Dance Identity

2020 ◽  
pp. 161-182
Author(s):  
Anna Pakes
Keyword(s):  
Philosophical Problem ◽  
Nelson Goodman ◽  
Performance Events ◽  
Action Structure ◽  
Dance Identity

Chapter 7 examines dance works’ repeatability, that is, their capacity to appear in/through multiple (and potentially quite diverse) performance events. The philosophical problem of identity is introduced as the challenge of explaining when and why two or more performances are of the same work. The chapter explores situations where repeatability seems compromised because the dancer’s own body or personality is deeply implicated in her dance: distinctions are made between various kinds of cases, and an argument is made for repeatability being circumscribed when a dancer’s identity is built into the action-structure of a work. The chapter examines how far notation and scoring practices enable independent articulation of works, considering how notation and ontological views which centre on it (such as those of Nelson Goodman and Graham McFee) struggle to anchor performance identity. The chapter ends with a brief consideration of choreographic copyright practices and disputes and their relationship to ontological concerns.

Taking Responsibility for Injustice

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Goodhart
Keyword(s):  
Philosophical Problem ◽  
Social Conventions ◽  
Political Work ◽  
Political Struggles ◽  
Iris Marion Young ◽  
Taking Responsibility

This chapter puts many of the ideas outlined previously to work in considering the problem of responsibility for systemic injustice. Building on the insights of Iris Marion Young and Marion Smiley, it argues that responsibility must be reconceptualized as a political rather than a philosophical problem and that its solution lies in counterhegemonic political struggles over the meaning of injustice itself. The chapter shows, in a concrete way, what such struggles might look like, describing the ways in which social conventions and interpretations structure our thinking about responsibility and what might be done to challenge and change them. It concludes that to take responsibility for injustice is to take up this political work.

scholarly journals Microarchitectural Characterization on a Mobile Workload

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1225
Author(s):  
Woohyong Lee ◽  
Jiyoung Lee ◽  
Bo Kyung Park ◽  
R. Young Chul Kim
Keyword(s):  
Performance Monitoring ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Instruction Level Parallelism ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Performance Events ◽  
Hardware Performance Counters ◽  
On Chip ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Level Parallelism

Geekbench is one of the most referenced cross-platform benchmarks in the mobile world. Most of its workloads are synthetic but some of them aim to simulate real-world behavior. In the mobile world, its microarchitectural behavior has been reported rarely since the hardware profiling features are limited to the public. As a popular mobile performance workload, it is hard to find Geekbench’s microarchitecture characteristics in mobile devices. In this paper, a thorough experimental study of Geekbench performance characterization is reported with detailed performance metrics. This study also identifies mobile system on chip (SoC) microarchitecture impacts, such as the cache subsystem, instruction-level parallelism, and branch performance. After the study, we could understand the bottleneck of workloads, especially in the cache sub-system. This means that the change of data set size directly impacts performance score significantly in some systems and will ruin the fairness of the CPU benchmark. In the experiment, Samsung’s Exynos9820-based platform was used as the tested device with Android Native Development Kit (NDK) built binaries. The Exynos9820 is a superscalar processor capable of dual issuing some instructions. To help performance analysis, we enable the capability to collect performance events with performance monitoring unit (PMU) registers. The PMU is a set of hardware performance counters which are built into microprocessors to store the counts of hardware-related activities. Throughout the experiment, functional and microarchitectural performance profiles were fully studied. This paper describes the details of the mobile performance studies above. In our experiment, the ARM DS5 tool was used for collecting runtime PMU profiles including OS-level performance data. After the comparative study is completed, users will understand more about the mobile architecture behavior, and this will help to evaluate which benchmark is preferable for fair performance comparison.

Theoretical Difficulties in the Study of Nationalism

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 63-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Tamir
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Philosophical Problem ◽  
Social Phenomenon ◽  
Isaiah Berlin ◽  
Nationalist Discourse ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Good And Evil ◽  
Philosophical Questions

Philosophical questions are not like empirical problems, which can be answered by observation or experiment or entitlements from them. Nor are they like mathematical problems which can be settled by deductive methods, like problems in chess or any other rule-governed game or procedure. But questions about the ends of life, about good and evil, about freedom and necessity, about objectivity and relativity, cannot be decided by looking into even the most sophisticated dictionary or the use of empirical or mathematical reasoning. Not to know where to look for the answer is the surest symptom of a philosophical problem.Isaiah BerlinCritics of recent philosophical analyses of nationalism suggest that nationalism is a unique social phenomenon that cannot, and need not, be theorized. Are there, indeed, some special features constitutive of nationalism that might defy theorization? Those answering this question in the affirmative point to the plurality and specificity of national experiences, as well as to the emotional and eclectic nature of nationalist discourse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document