Evolutionary History of the Human Endogenous Retrovirus Family ERV9

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Costas ◽  
Horacio Naveira
2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1578-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Mang ◽  
Jolanda Maas ◽  
Antoinette C. van der Kuyl ◽  
Jaap Goudsmit

ABSTRACT To study the evolutionary history of Papio cynocephalus endogenous retrovirus (PcEV), we analyzed the distribution and genetic characteristics of PcEV among 17 different species of primates. The viral pol-env and long terminal repeat and untranslated region (LTR-UTR) sequences could be recovered from all Old World species of the papionin tribe, which includes baboons, macaques, geladas, and mangabeys, but not from the New World monkeys and hominoids we tested. The Old World genera Cercopithecus andMiopithecus hosted either a PcEV variant with an incomplete genome or a virus with substantial mismatches in the LTR-UTR. A complete PcEV was found in the genome of Colobus guereza—but not in Colobus badius—with a copy number of 44 to 61 per diploid genome, comparable to that seen in papionins, and with a sequence most closely related to a virus of the papionin tribe. Analysis of evolutionary distances among PcEV sequences for synonymous and nonsynonymous sites indicated that purifying selection was operational during PcEV evolution. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that possibly two subtypes of PcEV entered the germ line of a common ancestor of the papionins and subsequently coevolved with their hosts. One strain of PcEV was apparently transmitted from a papionin ancestor to an ancestor of the central African lowland C. guereza.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Yang ◽  
Raunaq Malhotra ◽  
Rayan Chikhi ◽  
Daniel Elleder ◽  
Theodora Kaiser ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundAll vertebrate genomes have been colonized by retroviruses along their evolutionary trajectory. Although it is clear that endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) can contribute important physiological functions to contemporary hosts, such benefits are attributed to long-term co-evolution of ERV and host. Newly colonized ERVs are thought unlikely to contribute to host genome evolution because germline infections are rare and because the host effectively silences them. The genomes of several outbred species including mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are currently being colonized by ERVs, which provides an opportunity to study ERV dynamics at a time when few are fixed.Here we investigate the history of cervid endogenous retrovirus (CrERV) acquisition and expansion in the mule deer genome to determine the potential impact of endogenizing retroviruses on host genomic diversity.MethodsA mule deer genome was de novo assembled from short and long insert mate pair reads. Scaffolds were further assembled using reference assisted chromosome assembly (RACA) to provide spatial orientation of CrERV insertion sites and to facilitate assembly of CrERV sequences. We applied phylogenetic and coalescent approaches to non-recombinant genomes to determine CrERV evolutionary history, augmenting ancestral divergence estimates with the prevalence of each CrERV locus in a population of mule deer. Recombination history was investigated on partial genome alignments.ResultsThe CrERV composition and diversity in the mule deer genome has recently measurably increased by horizontal acquisition of a new retroviruses lineage and because of recombination with existing CrERV. Resulting interlineage recombinants also endogenized and subsequently retrotransposed. CrERV loci are significantly closer to genes than expected if integration were random and gene proximity might explain the recent expansion by retrotransposition of one recombinant CrERV lineage.ConclusionsThere has been a burst of CrERV integrations during a recent retrovirus epizootic that increased genomic CrERV burden and has resulted in extensive insertional polymorphism in contemporary mule deer genomes. Recombination is a defining feature of CrERV evolutionary dynamics driven by this colonization, increasing CrERV burden and CrERV genetic diversity. These data support that retroviral colonization during an epizootic provides a burst of genomic diversity to the host population.


2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (19) ◽  
pp. 8917-8926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Reus ◽  
Jens Mayer ◽  
Marlies Sauter ◽  
Hans Zischler ◽  
Nikolaus Müller-Lantzsch ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Sequences homologous to the human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) family HERV-K(HML-2) are present in all Old World primate species. A previous study showed that a central region of the HERV-K(HML-2)gag genes in Hominoidea species displays a 96-bp deletion compared to the gag genes in lower Old World primates. The more ancient HERV-K(HML-2) sequences present in lower Old World primates were apparently not conserved during hominoid evolution, as opposed to the deletion variants. To further clarify the evolutionary origin of the HERV-K(HML-2) family, we screened GenBank with the 96-bp gag-sequence characteristic of lower Old World primates and identified, to date, 10 human sequence entries harboring either full-length or partially deleted proviral structures, probably representing remnants of a more ancient HERV-K(HML-2) variant. The high degree of mutations demonstrates the long-time presence of these HERV-K(OLD) proviruses in the genome. Nevertheless, they still belong to the HML-2 family as deduced from dot matrix and phylogenetic analyses. We estimate, based on the family ages of integratedAlu elements and on long terminal repeat (LTR) divergence data, that the average age of HERV-K(OLD) proviruses is ca. 28 million years, supporting an integration time before the evolutionary split of Hominoidea from lower Old World primates. Analysis of HERV-K(OLD) LTR sequences led to the distinction of two subgroups, both of which cluster with LTRs belonging to an evolutionarily older cluster. Taken together, our data give further insight into the evolutionary history of the HERV-K(HML-2) family during primate evolution.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document