Inscriptions and Papyri

2020 ◽  
pp. 159-178
Author(s):  
Willy Clarysse
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Primary Difference ◽  
Limited Period ◽  
Naming Practices

The chapter analyses naming practices and onomastic patterns in inscriptions and papyri from the Ptolemaic and the Roman periods in Egypt from a quantitative and comparative perspective. A number of examples of individuals who appear in both types of document are discussed. The primary difference between the two types of document are that papyri are directed to a limited audience (whether a single person in letters or contracts or groups of people in administrative documents) for a limited period of time (ranging from an invitation to dinner on a specific day to documents addressed to several generations for the sale of a house), whereas inscriptions are meant to be public and enduring. With the exception of graffiti, inscriptions, often erected on ceremonial or festive occasions when leading persons were present. also tend to show us the upper classes and an official version of the relevant events.

Perceptions of the Collective Other

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Abelson ◽  
Nilanjana Dasgupta ◽  
Jaihyun Park ◽  
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Group Behavior ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Research Focus ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Individual

It is contended that perceptions of groups are affected by particular variables that do not apply to individuals (e.g., intragroup similarity and proximity). Importantly, the perception of outgroup threat has incomplete analogs at the individual level. Results from 3 studies support predictable distinctions between representations of individuals and of groups. Study I showed that priming of the word they produces more extreme negative judgments of the protagonist(s) in a story about 4 individuals acting jointly than in the same story with a single person acting alone. The opposite result holds for priming with the word he. Study 2, with Korean participants, demonstrates that actions by individuals or groups elicit differing preferences for redress. Individual responses (e.g., getting mad) to an individual racial insult (e.g., a snub by a waitress) are preferred to collective responses (e.g., circulating a petition), whereas the reverse preferences holdfor a group insult (e.g., taunts from a gang of White youths). In Study 3, cues to the entitivity of a group are introduced. This concept, introduced by Donald Campbell (1958), distinguishes different degrees of “groupness. ” Visual depictions of collections of unfamiliar humanoid creatures (greebles) were used to convey that they were either similar or dissimilar and either proximate or scattered. Results confirm the expectation that similarity and proximity-two entitive conditions-elicit more negative judgments of the group. Attention to other cues for entitivity may enrich social psychological views of stereotyping and prejudice by focusing on perceptions of groups as coordinated actors with the potential to bring about negative consequences. Such experiments point to the needfor greater research focus on the vastly understudied but fundamental problem of the social cognition of group behavior.

Reading About Persons: The Effects of Conjunctions on the Mental Representation of Person Descriptions

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Krolak-Schwerdt ◽  
Margret Wintermantel ◽  
Nadine Junker ◽  
Julia Kneer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Representation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Person Memory ◽  
Causal Connections ◽  
Single Person ◽  
On Line

Three experiments investigated the processing of person descriptions that consisted of a number of statements about the characteristics of a person. In one condition, each statement referred to a single person attribute and in the other condition, causal and additive conjunctions to verbally link the statements were introduced. Evidence was found that the introduction of verbal links enhanced participants’ memory about the characteristics of the described person. On-line measures of processing showed that the comprehension of person information was strongly facilitated by the introduction of verbal links. Furthermore, the results were due to the introduction of causal connections between person attributes. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for models of person memory and representation.

Detecting Random Responses in a Personality Scale Using IRT-Based Person-Fit Indices

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tour Liu ◽  
Tian Lan ◽  
Tao Xin
Keyword(s):  
Experimental System ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
Random Response ◽  
Person Fit ◽  
Index Method ◽  
Single Person ◽  
Person Fit Index ◽  
Random Responses ◽  
Response Behaviors

Abstract. Random response is a very common aberrant response behavior in personality tests and may negatively affect the reliability, validity, or other analytical aspects of psychological assessment. Typically, researchers use a single person-fit index to identify random responses. This study recommends a three-step person-fit analysis procedure. Unlike the typical single person-fit methods, the three-step procedure identifies both global misfit and local misfit individuals using different person-fit indices. This procedure was able to identify more local misfit individuals than single-index method, and a graphical method was used to visualize those particular items in which random response behaviors appear. This method may be useful to researchers in that it will provide them with more information about response behaviors, allowing better evaluation of scale administration and development of more plausible explanations. Real data were used in this study instead of simulation data. In order to create real random responses, an experimental test administration was designed. Four different random response samples were produced using this experimental system.

Beyond internal OR groups

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Ormerod
Keyword(s):  
Or Groups
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document