History, Cosmos, Mind, and (Not Quite) Everything

2020 ◽  
pp. 329-352
Author(s):  
Will D. Desmond

Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of History explore the legacies of ancient history and historiography, at the levels of both theory and empirical detail. Their threefold typology of histories into ‘original’, ‘reflective’, and ‘philosophical’ constitutes a concise argument that history has and must, in the course of its development, become theoretical, and that therefore history and philosophy have essentially converged in the modern era—not least in Hegel’s own deeply historical style of thinking. With their vision of a Spirit that develops through four essential stages of the ‘Oriental’, Greek, Roman and ‘Germanic’ worlds, these lectures reveal that, for Hegel, the middle (Greek and Roman) stages are pivotal to the story of progressive human freedom and self-knowledge. The Mediterranean as the ‘middle sea’ (Mittelmeer) is a central historical fact and metaphor for Hegel (long before Braudel), and it was as peoples of the Mediterranean that his Greeks and Romans proved so historically significant—the Greeks with their humanistic art, anthropomorphic religion, philosophical depth, and ‘invention’ of history as a genre; the Romans with their law, inclusive citizenship, universal histories, inclusive empire and pantheon, and ultimately Christianity. This narrative is, in many respects, simply Hegel’s systematization of a long-held consensus. It also looks forward to the even grander narratives of global and ‘big history’, which temporalize the notion of ‘evolution’ and extend it from (human) ‘Spirit’ to all of nature. If so, this serves as a reminder that many facets of Hegel’s antiquity have been revived in new, unexpected forms.

Mare Nostrum ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
William V. Harris

O objetivo deste artigo é lidar com duas questões bastante difíceis que podem ser esquematizadas de modo um tanto simples. Como deve ser escrita a história do Mediterrâneo antigo – se é que ela deve ser escrita? E seria o mediterranismo de muita utilidade para o historiador da antiguidade, ou, diferentemente disso, ele é algo perigoso (e, na verdade, um primo do orientalismo)?


Phoenix ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
R. M. Kallet-Marx ◽  
A. E. Astin ◽  
F. W. Walbank ◽  
M. W. Frederiksen

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Svetlana Iakovleva

The struggle between the Roman State and Mediterranean pirates is a problem in ancient history that has not been sufficiently studied. By analyzing events from the turn of the 1st century BC, the author provides information about the first serious military campaign, as well as the qualitative and quantitative Roman staff directed against the piracy in Cilicia. The author concludes that the problem of piracy was not solved and claims that Cilicia was established not as a province but as a military command aimed to resolve the situation in the Mediterranean Sea.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document