A Two-Year Prospective Multicenter Study of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Prescription Trends and Predictors

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2166-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalila R Veiga ◽  
Liliane Mendonça ◽  
Rute Sampaio ◽  
José M Castro-Lopes ◽  
Luís F Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
Opioid Users

Abstract Objectives Opioid use in chronic pain has increased worldwide in recent years. The aims of this study were to describe the trends and patterns of opioid therapy over two years of follow-up in a cohort of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients and to assess predictors of long-term opioid use and clinical outcomes. Methods A prospective cohort study with two years of follow-up was undertaken in four multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics. Demographic data, pain characteristics, and opioid prescriptions were recorded at baseline, three, six, 12, and 24 months. Results Six hundred seventy-four CNCP patients were recruited. The prevalence of opioid prescriptions at baseline was 59.6% (N = 402), and 13% (N = 86) were strong opioid prescriptions. At 24 months, opioid prescription prevalence was as high as 74.3% (N = 501), and strong opioid prescription was 31% (N = 207). Most opioid users (71%, N = 479) maintained their prescription during the two years of follow-up. Our opioid discontinuation was very low (1%, N = 5). Opioid users reported higher severity and interference pain scores, both at baseline and after two years of follow-up. Opioid use was independently associated with continuous pain, pain location in the lower limbs, and higher pain interference scores. Conclusions This study describes a pattern of increasing opioid prescription in chronic pain patients. Despite the limited improvement of clinical outcomes, most patients keep their long-term opioid prescriptions. Our results underscore the need for changes in clinical practice and further research into the effectiveness and safety of chronic opioid therapy for CNPC.

scholarly journals ADHERENCE TO OPIOID THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NON-CANCER PAIN ATTENDING A PAIN CLINIC IN MALAYSIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussam Mizher ◽  
Che S Zin ◽  
Asween R Sani ◽  
Abdul Hadi Bin Mohamed ◽  
Tan H Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medication Possession Ratio ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Pain Intensity Score ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
Opioid Users

Objectives: This study examined the adherence to opioid therapy in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). The prevalence of opioid use and pain scores was also explored.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with noncancer pain attending a pain clinic at a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from August 2016 to February 2017. All patients prescribed with any of the five available opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, and dihydrocodeine) were included in the study, and their medical and prescription records were assessed for further information on opioid use such as the type of opioid, dose, frequency, and duration. The prevalence of opioid use was calculated by dividing the number of opioid users and the total number of patients attending the pain clinic during the study. Adherence was calculated for patients with long-term opioid therapy (>90 days/ year) and measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR). This was derived by sum up the total days covered with medication in the last 365 days; and then divide that by the total days, the medication was prescribed over the same period. A cutoff point of 80% or more was considered as adherence. The pain intensity score was assessed through a numerical scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) at four different points (now, on average, least in the last 24 h, and worst in the last 24 h).Results: A total of 555 patients with various noncancer pain conditions attended the pain clinic during the study. The prevalence of opioid use among these patients was 13.5% (n=74/555). Of these, 24.3% (n=18/74) of patients using opioids for long term (>90 days) and were included in the adherence measure. 78% (n=14/18) of these long-term opioid users were adherent to opioid therapy with a reported MPR >80%. 22% (n=4/18) of patients showed nonadherence to opioid therapy with a reported MPR <80%. The mean pain score for both adherent and nonadherent groups was 5/10, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups.Conclusion: The preliminary results of this study demonstrated that the majority of patients with chronic opioid use adhered to their prescribed opioids. The prevalence of opioid use among patients with noncancer pain was low, and the number of patients using opioid for the long term was ~20% which is similar to the finding from the previous study. The future research is required to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with CNCP using opioid for long term particularly in nonadherent patients.

scholarly journals The Role of Testosterone Supplemental Therapy in Opioid-Induced Hypogonadism: A Retrospective Pilot Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1208-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer A. Raheem ◽  
Sunil H. Patel ◽  
David Sisul ◽  
Tim J. Furnish ◽  
Tung-Chin Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
Supplemental Therapy

Chronic opioid therapy for pain management is known to induce several endocrine changes. The authors examined the effect of testosterone supplemental therapy (TST) in patients with chronic, noncancer pain undergoing opioid therapy. It was hypothesized that treatment of opioid-induced hypogonadism (OIH) can reduce opioid requirements in patients suffering from chronic pain and approve their quality of life. Over 18 months period, patients with OIH were identified in a tertiary referral pain center, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores and daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) were the primary outcomes measured. Data were collected and comparative analysis performed between men undergoing TST versus nontreatment group. Twenty-seven OIH patients (total testosterone <300 ng/dL) were identified during the study period. TST group consists of 11 patients, while non-TST group consists of 16 patients as control cohort. Mean patient age (55 and 54.4, p = .4) and basic metabolic index (28.5 and 31.9, p = .07) in TST and non-TST groups, respectively. Mean follow-up total testosterone (ng/dL) was significantly higher after TST compared with the non-TST group (497.5 vs. 242.4 ng/dL, p = .03). Median follow-up NRS was 0 and 2 in the TST and non-TST groups ( p = .02). Mean MED (mg) decreased by 21 mg in TST group and increased by 2.5 mg in non-TST group ( p < .05). This study reports that treatment of OIH with TST can reduce opioid requirements in men with chronic pain as quantified by MED. It also confirms previous reports on the potential effects of OIH and that TST is effective in correcting opioid-induced endocrine abnormalities.

Opioid Misuse and Addiction Among Patients With Chronic Pain

2019 ◽  
pp. 339-354
Author(s):  
Marc O. Martel ◽  
Robert N. Jamison
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Opioid Misuse ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Medication Misuse ◽  
Opioid Medications ◽  
Noncancer Pain

Chapter 20 provides an introduction to understanding the prevalence and risk factors as well as screening tools for assessing opioid misuse and addiction in patients with chronic pain. In the era of the opioid epidemic in North America and beyond, the use of prescription opioid medications to help improve function in chronic noncancer pain is frequently debated. Out of fear of iatrogenic addiction, litigation, and/or potential medication misuse, some clinicians are refusing to prescribe opioids for chronic pain. Evidence indicates that rates of opioid misuse and addiction are fairly high among chronic pain patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy, but there is consensus that opioids can be safe and effective for carefully selected and monitored patients.

scholarly journals The association between initial opioid type and long-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery in elderly opioid-naïve patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-764
Author(s):  
Amalie H. Simoni ◽  
Lone Nikolajsen ◽  
Anne E. Olesen ◽  
Christian F. Christiansen ◽  
Søren P. Johnsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Calendar Time ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Opioid Users ◽  
Fracture Surgery

AbstractObjectivesLong-term opioid use after hip fracture surgery has been demonstrated in previously opioid-naïve elderly patients. It is unknown if the opioid type redeemed after hip surgery is associated with long-term opioid use. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the opioid type redeemed within the first three months after hip fracture surgery and opioid use 3–12 months after the surgery.MethodsA nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using data from Danish health registries (2005–2015). Previously opioid-naïve patients registered in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, aged ≥65 years, who redeemed ≥1 opioid prescription within three months after the surgery, were included. Long-term opioid use was defined as ≥1 redeemed prescription within each of three three-month periods within the year after hip fracture surgery. The proportion with long-term opioid use after surgery, conditioned on nine-month survival, was calculated according to opioid types within three months after surgery. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for different opioid types were computed by logistic regression analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using morphine as reference. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, comorbidity and calendar time before and after 2010.ResultsThe study included 26,790 elderly, opioid-naïve patients with opioid use within three months after hip fracture surgery. Of these patients, 21% died within nine months after the surgery. Among the 21,255 patients alive nine months after surgery, 15% became long-term opioid users. Certain opioid types used within the first three months after surgery were associated with long-term opioid use compared to morphine (9%), including oxycodone (14%, aOR; 1.76, 95% CI 1.52–2.03), fentanyl (29%, aOR; 4.37, 95% CI 3.12–6.12), codeine (13%, aOR; 1.55, 95% CI 1.14–2.09), tramadol (13%, aOR; 1.56, 95% CI 1.35–1.80), buprenorphine (33%, aOR; 5.37, 95% CI 4.14–6.94), and >1 opioid type (27%, aOR; 3.83, 95% CI 3.31–4.44). The proportion of long-term opioid users decreased from 18% before 2010 to 13% after 2010.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that use of certain opioid types after hip fracture surgery is more associated with long-term opioid use than morphine and the proportion initiating long-term opioid use decreased after 2010. The findings suggest that some elderly, opioid-naïve patients appear to be presented with untreated pain conditions when seen in the hospital for a hip fracture surgery. Decisions regarding the opioid type prescribed after hospitalization for hip fracture surgery may be linked to different indication for pain treatment, emphasizing the likelihood of careful and conscientious opioid prescribing behavior.

scholarly journals Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement remediates anhedonia in chronic opioid use by enhancing neurophysiological responses during savoring of natural rewards

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Eric L. Garland ◽  
Spencer T. Fix ◽  
Justin P. Hudak ◽  
Edward M. Bernat ◽  
Yoshio Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Skin Conductance Level ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Natural Reward ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Natural Rewards ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Users

Abstract Background Neuropsychopharmacologic effects of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in the context of chronic pain may result in subjective anhedonia coupled with decreased attention to natural rewards. Yet, there are no known efficacious treatments for anhedonia and reward deficits associated with chronic opioid use. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE), a novel behavioral intervention combining training in mindfulness with savoring of natural rewards, may hold promise for treating anhedonia in LTOT. Methods Veterans receiving LTOT (N = 63) for chronic pain were randomized to 8 weeks of MORE or a supportive group (SG) psychotherapy control. Before and after the 8-week treatment groups, we assessed the effects of MORE on the late positive potential (LPP) of the electroencephalogram and skin conductance level (SCL) during viewing and up-regulating responses (i.e. savoring) to natural reward cues. We then examined whether these neurophysiological effects were associated with reductions in subjective anhedonia by 4-month follow-up. Results Patients treated with MORE demonstrated significantly increased LPP and SCL to natural reward cues and greater decreases in subjective anhedonia relative to those in the SG. The effect of MORE on reducing anhedonia was statistically mediated by increases in LPP response during savoring. Conclusions MORE enhances motivated attention to natural reward cues among chronic pain patients on LTOT, as evidenced by increased electrocortical and sympathetic nervous system responses. Given neurophysiological evidence of clinical target engagement, MORE may be an efficacious treatment for anhedonia among chronic opioid users, people with chronic pain, and those at risk for opioid use disorder.

Monitoring outcomes during long-term opioid therapy for noncancer pain: Results with the Pain Assessment and Documentation Tool

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Passik, PhD ◽  
Kenneth L. Kirsh, PhD ◽  
Laurie Whitcomb, MA ◽  
Jeffrey R. Schein, PhD, MPH ◽  
Mitchell A. Kaplan, PhD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
Documentation Tool ◽  
Pain Patients

The increasingly common practice of long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain must be guided by ongoing assessment of four types of outcomes: pain relief, function, side effects, and drug-related behaviors. Our objective was to gather initial pilot data on the clinical application of a specialized chart note, the Pain Assessment and Documentation Tool (PADT), which was developed and tested with 27 physicians. This pilot test provided the means to collect cross-sectional outcome data on a large sample of opioid-treated chronic pain patients. Each of the physician volunteers (located in a variety of settings across the United States) completed the PADT for a convenience sample of personally treated chronic pain patients who had received at least three months of opioid therapy. Completion of the PADT required a clinical interview, review of the medical chart, and direct clinical observation. Data from the PADTs were collated and analyzed. The results suggested that the majority of patients with chronic pain achieve relatively positive outcomes in the eyes of their prescribing physicians in all four relevant domains with opioid therapy. Analgesia was modest but meaningful, functionality was generally stabilized or improved, and side effects were tolerable. Potentially aberrant behaviors were common but viewed as an indicator of a problem (i.e., addiction or diversion) in only approximately 10 percent of cases. Using the PADT, physician ratings can be developed in four domains. In this sample, outcomes suggested that opioid therapy provided meaningful analgesia.

scholarly journals Prediction based on preoperative opioid use of clinical outcomes after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan T. Villavicencio ◽  
E. Lee Nelson ◽  
Vinod Kantha ◽  
Sigita Burneikiene
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Opioid Medications

OBJECTIVE Opioid analgesics have become some of the most prescribed drugs in the world, despite the lack of long-term studies evaluating the benefits of opioid medications versus their risks associated with chronic use. In addition, long-term opioid use may be associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative opioid use predicted inferior clinical outcomes among patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease. METHODS The authors of this observational study prospectively enrolled 93 patients who underwent 1-level to 2-level TLIFs in 2011–2014; the patient cohort was divided into 2 groups according to preoperative opioid use or no such use. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low-back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and the scores of the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were used to assess pain, disability, and health-related quality of life outcomes, respectively. The clinical scores for the 2 groups were determined preoperatively and at a 12-month follow-up examination. RESULTS In total, 60 (64.5%) patients took prescribed opioid medications preoperatively. Compared with those not taking opioids preoperatively, these patients had significantly higher VAS scores for low-back pain (p = 0.016), greater disability (p = 0.013), and lower PCS scores (p = 0.03) at the 12-month follow-up. The postoperative MCS scores were also significantly lower (p = 0.035) in the opioid-use group, but these lower scores were due to significantly lower baseline MCS scores in this group. A linear regression analysis did not detect opioid dose–related effects on leg and back pain, disability, and MCS and PCS scores, suggesting that poorer outcomes are not significantly correlated with higher opioid doses taken by the patients. CONCLUSIONS The use of opioid medications to control pain before patients underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions was associated with less favorable clinical outcomes postoperatively. This is the first study that has demonstrated this association in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing TLIF; this association should be studied further to evaluate the conclusions of the present study. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01406405 (clinicaltrials.gov)

scholarly journals Opioid Prescribing Practices and Training Needs of Québec Family Physicians for Chronic Noncancer Pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Élise Roy ◽  
Richard J. Côté ◽  
Denis Hamel ◽  
Pierre-André Dubé ◽  
Éric Langlois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Pain Syndromes ◽  
Noncancer Pain ◽  
And Training

Aim. To examine medical practices and training needs of Québec family physicians with respect to pain management and opioid prescription for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Methodology. An online survey was carried out in 2016. Results. Of 636 respondents (43.0% men; 54.3% ≥ 50 years old), 15.2% and 70.9% felt very or somewhat confident that they could properly prescribe opioids for CNCP. Concerns related to abuse (72.5% strongly/somewhat agree), dependence (73.2%), and lack of support (75.4%) were the main barriers reported. Only 19.7% always/often screened their patients for risks of abuse and dependence using a screening tool. About two-thirds of participants (65.7%) had recently (last five years) taken part in continuing education programs on opioid use for CNCP and 73.4% on CNCP management. Patient evaluation and differential diagnoses of chronic pain syndromes were rated as a top priority for further training. Conclusions. This study provides insights into Québec family physicians’ concerns, practices, and needs with respect to the management of CNCP. Physicians’ difficulties around the application of strategies to mitigate the problem of opioid abuse and addiction are worrying. The need to better train physicians in the field of pain and addiction cannot be emphasized enough.

scholarly journals SP7.1.8 Routine use of opioids for post-operative pain in opioid naïve patient can risk long term dependence

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Majeed ◽  
Simon Mcgurk ◽  
Jeremy Wilson ◽  
Conor Magee
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Aims and Objectives Aim of our study was to evaluate the current practices of prescribing opioids for post-operative pain in opioid-naive patients in our region and the risk of prolonged opioid use among them. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed where cohort consisted of patients who had surgery in 2018 with at least one year follow up. Endpoints were the proportion of all patients and opioid naïve patients, discharged on opioid prescription and proportion of opioid naïve patients who developed opioid dependence after one year. Results During 2018, 17524 patients underwent a total of 20526 surgical procedures by pan surgical specialties in our hospitals. 8772 patients (50%) were discharged with opioid prescription. 673 (7.70%) of those required further opiate prescriptions after discharge, of those requiring opiates, 331 had no opiate exposure before surgery (342 had previous opiate exposure). In opioid naïve patients, at 1 year follow up 151 (45%) had no further opiate prescriptions, but 180 (55%) required ongoing opiate prescriptions after one year follow up. The risk of opioid dependence after surgery is significant in opioid naïve patients. Conclusion Results are alarming and evidence-based strategies, national and local guidelines are needed to prevent the opioid crisis in the UK. There is a need for a national campaign to minimize the dependence on opioids and to find, better alternatives to opioids.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document