (see too recital 124); Article 50 (International cooperation for the protection of personal data) (see too recitals 102 and 116); Article 55 (Competence of the supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122 and 128); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority) (see also recitals 124–128); Article 57(1)(g) (Supervisory authorities’ task to cooperate with other supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 123 and 133); Article 58 (Powers of supervisory authorities) (see too recitals 122 and 129); Article 61 (Mutual assistance) (see too recitals 123 and 133); Article 62 (Joint operations of supervisory authorities) (see too recital 134); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recitals 13, 136 and 138); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board) (see also recitals 135–136); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board) (see too recitals 136 and 143); and Article 66 (Urgency procedure) (see too recitals 137–138).


Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni

Article 4(2) (Definition of ‘processing’); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority); Article 62(2) (Joint operations of supervisory authorities); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recital 135).


Author(s):  
Luca Tosoni

Article 4(2) (Definition of ‘processing’); Article 4(21) (Definition of ‘supervisory authority’); Article 4(23) (Definition of ‘cross-border processing’); Article 52 (Independence); Article 56 (Competence of the lead supervisory authority); Article 60 (Cooperation between the lead supervisory authority and the other supervisory authorities concerned); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism) (see too recitals 135 and 138); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board); Article 65 (Dispute resolution by the Board); Article 66 (Urgency procedure); Article 74 (Tasks of the Chair); Article 77 (Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority).


Author(s):  
Hielke Hijmans

Article 3(1) (Territorial scope) (see too recital 22); Article 4(21) (Definition of supervisory authority); Articles 51–54 (Independent Status) (see too recitals 117–121); Article 56 (Competence of the lead authority) (see too recitals 124–131), Article 57 (Tasks) (see too recitals 122–123 and 132–133) Article 58 (Powers) (see too recital 129); Article 59 (Activity reports).


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1389
Author(s):  
Julia García Cabello ◽  
Pedro A. Castillo ◽  
Maria-del-Carmen Aguilar-Luzon ◽  
Francisco Chiclana ◽  
Enrique Herrera-Viedma

Standard methodologies for redesigning physical networks rely on Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which strongly depend on local demographic specifications. The absence of a universal definition of demography makes its use for cross-border purposes much more difficult. This paper presents a Decision Making Model (DMM) for redesigning networks that works without geographical constraints. There are multiple advantages of this approach: on one hand, it can be used in any country of the world; on the other hand, the absence of geographical constraints widens the application scope of our approach, meaning that it can be successfully implemented either in physical (ATM networks) or non-physical networks such as in group decision making, social networks, e-commerce, e-governance and all fields in which user groups make decisions collectively. Case studies involving both types of situations are conducted in order to illustrate the methodology. The model has been designed under a data reduction strategy in order to improve application performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 449-454
Author(s):  
Kamen Petrov ◽  

The exhibition presents the problems of cross-border cooperation and opportunities for partnership. Within the European Union, conditions are created for regional development on the national territory, as well as for border and cross-border cooperation. In this direction, the article outlines the processes of building a number of Euroregions, which are designed to promote regional development. This report will clarify some of the reasons for their construction, their role and what model of cooperation is available within the European Economic Area.


Author(s):  
Michele Missikoff ◽  
Fabrizio Smith ◽  
Francesco Taglino

This chapter intends to report about the ongoing activities in the COIN European project concerning semantic reconciliation of business documents for supporting interoperability of software applications in e-government and e-business scenarios. The approach is based on a reference ontology against which business documents are mapped through semantic annotation and building of reconciliation rules. The work starts from the semantic reconciliation suite developed in the ATHENA1 European project and intends to improve the suite by providing an automatic support to the definition of mappings. In order to do that, three automatic services have been developed: (1) semantic annotation of business documents; (2) definition of transformation rules; (3) rules optimization and fusion. A running example concerning the exchange of a legal verification document in a scenario of cross border cooperation between European chambers of commerce will guide through the description of the services.


Author(s):  
Wolfgang Bogensberger

Article 31 TEU The European Parliament and the Council may, by means of directives adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the areas of particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension resulting from the nature or impact of such offences or from a special need to combat them on a common basis.


2018 ◽  
pp. 12-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Wilkins ◽  
Laura Rumbley

Although international branch campuses have become an established part of the cross-border higher education landscape, there is still debate about what an international branch campus actually is. The purpose of this article is to propose a revised definition of “international branch campus” that is clearer and more implementable than existing definitions. To achieve this goal, we considered how the terms “branch” and “campus” are used in business and higher education, and then identified the core features of these campuses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document