scholarly journals Reassessment of Data Used in Setting Exposure Limits for Hot Particles

1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Baum ◽  
D.G. Kaurin
Author(s):  
Mary A. Fox ◽  
Richard Todd Niemeier ◽  
Naomi Hudson ◽  
Miriam R. Siegel ◽  
Gary Scott Dotson

Protecting worker and public health involves an understanding of multiple determinants, including exposures to biological, chemical, or physical agents or stressors in combination with other determinants including type of employment, health status, and individual behaviors. This has been illustrated during the COVID-19 pandemic by increased exposure and health risks for essential workers and those with pre-existing conditions, and mask-wearing behavior. Health risk assessment practices for environmental and occupational health typically do not incorporate multiple stressors in combination with personal risk factors. While conceptual developments in cumulative risk assessment to inform a more holistic approach to these real-life conditions have progressed, gaps remain, and practical methods and applications are rare. This scoping review characterizes existing evidence of combined stressor exposures and personal factors and risk to foster methods for occupational cumulative risk assessment. The review found examples from many workplaces, such as manufacturing, offices, and health care; exposures to chemical, physical, and psychosocial stressors combined with modifiable and unmodifiable determinants of health; and outcomes including respiratory function and disease, cancers, cardio-metabolic diseases, and hearing loss, as well as increased fertility, menstrual dysfunction and worsened mental health. To protect workers, workplace exposures and modifiable and unmodifiable characteristics should be considered in risk assessment and management. Data on combination exposures can improve assessments and risk estimates and inform protective exposure limits and management strategies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenori Tanaka ◽  
Alpha A. Lee ◽  
Michael P. Brenner
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Émilie Counil ◽  
Emmanuel Henry

This article analyzes the consequences of the increasing reference to scientific expertise in the decision and implementation process of occupational health policy. Based on examples (exposure limits and attributable fractions) taken from an interdisciplinary seminar conducted in 2014 to 2015 in France, it shows how the measurement or regulation of a problem through biomedicine-based tools produces blind spots. It also uses a case study to show the contradictions between scientific and academic aims and public health intervention. Other indirect implications are also examined, such as the limitation of trade unions’ scope for action. Finally, the article suggests launching a broad political debate accessible to nonspecialists about collective occupational health issues—a dialogue made difficult by the rise of the afore-mentioned techno-scientific perspective.


2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albin Czernichowski ◽  
Lech Pawlowski ◽  
Blanchard Nitoumbi
Keyword(s):  

Risk Analysis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger M. Cooke ◽  
Margaret MacDonell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document