Quantum Optomechanics: from Gravitational Wave Detectors to Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics

2020 ◽  
pp. 129-182
Author(s):  
Yanbei Chen
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Measurement ◽  
Quantum Noise ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Measurement Sensitivity ◽  
Macroscopic Quantum ◽  
Standard Quantum Limit ◽  
Macroscopic Objects ◽  
Non Gaussian ◽  
Quantum Optomechanics

The quantum measurement process connects the quantum world and the classical world. The phrase ‘quantum measurement’ can have two meanings: measurement of a weak classical force, with the impact of quatum fluctuations on the measurement sensitivity, and the quantum mechanics of macroscopic objects: to try to prepare, manipulate and characterize the quantum state of a macroscopic quantum object through quantum measurement. Quantum noise leads to the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL), which provides the magnitude in which we must consider both measurement precision and measurement-induced back-action. The beginning of the chapter will be devoted to this thread of thought. The free-mass SQL actually provides a benchmark for the ‘quantum-ness’ of the system. We will show that a sub-SQL device can be used to prepare nearly pure quantum states and mechanical entanglement, as well as non-Gaussian quantum states that have no classical counterparts.

scholarly journals Examples of Non-Constructive Proofs in Quantum Theory

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Arkady Bolotin
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Infinite Number ◽  
Physical Science ◽  
Physical Theory ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Standard Quantum ◽  
Macroscopic Quantum ◽  
Quantum Formalism ◽  
Constructive Proofs

<p class="1Body">Unlike mathematics, in which the notion of truth might be abstract, in physics, the emphasis must be placed on algorithmic procedures for obtaining numerical results subject to the experimental verifiability. For, a physical science is exactly that: algorithmic procedures (built on a certain mathematical formalism) for obtaining verifiable conclusions from a set of basic hypotheses. By admitting non-constructivist statements, a physical theory loses its concrete applicability and thus verifiability of its predictions. Accordingly, the requirement of constructivism must be indispensable to any physical theory. Nevertheless, in at least some physical theories, and especially in quantum mechanics, one can find examples of non-constructive statements. The present paper demonstrates a couple of such examples dealing with macroscopic quantum states (i.e., with the applicability of the standard quantum formalism to macroscopic systems). As it is shown, in these examples the proofs of the existence of macroscopic quantum states are based on logical principles allowing one to decide the truth of predicates over an infinite number of things.</p>

Quantum Theory

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Theory ◽  
Uncertainty Principle ◽  
Quantum Spin ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Wave Functions ◽  
Symbolic Representations ◽  
Quantum Numbers ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

The subject of Chapter 8 is the fundamental principles of quantum theory, the abstract extension of quantum mechanics. Two of the entities explored are kets and operators, with kets being representations of quantum states as well as a source of wave functions. The quantum box and quantum spin kets are specified, as are the quantum numbers that identify them. Operators are introduced and defined in part as the symbolic representations of observable quantities such as position, momentum and quantum spin. Eigenvalues and eigenkets are defined and discussed, with the former identified as the possible outcomes of a measurement. Bras, the counterpart to kets, are introduced as the means of forming probability amplitudes from kets. Products of operators are examined, as is their role underpinning Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. A variety of symbol manipulations are presented. How measurements are believed to collapse linear superpositions to one term of the sum is explored.

Quantum Optomechanics and Nanomechanics

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Wave ◽  
Summer School ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Quantum Noise ◽  
Foundations Of Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Measurement Laser ◽  
Quantum Limits ◽  
Quantum Optomechanics ◽  
Quantum Ground State

The Les Houches Summer School 2015 covered the emerging fields of cavity optomechanics and quantum nanomechanics. Optomechanics is flourishing and its concepts and techniques are now applied to a wide range of topics. Modern quantum optomechanics was born in the late 70s in the framework of gravitational wave interferometry, initially focusing on the quantum limits of displacement measurements. Carlton Caves, Vladimir Braginsky, and others realized that the sensitivity of the anticipated large-scale gravitational-wave interferometers (GWI) was fundamentally limited by the quantum fluctuations of the measurement laser beam. After tremendous experimental progress, the sensitivity of the upcoming next generation of GWI will effectively be limited by quantum noise. In this way, quantum-optomechanical effects will directly affect the operation of what is arguably the world’s most impressive precision experiment. However, optomechanics has also gained a life of its own with a focus on the quantum aspects of moving mirrors. Laser light can be used to cool mechanical resonators well below the temperature of their environment. After proof-of-principle demonstrations of this cooling in 2006, a number of systems were used as the field gradually merged with its condensed matter cousin (nanomechanical systems) to try to reach the mechanical quantum ground state, eventually demonstrated in 2010 by pure cryogenic techniques and a year later by a combination of cryogenic and radiation-pressure cooling. The book covers all aspects—historical, theoretical, experimental—of the field, with its applications to quantum measurement, foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information. Essential reading for any researcher in the field.

scholarly journals Decoherence and its role in the modern measurement problem

2012 ◽  
Vol 370 (1975) ◽  
pp. 4576-4593 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Wave Function ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Measurement ◽  
Measurement Problem ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Measurement Theory ◽  
Quantum Measurements ◽  
Quantum Measurement Problem ◽  
Modern Physics ◽  
Conceptual Problems

Decoherence is widely felt to have something to do with the quantum measurement problem, but getting clear on just what is made difficult by the fact that the ‘measurement problem’, as traditionally presented in foundational and philosophical discussions, has become somewhat disconnected from the conceptual problems posed by real physics. This, in turn, is because quantum mechanics as discussed in textbooks and in foundational discussions has become somewhat removed from scientific practice, especially where the analysis of measurement is concerned. This paper has two goals: firstly (§§1–2), to present an account of how quantum measurements are actually dealt with in modern physics (hint: it does not involve a collapse of the wave function) and to state the measurement problem from the perspective of that account; and secondly (§§3–4), to clarify what role decoherence plays in modern measurement theory and what effect it has on the various strategies that have been proposed to solve the measurement problem.

scholarly journals A Note on the Hierarchy of Quantum Measurement Incompatibilities

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Bao-Zhi Sun ◽  
Zhi-Xi Wang ◽  
Xianqing Li-Jost ◽  
Shao-Ming Fei
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Measurement ◽  
Distinctive Feature ◽  
Complete Classification ◽  
Semidefinite Program

The quantum measurement incompatibility is a distinctive feature of quantum mechanics. We investigate the incompatibility of a set of general measurements and classify the incompatibility by the hierarchy of compatibilities of its subsets. By using the approach of adding noises to measurement operators, we present a complete classification of the incompatibility of a given measurement assemblage with n members. Detailed examples are given for the incompatibility of unbiased qubit measurements based on a semidefinite program.

scholarly journals Conceptual Framework for Quantum Affective Computing and Its Use in Fusion of Multi-Robot Emotions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Yan ◽  
Abdullah Iliyasu ◽  
Kaoru Hirota
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Quantum Measurement ◽  
Affective Computing ◽  
Quantum Gates ◽  
Superposition State ◽  
Unitary Operators ◽  
Computing Paradigm ◽  
Simulation Based

This study presents a modest attempt to interpret, formulate, and manipulate emotion of robots within the precepts of quantum mechanics. Our proposed framework encodes the emotion information as a superposition state whilst unitary operators are used to manipulate the transition of the emotion states which are recovered via appropriate quantum measurement operations. The framework described provides essential steps towards exploiting the potency of quantum mechanics in a quantum affective computing paradigm. Further, the emotions of multi-robots in a specified communication scenario are fused using quantum entanglement thereby reducing the number of qubits required to capture the emotion states of all the robots in the environment, and fewer quantum gates are needed to transform the emotion of all or part of the robots from one state to another. In addition to the mathematical rigours expected of the proposed framework, we present a few simulation-based demonstrations to illustrate its feasibility and effectiveness. This exposition is an important step in the transition of formulations of emotional intelligence to the quantum era.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document